The Life Satisfaction of Dual-Earner Mothers and Fathers: Does Flexible Scheduling Matter?
- 731 Downloads
Work and family scholarship emphasizes flexible scheduling policies as a key solution to the challenges faced by workers navigating the work–family interface. Despite making life easier for workers, very little research has considered how such policies relate to life satisfaction, especially in terms of how gender comes into play. This study examines how both the availability of flexible scheduling options and the actual use of such policies are differentially related to the life satisfaction of dual-earner mothers and fathers. To address this research question, we use data from the National Study of the Changing Workforce conducted in the United States (N = 211 dual-earner fathers and 284 dual-earner mothers). Results show that flexible scheduling availability is unrelated to the life satisfaction of fathers and mothers. In contrast, flexible scheduling use is significantly and positively related to life satisfaction for dual-earner mothers, but negatively related to the life satisfaction of dual-earner fathers. Explanations for these findings are discussed.
KeywordsLife satisfaction Flexible scheduling Work and family Dual-earner couples Flextime Flexible work Flexibility
- Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2003). The 2002 national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
- Cleveland, W. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.Google Scholar
- Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
- Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2005). Flexibility enactment theory: Implications of flexibility type, control, and boundary management for work–family effectiveness. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 243–261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- McCampbell, A. S. (1996). Benefits achieved through alternative work schedules. Human Resource Planning, 19, 31–37.Google Scholar
- Minnotte, K. L., & Grotte, M. (2010). Understanding workday housework performance: Testing three theories. The Great Plains Sociologist, 21, 28–50.Google Scholar
- Presser, H. B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economy: Challenges for American families. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work–family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6–15.Google Scholar