Analyzing the Relationship Between Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Social Affiliation
- 948 Downloads
While previous studies have established social capital as an important determinant of subjective well-being (SWB), the broader social context people are living in has not received much attention in terms of SWB. To address this issue, we propose the concept of social affiliation, measuring the feeling of belonging to the social whole, of being a respected and valued member of society. In contrast to standard concepts of social capital, social affiliation is not related to an individual’s direct environment (‘Gemeinschaft’), but concerns one’s relation to society (‘Gesellschaft’). Such a subjective evaluation of how an individual feels within a broader societal context is neither covered by traditional concepts of social capital nor by the concept of social cohesion which focuses on the macro level. A perception of oneself as living on the margins of society, of not being a respected member of society, is very likely to diminish subjective well-being. At the same time, it can be expected to not be completely unrelated to individual resources of social capital. Drawing on unique survey data from Japan, we analyze the triangle relationship between social capital, social affiliation and subjective well-being applying a structural equation model. Our results have two main implications. First, we show that social affiliation has an effect on subjective well-being that is independent from the effect of standard measures of social capital. Second, we find that social capital influences social affiliation, and thereby also has an indirect effect on subjective well-being. In terms of theory building our results suggest that social embeddedness has two elements which should be measured separately: a community dimension usually measured as social capital in terms of trust, personal networks and norms, and a societal dimension of being and feeling part of a ‘Gesellschaft’, measured as social affiliation.
KeywordsSocial capital Social affiliation Subjective well-being Life satisfaction
The survey used in this analysis was generously sponsored by the German Institute for Japanese Studies (DIJ). We are grateful for the support. Any errors or opinions are ours alone.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors declare that the submitted work complies with the accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct in scientific research and that there are no conflicts of interest. The respondents participated voluntarily in the survey. Beforehand, they received information about the purpose of the study as well as about the institution commissioning the survey.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
- Beauvais, C., & Jenson, J. (2002). Social cohesion: Updating the state of the research. CPRN discussion paper No. F|22 (Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa), http://cprn3.library.carleton.ca/documents/12949_en.pdf. Accessed Feb 21, 2015.
- Berger, P. L. (1998). The limits of social cohesion: Conflict and mediation in pluralist societies: a report of the Bertelsmann Foundation to the Club of Rome. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: Concept and measurement. EUReporting Working Paper, p. 14.Google Scholar
- Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. In M. R. Hagerty, J. Vogel, & V. Møller (Eds.), Social indicators research series assessing quality of life and living conditions to guide national policy (pp. 403–428). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Böhnke, P. (2004). Perceptions of social integration and exclusion in an enlarged Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- Böhnke, P. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: notes provisores. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 31, 2–3.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Buhler, C. (1962). Genetic aspects of the self. Annals of The New York Academy of Science, 96, 730–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb50159.x.
- Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., & Piachaud, D. (2002). Understanding social exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chuang, Y.-C., Chuang, K.-Y., & Yang, T.-H. (2013). Social cohesion matters in health. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, 87.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psichologia, 27, 17–34.Google Scholar
- Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2015). Happier together. Social cohesion and subjective well-being in Europe. International Journal of Psychology. published online first, doi: 10.1002/ijop.12149.
- Dickes, P. (2008). Social cohesion: Measurement based on the EVS micro data. Statistica Applicata, 20(2), 77–92.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.Google Scholar
- Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.Google Scholar
- Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z., Lorenz, J., Delhey, J., & Boehnke, K. (2013). Social cohesion radar. Measuring common ground. An international comparison of social cohesion. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann-Foundation. http://www.gesellschaftlicher-zusammenhalt.de/fileadmin/Inhalte/Downloads_Sozialer%20Zusammenhalt/Radar_InternationalerVergleich_web_en.pdf.
- Förster, M. F., & D’Ercole, M. M. (2009). The OECD approach to measuring income distribution and poverty: Strengths, limits and statistical issues. presentation at the conference measuring poverty, income inequality, and social exclusion: Lessons from Europe. Paris: OECD/University of Maryland International Conference.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). Gender and well-being around the world: Some insights from the economics of happiness (Working paper series No. 2012-010). Chicago.Google Scholar
- Hommerich, C. (2015). Feeling disconnected: Exploring the relationship between different forms of social capital and civic engagement in Japan. Voluntas, 26, 45–68. doi: 10.1007/s11266-014-9525-3.
- Hommerich, C. (2017). The gap as threat: Status anxiety in the ‘Middle’. In: D Chiavacci, C Hommerich (Eds.), Social inequality in post-growth japan: transformation during economic and demographic stagnation. (pp. 37–53). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hommerich, C., & Kobayashi, J. (2015). Are satisfied people happy? Disentangling subjective well-being in Japan. In G. Trommsdorff & W. R. Assmann (Eds.), Forschung fördern. Am Beispiel von Lebensqualität im Kulturkontext (pp. 201–216). Konstanz: UKV.Google Scholar
- Huang, J., Maassen van den Brink, H., & Groot, W. (2011). College education and social trust: An evidence-based study on the causal mechanisms. Social Indicators Research, 104, 287–310. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9744-y.
- Inoguchi, T., & Fuji, S. (2009). The quality of life in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 92, 227–262. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9351-3.
- Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. CPRN study No. F | 03 (Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa), http://cprn.org/documents/15723_en.pdf. Accessed Feb 21, 2015.
- Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion, social policies in small states series (Vol. 1). London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
- Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development. A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kroll, C. (2011). Towards a sociology of happiness: The case of an age perspective on the social context of well-being. Available at SSRN: doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1809833.
- Narayan, D. (1999). Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty. World bank, poverty group, policy research Working paper 2167 Washington, D.C., http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1999/10/07/000094946_9909231154006/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf. Accessed Feb 21, 2015.
- Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of life: Concept, policy and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy (with Robert Leonardi and Rafaella Y. Nanetti). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z. R., & Beaujot, R. (2007). Measuring social cohesion: An experiment using the canadian national survey of giving, volunteering, and participating. Social Indicators Research, 80, 461–492. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-0011-1.
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application and scrutiny. Office of environment and social development, Asian Development Bank, Social Development Papers. 2000;1 (June).Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Tiefenbach, T., & Kohlbacher, F. (2015). Happiness in Japan in times of upheaval: Empirical evidence from the national survey on lifestyle preferences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(2), 333–366. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9512-9.
- Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Abhandlung des Kommunismus und des Sozialismus als empirischer Kulturformen. Leipzig: Fues.Google Scholar
- Wang, F. & Yamagishi, T. (2005). Group-based trust and gender differences in china. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8(2), 199–210.Google Scholar
- Yuan, H., & Golpelwar, M. (2012). Testing subjective well-being from the perspective of social quality: Quantile regression evidence from Shanghai, China. Social Indicators Research, published online June 04, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0091-z.