Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1091–1114 | Cite as

Analyzing the Relationship Between Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Social Affiliation

  • Carola HommerichEmail author
  • Tim Tiefenbach
Research Paper

Abstract

While previous studies have established social capital as an important determinant of subjective well-being (SWB), the broader social context people are living in has not received much attention in terms of SWB. To address this issue, we propose the concept of social affiliation, measuring the feeling of belonging to the social whole, of being a respected and valued member of society. In contrast to standard concepts of social capital, social affiliation is not related to an individual’s direct environment (‘Gemeinschaft’), but concerns one’s relation to society (‘Gesellschaft’). Such a subjective evaluation of how an individual feels within a broader societal context is neither covered by traditional concepts of social capital nor by the concept of social cohesion which focuses on the macro level. A perception of oneself as living on the margins of society, of not being a respected member of society, is very likely to diminish subjective well-being. At the same time, it can be expected to not be completely unrelated to individual resources of social capital. Drawing on unique survey data from Japan, we analyze the triangle relationship between social capital, social affiliation and subjective well-being applying a structural equation model. Our results have two main implications. First, we show that social affiliation has an effect on subjective well-being that is independent from the effect of standard measures of social capital. Second, we find that social capital influences social affiliation, and thereby also has an indirect effect on subjective well-being. In terms of theory building our results suggest that social embeddedness has two elements which should be measured separately: a community dimension usually measured as social capital in terms of trust, personal networks and norms, and a societal dimension of being and feeling part of a ‘Gesellschaft’, measured as social affiliation.

Keywords

Social capital Social affiliation Subjective well-being Life satisfaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The survey used in this analysis was generously sponsored by the German Institute for Japanese Studies (DIJ). We are grateful for the support. Any errors or opinions are ours alone.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors declare that the submitted work complies with the accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct in scientific research and that there are no conflicts of interest. The respondents participated voluntarily in the survey. Beforehand, they received information about the purpose of the study as well as about the institution commissioning the survey.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (2012). Social quality: A way to measure the quality of society. Social Indicators Research, 108, 153–167. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9871-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ateca-Amestoy, V., Cortés Aquilar, A., & Moro-Egido, A. I. (2014). Social interactions and life satisfaction: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 527–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Adacemy of Marketing Science, 40, 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauvais, C., & Jenson, J. (2002). Social cohesion: Updating the state of the research. CPRN discussion paper No. F|22 (Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa), http://cprn3.library.carleton.ca/documents/12949_en.pdf. Accessed Feb 21, 2015.
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, P. L. (1998). The limits of social cohesion: Conflict and mediation in pluralist societies: a report of the Bertelsmann Foundation to the Club of Rome. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: Concept and measurement. EUReporting Working Paper, p. 14.Google Scholar
  9. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. In M. R. Hagerty, J. Vogel, & V. Møller (Eds.), Social indicators research series assessing quality of life and living conditions to guide national policy (pp. 403–428). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bjørnskov, C. (2003). The Happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bjørnskov, C. (2006). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-9069-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjørnskov, C., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2013). Is social capital a good concept? Social Indicators Research, 114, 1225–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Böhnke, P. (2004). Perceptions of social integration and exclusion in an enlarged Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  14. Böhnke, P. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  15. Böhnke, P. (2008). Does society matter? Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. Social Indicators Research, 87, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: notes provisores. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 31, 2–3.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Buhler, C. (1962). Genetic aspects of the self. Annals of The New York Academy of Science, 96, 730–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb50159.x.
  19. Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S. J. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior, biases, and beliefs in the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(3–4), 466–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bude, H., & Lantermann, E. D. (2006). Soziale Exklusion und Exklusionsempfinden. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 58, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., & Piachaud, D. (2002). Understanding social exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chuang, Y.-C., Chuang, K.-Y., & Yang, T.-H. (2013). Social cohesion matters in health. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, 87.Google Scholar
  25. Clark, A. E., Fritjers, P., & Schield, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328. doi: 10.1007/BF00292050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.Google Scholar
  29. Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psichologia, 27, 17–34.Google Scholar
  30. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2014). Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety and perceived conflict. European Sociological Review, 30(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2015). Happier together. Social cohesion and subjective well-being in Europe. International Journal of Psychology. published online first, doi: 10.1002/ijop.12149.
  32. Dickes, P. (2008). Social cohesion: Measurement based on the EVS micro data. Statistica Applicata, 20(2), 77–92.Google Scholar
  33. Dickes, P., & Valentova, M. (2013). Construction, validation and application of the measurement of social cohesion in 47 European countries and regions. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 827–846. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0116-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.Google Scholar
  35. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.Google Scholar
  36. Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z., Lorenz, J., Delhey, J., & Boehnke, K. (2013). Social cohesion radar. Measuring common ground. An international comparison of social cohesion. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann-Foundation. http://www.gesellschaftlicher-zusammenhalt.de/fileadmin/Inhalte/Downloads_Sozialer%20Zusammenhalt/Radar_InternationalerVergleich_web_en.pdf.
  37. Förster, M. F., & D’Ercole, M. M. (2009). The OECD approach to measuring income distribution and poverty: Strengths, limits and statistical issues. presentation at the conference measuring poverty, income inequality, and social exclusion: Lessons from Europe. Paris: OECD/University of Maryland International Conference.Google Scholar
  38. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gough, I., & Olofsson, G. (1999). Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Macmillan Press; St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). Gender and well-being around the world: Some insights from the economics of happiness (Working paper series No. 2012-010). Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Sociological Journal, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Han, S. (2015). Social capital and subjective happiness: Which contexts matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 359(1449), 1435–1446. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hommerich, C. (2015). Feeling disconnected: Exploring the relationship between different forms of social capital and civic engagement in Japan. Voluntas, 26, 45–68. doi: 10.1007/s11266-014-9525-3.
  45. Hommerich, C. (2017). The gap as threat: Status anxiety in the ‘Middle’. In: D Chiavacci, C Hommerich (Eds.), Social inequality in post-growth japan: transformation during economic and demographic stagnation. (pp. 37–53). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Hommerich, C., & Kobayashi, J. (2015). Are satisfied people happy? Disentangling subjective well-being in Japan. In G. Trommsdorff & W. R. Assmann (Eds.), Forschung fördern. Am Beispiel von Lebensqualität im Kulturkontext (pp. 201–216). Konstanz: UKV.Google Scholar
  47. Howard, J. A. (1994). A social cognitive conception of social structure. Social Psychological Quarterly, 57(3), 210–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Huang, J., Maassen van den Brink, H., & Groot, W. (2011). College education and social trust: An evidence-based study on the causal mechanisms. Social Indicators Research, 104, 287–310. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9744-y.
  50. Inoguchi, T., & Fuji, S. (2009). The quality of life in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 92, 227–262. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9351-3.
  51. Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. CPRN study No. F | 03 (Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa), http://cprn.org/documents/15723_en.pdf. Accessed Feb 21, 2015.
  52. Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion, social policies in small states series (Vol. 1). London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  53. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development. A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 995–1017. doi: 10.1080/00420980050011208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychological Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klein, C. (2013). Social capital or social cohesion: What matters for subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 891–911. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9963-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kroll, C. (2011). Towards a sociology of happiness: The case of an age perspective on the social context of well-being. Available at SSRN: doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1809833.
  58. Kuroki, M. (2011). Does social trust increase individual happiness in Japan? The Japanese Economic Review, 62(4), 444–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lambert, T. A., Eby, L. T., & Reeves, M. P. (2006). Predictors of networking intensity and network quality among white-collar job seekers. Journal of Career Development, 32(4), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 443–462. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9208-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lochner, K. (1999). Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health and Place, 5(4), 259–270. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8292(99)00016-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Loewe, N., Bagherzadeh, M., Araya-Castillo, L., Thieme, C., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2014). Life domain satisfactions as predictors of overall life satisfaction among workers: Evidence from Chile. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 71–86. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0408-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Marsh, H. W., Kit-Tai, H., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Finding. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Matsushima, M., & Matsunaga, Y. (2015). Social capital and subjective well-being in Japan. Voluntas, 26, 1016–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McDonald, S., & Mair, C. A. (2010). Social capital across the life course: Age and gendered patterns of network resources. Sociological Forum, 25(2), 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Narayan, D. (1999). Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty. World bank, poverty group, policy research Working paper 2167 Washington, D.C., http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1999/10/07/000094946_9909231154006/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf. Accessed Feb 21, 2015.
  68. Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of life: Concept, policy and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Portela, M., Neira, I., & del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective well-being in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114, 493–511. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy (with Robert Leonardi and Rafaella Y. Nanetti). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z. R., & Beaujot, R. (2007). Measuring social cohesion: An experiment using the canadian national survey of giving, volunteering, and participating. Social Indicators Research, 80, 461–492. doi:  10.1007/s11205-006-0011-1.
  73. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & von Berlepsch, V. (2014). Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 357–386. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9426-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Safipour, J., Schopflocher, D., Higginbottom, G., & Emami, A. (2011). Feelings of social alienation: a comparison of immigrant and non-immigrant Swedish youth. Int J of Soc and Social Policy. doi: 10.1108/01443331111149888.Google Scholar
  75. Safipour, J., Tessma, M. K., Higginbottom, G., & Emami, A. (2010). Measuring social alienation in adolescence: Translation and validation of the Jessor and Jessor social alienation scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00810.x.Google Scholar
  76. Schneider, S. M., & Schupp, J. (2014). Individual differences in social comparison and its consequences for life satisfaction: Introducing a short scale of the Iowa-Netherlands comparison orientation measure. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0227-1.Google Scholar
  77. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  78. Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application and scrutiny. Office of environment and social development, Asian Development Bank, Social Development Papers. 2000;1 (June).Google Scholar
  79. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  81. Tiefenbach, T., & Kohlbacher, F. (2015). Happiness in Japan in times of upheaval: Empirical evidence from the national survey on lifestyle preferences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(2), 333–366. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9512-9.
  82. Tokuda, Y., Fujii, S., & Inoguchi, T. (2010). Individual and country-level effects of social trust on happiness: The Asia barometer survey. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(10), 2574–2593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Abhandlung des Kommunismus und des Sozialismus als empirischer Kulturformen. Leipzig: Fues.Google Scholar
  84. Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural construction of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang, F. & Yamagishi, T. (2005). Group-based trust and gender differences in china. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8(2), 199–210.Google Scholar
  86. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yuan, H., & Golpelwar, M. (2012). Testing subjective well-being from the perspective of social quality: Quantile regression evidence from Shanghai, China. Social Indicators Research, published online June 04, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0091-z.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Letters, Department of SociologyHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.German Institute for Japanese Studies (DIJ)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations