Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 2257–2276 | Cite as

Dark Storm Clouds and Rays of Sunshine: Profiles of Negative and Positive Rumination About Daily Hassles and Uplifts

  • Allyson S. GrafEmail author
  • Meagan A. Ramsey
  • Julie Hicks Patrick
  • Amy L. Gentzler
Research Paper

Abstract

Daily negative events (hassles) and positive events (uplifts) have an impact on our subjective well-being, and how we react to those events (e.g., negatively ruminating by reflecting on the difficulties that come with hassles, positively ruminating by reflecting on the good aspects of uplifts) often has additional influence. However, little is known about the use of positive and negative rumination in combination. Using data from 469 adults, we examined retrospective accounts of negative and positive rumination about specific hassles and uplifts in reference to a 24-h period. Although differences in rumination were not observed across various domains (e.g., work, family, health), profiles emerged in relation to valence. Specifically, we identified four profiles of rumination: Non-Ruminators (39 %), Multivalence Ruminators (10 %), Positive Ruminators (26 %) and Negative Ruminators (24 %). Neither age nor gender systematically related to rumination profile. We further examined whether the associations among hassles, uplifts and well-being outcomes differed across these profiles. Results suggested few differences in the structural relations across the profiles, although the strength of associations was stronger for Negative Ruminators than Positive Ruminators. Results are discussed in terms of the robustness of effects of hassles and uplifts on subjective well-being across individual difference variables.

Keywords

Rumination Subjective well-being Hassles Uplifts 

References

  1. Ahles, J. J., Harding, K. A., Mezulis, A. H., & Hudson, M. R. (2015). Sex differences in domain-specific depressogenic cognitive responses to negative and positive life events. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldao, A. (2013). The future of emotion regulation research capturing context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, D. M., & Horn, M. C. (2004). Is daily life more stressful during middle adulthood? In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well being at midlife (pp. 425–451). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). IBM SPSS AMOS 21 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Amos Development Corp.Google Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brans, K., Koval, P., Verduyn, P., Lim, Y. L., & Kuppens, P. (2013). The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life. Emotion, 13(5), 926–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, F. B. (1989). A four-factor model of perceived control: Avoiding, coping, obtaining, and savoring. Journal of Personality, 57(4), 773–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryant, F. B. (2003). Savoring beliefs inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health, 12(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryant, F. B., Smart, C. M., & King, S. P. (2005). Using the past to enhance the present: Boosting happiness through positive reminiscence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(3), 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bylsma, L. M., Taylor-Clift, A., & Rottenberg, J. (2011). Emotional reactivity to daily events in major and minor depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(1), 155–167. doi: 10.1037/a0021662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., et al. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Charles, S. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1068–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, M. C., Matthews, K. A., & Twamley, E. W. (1999). Is life more difficult on Mars or Venus? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in major and minor life events. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21(1), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 486–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feldman, G. C., Joormann, J., & Johnson, S. L. (2008). Responses to positive affect: A self-report measure of rumination and dampening. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4), 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Genet, J. J., & Siemer, M. (2012). Rumination moderates the effects of daily events on negative mood: Results from a diary study. Emotion, 12(6), 1329–1339. doi: 10.1037/a0028070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gentzler, A. L., Kerns, K. A., & Keener, E. (2010). Emotional reaction and regulatory responses to negative and positive events: Associations with attachment and gender. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 78–92. doi: 10.1007/s11031-009-9149-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gentzler, A. L., Palmer, C. A., & Ramsey, M. A. (2015). Savoring with intent: Investigating types of and motives for responses to positive events. Journal of Happiness Studies,. doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9625-9.Google Scholar
  28. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gruber, J., Eidelman, P., Johnson, S. L., Smith, B., & Harvey, A. G. (2011). Hooked on a feeling: rumination about positive and negative emotion in inter-episode bipolar disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(4), 956–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heiy, J. E., & Cheavens, J. S. (2014). Back to basics: A naturalistic assessment of the experience and regulation of emotion. Emotion, 14(5), 878–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holm, J. E., & Holroyd, K. A. (1992). The daily hassles scale (revised): Does it measure stress or symptoms? Behavioral Assessment, 14, 465–482.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, D. R., & Borden, L. A. (2012). Participants at your fingertips: Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to increase student-faculty collaborative research. Teaching of Psychology, 39(4), 245–251. doi: 10.1177/0098628312456615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, S. L., McKenzie, G., & McMurrich, S. (2008). Ruminative responses to negative and positive affect among students diagnosed with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(5), 702–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, D. P., & Whisman, M. A. (2013). Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 367–374. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jose, P. E., Lim, B. T., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Does savoring increase happiness? A daily diary study. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 176–187. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2012.671345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kircanski, K., Thompson, R. J., Sorenson, J. E., Sherdell, L., & Gotlib, I. H. (2015). Rumination and worry in daily life: Examining the naturalistic validity of theoretical constructs. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(6), 926–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1989). Manual for the Hassle and Uplift Scales (Research ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  41. Mallers, M. H., Almeida, D. M., & Neupert, S. D. (2005). Women’s daily physical health symptoms and stressful experiences across adulthood. Psychology and Health, 20(3), 389–403. doi: 10.1080/08870440512331317698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayberry, D. J., & Graham, D. (2001). Hassles and uplifts: Including interpersonal events. Stress and Health, 17, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McIntyre, K. P., Korn, J. H., & Matsuo, H. (2008). Sweating the small stuff: how different types of hassles result in the experience of stress. Stress and Health, 24, 383–392. doi: 10.1002/smi.1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2002). Domain specificity of gender differences in rumination. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 16(4), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moberly, N. J., & Watkins, E. R. (2008). Ruminative self-focus, negative life events, and negative affect. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1034–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nelis, S., Holmes, E. A., & Raes, F. (2015). Response styles to positive affect and depression: Concurrent and prospective associations in a community sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(4), 480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nezlek, J. B. (2005). Distinguishing affective and non-affective reactions to daily events. Journal of Personality, 73, 1539–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nezlek, J. B., & Plesko, R. M. (2003). Affect- and self-based models of relationships between daily events and daily well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 584–596. doi: 10.1177/0146167203251533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Aldao, A. (2011). Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 704–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Larson, J., & Grayson, C. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1061–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pasyugina, I., Koval, P., De Leersnyder, J., Mesquita, B., & Kuppens, P. (2015). Distinguishing between level and impact of rumination as predictors of depressive symptoms: An experience sampling study. Cognition and Emotion, 29(4), 736–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Piazza, J. R., Charles, S. T., Sliwinski, M. J., Mogle, J., & Almeida, D. M. (2013). Affective reactivity to daily stressors and long-term risk of reporting a chronic physical health condition. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45, 110–120. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9423-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Raes, F., Smets, J., Nelis, S., & Schoofs, H. (2012). Dampening of positive affect prospectively predicts depressive symptoms in non-clinical samples. Cognition and Emotion, 26(1), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raes, F., Smets, J., Wessel, I., Van Den Eede, F., Nelis, S., Franck, E., et al. (2014). Turning the pink cloud grey: Dampening of positive affect predicts postpartum depressive symptoms. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 77(1), 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ramsey, M. A., & Gentzler, A. L. (2014). Age differences in subjective well-being across adulthood: The roles of savoring and future time perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 78(1), 3–22. doi: 10.2190/AG.78.1.b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Boca, S., & Philippot, P. (1991). Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 5(5–6), 435–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rimé, B., Philippot, P., Boca, S., & Mesquita, B. (1992). Long-lasting cognitive and social consequences of emotion: Social sharing and rumination. European Review of Social Psychology, 3(1), 225–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roach, A. R., Salt, C. E., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Generalizability of repetitive thought: Examining stability in thought content and process. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 144–158. doi: 10.1007/s10608-009-9232-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryan, R. M., Bernstein, J. H., & Brown, K. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(1), 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Segerstrom, S. C., Roach, A. R., Evans, D. R., Schipper, L. J., & Darville, A. K. (2010). The structure and health correlates of trait repetitive thought in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 505–515. doi: 10.1037/a0019456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Segerstrom, S. C., Stanton, A. L., Alden, L. E., & Shortridge, B. E. (2003). A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: What’s on your mind, and how, and how much? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 909–921. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Segerstron, S. C., Stanton, A. L., Flynn, S. M., Roach, A. R., Testa, J. J., & Hardy, J. K. (2011). Episodic repetitive thought: Dimensions, correlates, and consequences. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 25(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2011.608126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simonson, J., Mezulis, A., & Davis, K. (2011). Socialized to ruminate? Gender role mediates the sex difference in rumination for interpersonal events. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(9), 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith, J. M., & Alloy, L. B. (2009). A roadmap to rumination: A review of the definition, assessment, and conceptualization of this multifaceted construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 116–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stone, A. A., & Neale, J. M. (1980). Development of a methodology for assessing daily experiences (Technical Report No. 80-1). Retrieved from State University of New York at Stony Brook Department of Psychology archives: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA12016.
  71. Stone, A. A., Neale, J. M., & Shiffman, S. (1993). Daily assessments of stress and coping and their association with mood. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 15(1), 8–16.Google Scholar
  72. Stone, A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 9985–9990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sütterlin, S., Paap, M., Babic, S., Kübler, A., & Vögele, C. (2012). Rumination and age: Some things get better. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2012/267327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Takano, K., Sakamoto, S., & Tanno, Y. (2013). Ruminative self-focus in daily life: Associations with daily activities and depressive symptoms. Emotion, 13(4), 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thomsen, D. K., Mehlsen, M. Y., Viidik, A., Sommerlund, B., & Zachariae, R. (2005). Age and gender differences in negative affect—Is there a role for emotion regulation? Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1935–1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Watkins, E. R. (2008). Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 163–206. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., & Michela, J. L. (2003). Savoring versus dampening: Self-esteem differences in regulating positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 566–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zautra, A. J., Affleck, G. G., Tennen, H., Reich, J. W., & Davis, M. C. (2005). Dynamic approaches to emotions and stress in everyday life: Bolger and Zuckerman reloaded with positive as well as negative affects. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00357.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zimmermann, P., & Iwanski, A. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 182–194. doi: 10.1177/0165025413515405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allyson S. Graf
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Meagan A. Ramsey
    • 1
    • 3
  • Julie Hicks Patrick
    • 1
  • Amy L. Gentzler
    • 1
  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Elmira CollegeElmiraUSA
  3. 3.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations