Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 993–1011 | Cite as

Income and Wellbeing in a Society on the Verge to Market Integration: The Case of the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon

Research Paper
  • 204 Downloads

Abstract

Based on findings from prior research on the relation between monetary income and subjective wellbeing, researchers have argued that income might relate to subjective wellbeing only until reaching a consumption satiation point where all basic needs are met; beyond this threshold income would not increase wellbeing. We explore this idea by analyzing a panel data set (2002–2010) collected among 982 Tsimane’, a society of largely self-sufficient foragers and farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Subjective wellbeing is measured through four self-reported emotions: happiness, anger, fear, and sadness. As Tsimane’ mostly satisfy their basic needs through subsistence activities, if the argument above holds true, then we should not find any association between income and subjective wellbeing. Results from ordered logistic regressions suggest, however, that—even in this relatively autarkic society—income bears a positive relation with happiness and fear, although it does not seem to be associated with sadness and anger. The magnitude of the income coefficients is small compared to the variables that proxy success in subsistence activities and frequency of social interactions. In the studied society, the relation between income and happiness is likely caused by socio-psychological effects, like status gains, and not by the acquisition of material goods. In a context where wellbeing is mostly derived from success in subsistence activities and social relations, if the pursuit of income generating activities deprives individuals from devoting time to these, then income might, in fact come at a cost in terms of subjective wellbeing.

Keywords

Easterlin paradox Emotional wellbeing Income Indigenous peoples Threshold hypothesis Tsimane’ Amerindians 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all Tsimane’ informants who, during years, have contributed their time to make this research possible. We thank the Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study (TAPS) and National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD Grant # 1R21HD050776) for making the data available. We thank A. Angelsen, J. van den Berg, and A. Pyhälä for comments to a previous version of this article. Reyes-García acknowledges financial support of the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No FP7-261971-LEK during data analysis and writing.

References

  1. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.Google Scholar
  2. Bryan, M. L., & Jenkins, S. P. (2013).Regression analysis of country effects using multilevel data: A cautionary tale. ISER Working Paper Series. 2013–14.Google Scholar
  3. Buunk, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). New directions in social comparison research. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, A. (1999). The mental health of indigenous peoples: An international overview. World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health, 99(1), 11–15.Google Scholar
  6. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2008). Gross national happiness as an answer to the Easterlin Paradox? Journal of Development Economics, 86, 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Arora, R., Harter, J., & Tov, W. (2009).Income’s differential influence on judgments of life versus affective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 233–245). Social Indicators Research Series 39.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship betweenincome and subjective well being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28, 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward and economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and happiness in economic growth: Essays in honor of M. Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, R. (1996). A taste for movement: An exploration of the social ethics of the Tsimane’ of Lowland Bolivia. Ph.D. dissertation, St Andrews University, Scotland.Google Scholar
  14. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel-hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., McDade, T., Tanner, S., et al. (2007). Signaling by consumption in a native Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 124–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., Vadez, V., Valdes-Galicia, C., et al. (2005). Why do subsistence-level people join the market economy? Testing hypotheses of push and pull determinants in Bolivian Amazonia. Journal of Anthropological Research, 61(2), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Godoy, R., Zeinalova, E., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Kosiewicz, H., Leonard, W. R., et al. (2010). Does civilization cause discontentment among indigenous Amazonians? Test of empirical data from the Tsimane’ of Bolivia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(4), 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., McDade, T., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., Tanner, S., et al. (2006). Does village inequality in modern income harm the psyche? Anger, fear, sadness, and alcohol consumption in a pre-industrial society. Social Science and Medicine, 63(2), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grolleau, G., & Saïd, S. (2008). Do you prefer having more or more than others? Survey evidence on positional concerns in France. Journal of Economic Issues, 42(4), 1145–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus in 15 small scale societies. American Economic Review, 91, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Izquierdo, C. (2005). When “health” is not enough: societal, individual and biomedical assessments of well-being among the Matsigenka of the Peruvian Amazon. Social Science and Medicine, 61(4), 767–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(38), 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspective, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (2002). The health of nations. Why inequality is harmful to your health. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Leonard, W., Reyes-García, V., Tanner, S., Rosinger, A., Schultz, A., Vadez, V., … Godoy, R. (2015). The Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study (TAPS): Nine years (2002–2010) of annual data available to the public. Economics and Human Biology, 19, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luz, A. C., Guèze, M., Paneque-Gálvez, J., Pino, J., Macía, M., Orta-Martínez, M., & Reyes-García, V. (2015). How does cultural change affect indigenous peoples’ hunting activity? An empirical study among the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon. Conservation and Society, 13(4), 382–394.Google Scholar
  29. Macinko, J. A., Shi, L. Y., Starfield, B., & Wulu, J. T. (2003). Income inequality and health: A critical review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review, 60, 407–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marmot, M., Wilkinson, R. G., et al. (2001). Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: A response to Lynch et al. British Medical Journal, 322, 1233–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Masferrer-Dodas, E., Rico García-Amado, L., Huanca, T., TAPS Bolivia Study Team, & Reyes-García, V. (2012). Consumption of market goods and wellbeing in small-scale societies: An empirical test among the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 84, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD. (2013). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Reyes-García, V. (2012). Happiness in the Amazon: Folk explanations of happiness in a hunter-horticulutralist society in the Bolivian Amazon. In H. Selin & G. Davey (Eds.), Happiness across Cultures (pp. 209–225). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reyes-García, V., Babigumira, R., Wunder, S., Pyhälä, A., Zorondo-Rodriguez, F., & Angelsen, A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing and income: Empirical patterns in the rural developing world. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9608-2.Google Scholar
  36. Reyes-García, V., Paneque-Galvez, J., Luz, A. C., Gueze, M., Macia, M. J., Orta-Martinez, M., et al. (2014a). Cultural change and traditional ecological knowledge: An empirical analysis from the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon. Human Organization, 73(2), 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reyes-García, V., Paneque-Galvez, J., Bottazzi, M. E., Luz, A. C., Gueze, M., Macia, M., et al. (2014b). Indigenous land reconfiguration and fragmented institutions: A historical political ecology of the Tsimane’ lands (Bolivian Amazon). Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? American Economic Review, 103(3), 598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Suls, J. M., & Wheeler, L. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  42. Vadez, V., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., & Leonard, W. R. (2008). Cash cropping, farm technologies, and deforestation: What are the connections? A model with empirical data from the Bolivian Amazon. Human Organization, 67(4), 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zycherman, A. (2013). The changing value of food: Localizing modernity among the Tsimane’ Indians of Lowland Bolivia. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Columbia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Sciences and TechnologyUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellateraSpain
  2. 2.Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations