Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1533–1552 | Cite as

Happiness in Behaviour Genetics: An Update on Heritability and Changeability

  • Ragnhild Bang NesEmail author
  • Espen Røysamb
Review Article

Abstract

In this paper we summarize recent behaviour genetic findings on happiness measured as life satisfaction (LS) and subjective wellbeing (SWB) and discuss important implications pertaining to stability and change, including the potential of individual and societal interventions. Broadly speaking, two main research strategies explore genetic and environmental influences on happiness, including quantitative and molecular genetics. Whereas molecular genetics seeks to trace the causal pathways from specific DNA variants, quantitative genetics estimates the magnitude of overall genetic and environmental influences without specifying actual DNA sequences and usually without specifying specific environmental circumstances. Molecular genetic studies have entered the happiness arena, but have shown mixed results. Most replicated findings are therefore based on quantitative genetics and derived from twin and family studies decomposing variation and co-variation into genetic, shared, and non-shared environmental sources. Recent meta-analyses of such studies report genetic influences (i.e., heritability) to account for 32–40 % of the variation in overall happiness (i.e., SWB, LS), and indicate that heritability varies across populations, subgroups, contexts and/or constructs. When exploring stable SWB levels, heritability is reported in the 70–80 % range, whereas momentary positive affect is often entirely situational. Happiness is thus heritable, stable, variable and changeable. What do these findings imply? Can happiness be raised as a platform in individuals and societies? We suggest that individual and societal interventions that target causal pathways and address both amplifying and compensatory processes (i.e., focus on developing strengths and mitigating risks)—thus providing for positive gene-environment matchmaking, are likely to be effective and longer lasting.

Keywords

Happiness Wellbeing Genetic Heritability Stability Intervention 

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of wellbeing: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, L. A., Cesa, I. L., Gatz, M., & Mellins, C. (1992). Genetic and environmental-influences on positive and negative affect: Support for a 2-factor theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(1), 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1973). The developmental analysis of individual differences on multiple measures. In J. R. Nesselroade & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological issues (pp. 219–251). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels, M. (2015). Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: A review and meta-analysis of heritability studies. Behavior Genetics, 45(2), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels, M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Born to be happy? The etiology of subjective wellbeing. Behavior Genetics, 39(6), 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartels, M., Saviouk, V., de Moor, M. H. M., Willemsen, G., van Beijsterveldt, T. C. E. M., Hottenga, J. J., et al. (2010). Heritability and genome-wide linkage scan of subjective happiness. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13(2), 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baselmans, B. M., van Dongen, J., Nivard, M. G., Lin, B. D., Zilhão, N. R., Boomsma, D. I., et al. (2015). Epigenome-wide association study of wellbeing. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18(06), 710–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belsky, J. (1997). Theory testing, effect-size evaluation, and differential susceptibility to rearing influence: The case of mothering and attachment. Child Development, 68(4), 598–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belsky, J., Jonassaint, C., Pluess, M., Stanton, M., Brummett, B., & Williams, R. (2009). Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes&quest. Molecular Psychiatry, 14(8), 746–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006). The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Caprara, G. V., Fagnani, C., Alessandri, G., Steca, P., Gigantesco, A., Sforza, L. L. C., et al. (2009). Human optimal functioning: The genetics of positive orientation towards self, life, and the future. Behavior Genetics, 39(3), 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Plomin, R. (2000). Neighborhood deprivation affects children’s mental health: Environmental risks identified in a genetic design. Psychological Science, 11(4), 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote wellbeing. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013a). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013b). Rising income and the subjective wellbeing of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dyrdal, G. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2013). Reaction and adaptation to the birth of a child: A couple-level analysis. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dyrdal, G. M., Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vitterso, J. (2011). Can a happy relationship predict a happy life? A population-based study of maternal wellbeing during the life transition of pregnancy, infancy, and toddlerhood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(6), 947–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franz, C. E., Panizzon, M. S., Eaves, L. J., Thompson, W., Lyons, M. J., Jacobson, K. C., et al. (2012). Genetic and environmental multidimensionality of well- and ill-being in middle aged twin men. Behavior Genetics, 42(4), 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gastfriend, D. R., & McLellan, A. T. (1997). Treatment matching: Theoretic basis and practical implications. Medical Clinics of North America, 81(4), 945–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gatt, J. M., Burton, K. L., Schofield, P. R., Bryant, R. A., & Williams, L. M. (2014). The heritability of mental health and wellbeing defined using COMPAS-W, a new composite measure of wellbeing. Psychiatry Research, 219(1), 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gordon, E. (2007). Integrating genomics and neuromarkers for the era of brain-related personalized medicine. Personalized Medicine, 4(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grinde, B. (2016). Why negative feelings are important when assessing well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1741–1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gruber, J., Kogan, A., Quoidbach, J., & Mauss, I. B. (2013). Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health. Emotion, 13(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hahn, E., Johnson, W., & Spinath, F. M. (2013). Beyond the heritability of life satisfaction: The roles of personality and twin-specific influences. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 757–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hankin, B. L., Nederhof, E., Oppenheimer, C. W., Jenness, J., Young, J. F., Abela, J. R. Z., et al. (2011). Differential susceptibility in youth: Evidence that 5-HTTLPR × positive parenting is associated with positive affect ‘for better and worse’. Translational Psychiatry, 1, e44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haworth, C. M. A., Wright, M. J., Luciano, M., Martin, N. G., De Geus, E. J. C., Van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., et al. (2010). The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Molecular Psychiatry, 15(11), 1112–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haybron, D. (2014). The value of positive emotion. In J. Gruber & J. Moskowitz (Eds.), Intergrating the dark sides and light sides of positive emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Headey, B. (2013). Set-point theory may now need replacing: Death of a paradigm? In D. Boniwell & C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 887–900). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Heard, E., Tishkoff, S., Todd, J. A., Vidal, M., Wagner, G. P., Wang, J., et al. (2010). Ten years of genetics and genomics: What have we achieved and where are we heading? Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(10), 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heath, A. C., Berg, K., Eaves, L. J., Solaas, M. H., Corey, L. A., Sundet, J., et al. (1985). Education policy and the heritability of educational attainment. Nature, 314, 734–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., et al. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, W., & Krueger, R. F. (2006). How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 680–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Life events as environmental states and genetic traits and the role of personality: A longitudinal twin study. Behavior Genetics, 42(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karg, K., Burmeister, M., Shedden, K., & Sen, S. (2011). The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: evidence of genetic moderation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(5), 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kendler, K. S., Myers, J. M., Maes, H. H., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2011). The relationship between the genetic and environmental influences on common internalizing psychiatric disorders and mental wellbeing. Behavior Genetics, 41(5), 641–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kendler, K. S., Neale, M., Kessler, R., Heath, A., & Eaves, L. (1993). A twin study of recent life events and difficulties. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(10), 789–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kessler, R. C., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Wittchen, H. U. (2012). Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 21(3), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keyes, C. L. M., Myers, J. M., & Kendler, K. S. (2010). The structure of the genetic and environmental influences on mental wellbeing. American Journal of Public Health, 100(12), 2379–2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Williams, B., Newcombe, R., Craig, I. W., et al. (2006). MAOA, maltreatment, and gene–environment interaction predicting children’s mental health: new evidence and a meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry, 11(10), 903–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. King, J. E., & Landau, V. I. (2003). Can chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) happiness be estimated by human raters? Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Krueger, R. F., & Johnson, W. (2008). Behavioral genetics and personality: A new look at the integration of nature and nurture. In O. P. John & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 287–310). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Krueger, R. F., South, S., Johnson, W., & Iacono, W. (2008). The heritability of personality is not always 50%: Gene-environment interactions and correlations between personality and parenting. Journal of Personality, 76(6), 1485–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lichtenstein, P., Yip, B. H., Björk, C., Pawitan, Y., Cannon, T. D., Sullivan, P. F., et al. (2009). Common genetic determinants of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Swedish families: A population-based study. The Lancet, 373(9659), 234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective wellbeing: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 717–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(1), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). How stable is happiness? Using the STARTS model to estimate the stability of life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(5), 1091–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective wellbeing and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lutz, A., Greischar, L. L., Rawlings, N. B., Ricard, M., & Davidson, R. J. (2004). Long-term meditators selfinduce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(46), 16369–16373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase wellbeing? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Manuck, S. B. (2011). Delay discounting covaries with childhood socioeconomic status as a function of genetic variation in the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4). In Presentazione a congresso, Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  66. McGue, M., Bacon, S., & Lykken, D. T. (1993). Personality stability and change in early adulthood: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Menne-Lothmann, C., Jacobs, N., Derom, C., Thiery, E., Van Os, J., & Wichers, M. (2012). Genetic and environmental causes of individual differences in daily life positive affect and reward experience and its overlap with stress-sensitivity. Behavior Genetics, 42(5), 778–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moum, T., Naess, S., Sorensen, T., Tambs, K., & Holmen, J. (1990). Hypertension labeling, life events and psychological wellbeing. Psychological Medicine, 20(3), 635–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A, I. I. I. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mrozek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N. O., Røysamb, E., Orstavik, R. E., Tambs, K., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2013). Major depression and life satisfaction: A population-based twin study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 144(1–2), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N., Røysamb, E., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., & Tambs, K. (2008). Wellbeing and ill-being: shared environments, shared genes? Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N., & Tambs, K. (2010a). Family matters: Happiness in nuclear families and twins. Behavior Genetics, 40(5), 577–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nes, R. B., & Røysamb, E. (2015). The heritability of subjective wellbeing: Review and meta-analysis. In I. M. Pluess (Ed.), The genetics of psychological wellbeing: The role of heritability and genetics in positive psychology (pp. 75–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nes, R. B., Røysamb, E., Harris, J. R., Czajkowski, N., & Tambs, K. (2010b). Mates and marriage matter: Genetic and environmental influences on subjective wellbeing across marital status. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13(4), 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nes, R. B., Røysamb, E., Hauge, L. J., Kornstad, T., Landolt, M. A., Irgens, L. M., et al. (2014). Adaptation to the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly: A prospective longitudinal study of maternal wellbeing and psychological distress. Developmental Psychology, 60(6), 1827–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nes, R. B., Røysamb, E., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Tambs, K., & Harris, J. R. (2005). Subjective wellbeing and sleep problems: A bivariate twin study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8(05), 440–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nes, R. B., Røysamb, E., Tambs, K., Harris, J. R., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2006). Subjective wellbeing: genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychological Medicine, 36(7), 1033–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nesse, R. (2005). Natural seletion and the elusiveness of happiness. In F. Huppert, N. Baylis, & B. Keveme (Eds.), The science of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A., Lee, J. J., Pers, T. H., Rietveld, C. A., et al. (2016). Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature, 533(7604), 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Paunio, T., Korhonen, T., Hublin, C., Partinen, M., Kivimaki, M., Koskenvuo, M., et al. (2009). Longitudinal study on poor sleep and life dissatisfaction in a nationwide cohort of twins. American Journal of Epidemiology, 169(2), 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pluess, M. (Ed.). (2015). Genetics of psychological wellbeing: The role of heritability and genes in positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 901–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Polderman, T. J., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., et al. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Purcell, S. (2002). Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research, 5(6), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., Borkenau, P., & Eid, M. (1998). Genetic and environmental sources of consistency and variability in positive and negative mood. European Journal of Personality, 12(5), 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rietveld, C. A., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., Koellinger, P. D., De Neve, J. E., Tiemeier, H., et al. (2013). Molecular genetics and subjective well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(24), 9692–9697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Risch, N. (2009). Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR), stressful life events, and risk of depression: A meta-analysis (vol 301, pg 2462, 2009). JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(5), 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Røysamb, E., Harris, J. R., Magnus, P., Vitterso, J., & Tambs, K. (2002). Subjective wellbeing. Sex-specific effects of genetic and environmental factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vitterso, J. (2014). Wellbeing: Heritable and changeable. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness: Theory and evidence on whether happiness can change (pp. 9–31). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Røysamb, E., Tambs, K., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Neale, M. C., & Harris, J. R. (2003). Happiness and health: Environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective wellbeing, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rutter, M., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2006). Gene-environment interplay and psychopathology: Multiple varieties but real effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3–4), 226–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. (1983). The Minnesota adoption studies: Genetic differences and malleability. Child Development, 54, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Schnittker, J. (2008). Happiness and success: Genes, families, and the psychological effects of socioeconomic position and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 114, S233–S259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Is it possible to become happier? (And if so, how?). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Silventoinen, K., Sammalisto, S., Perola, M., Boomsma, D. I., Cornes, B. K., Davis, C., et al. (2003). Heritability of adult body height: A comparative study of twin cohorts in eight countries. Twin Research, 6(05), 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Steger, M. F., Hicks, B. M., Kashdan, T. B., Krueger, R. F., & Bouchard, T. J. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the positive traits of the values in action classification, and biometric covariance with normal personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 524–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sullivan, P. F., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2003). Schizophrenia as a complex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(12), 1187–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tang, Y. Y., Lu, Q., Fan, M., Yang, Y., & Posner, M. I. (2012). Mechanisms of white matter changes induced by meditation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(26), 10570–10574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire (pp. 1031–1010). Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  106. Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K. J., Rich, S., & Segal, N. L. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1031–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tsankova, N., Renthal, W., Kumar, A., & Nestler, E. J. (2007). Epigenetic regulation in psychiatric disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Turkheimer, E. (2000). The threel of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Turkheimer, E. (2011). Still missing. Research in Human Development, 8(3–4), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Turkheimer, E. (2012). Genome wide association studies of behavior are social science. In K. S. Plaisance & T. A. C. Reydon (Eds.), Philosophy of behavioral biology (pp. 43–64). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Vaidya, J. G., Gray, E. K., Haig, J., & Watson, D. (2002). On the temporal stability of personality: evidence for differential stability and the role of life experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. van der Aa, N., Boomsma, D. I., Rebollo-Mesa, I., Hudziak, J. J., & Bartels, M. (2010). Moderation of genetic factors by parental divorce in adolescents’ evaluations of family functioning and subjective wellbeing. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13(2), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Veenhoven, R. (2009). Wellbeing in nations and wellbeing of nations: Is there a conflict between individual and society? Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Vukasovic, T., Bratko, D., & Butkovic, A. (2012). Genetic contribution to the individual differences in subjective wellbeing: A meta-analysis. Društvena istraživanja, 21(1 (115)), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Weiss, A., Bates, T. C., & Luciano, M. (2008). Happiness is a personal(ity) thing: The genetics of personality and wellbeing in a representative sample. Psychological Science, 19(3), 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Weiss, A., King, J. E., & Enns, R. M. (2002). Subjective wellbeing is heritable and genetically correlated with dominance in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wood, A. R., Esko, T., Yang, J., Vedantam, S., Pers, T. H., Gustafsson, S., et al. (2014). Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nature Genetics, 46(11), 1173–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. York, T. P., Miles, M. F., Kendler, K. S., Jackson-Cook, C., Bowman, M. L., & Eaves, L. J. (2005). Epistatic and environmental control of genome-wide gene expression. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Young, K. C., Kashdan, T. B., & Macatee, R. (2015). Strength balance and implicit strength measurement: New considerations for research on strengths of character. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Domain for Mental and Physical HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations