Dark Storm Clouds and Rays of Sunshine: Profiles of Negative and Positive Rumination About Daily Hassles and Uplifts
- 720 Downloads
Daily negative events (hassles) and positive events (uplifts) have an impact on our subjective well-being, and how we react to those events (e.g., negatively ruminating by reflecting on the difficulties that come with hassles, positively ruminating by reflecting on the good aspects of uplifts) often has additional influence. However, little is known about the use of positive and negative rumination in combination. Using data from 469 adults, we examined retrospective accounts of negative and positive rumination about specific hassles and uplifts in reference to a 24-h period. Although differences in rumination were not observed across various domains (e.g., work, family, health), profiles emerged in relation to valence. Specifically, we identified four profiles of rumination: Non-Ruminators (39 %), Multivalence Ruminators (10 %), Positive Ruminators (26 %) and Negative Ruminators (24 %). Neither age nor gender systematically related to rumination profile. We further examined whether the associations among hassles, uplifts and well-being outcomes differed across these profiles. Results suggested few differences in the structural relations across the profiles, although the strength of associations was stronger for Negative Ruminators than Positive Ruminators. Results are discussed in terms of the robustness of effects of hassles and uplifts on subjective well-being across individual difference variables.
KeywordsRumination Subjective well-being Hassles Uplifts
- Almeida, D. M., & Horn, M. C. (2004). Is daily life more stressful during middle adulthood? In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well being at midlife (pp. 425–451). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). IBM SPSS AMOS 21 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Amos Development Corp.Google Scholar
- Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Holm, J. E., & Holroyd, K. A. (1992). The daily hassles scale (revised): Does it measure stress or symptoms? Behavioral Assessment, 14, 465–482.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1989). Manual for the Hassle and Uplift Scales (Research ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
- Stone, A. A., & Neale, J. M. (1980). Development of a methodology for assessing daily experiences (Technical Report No. 80-1). Retrieved from State University of New York at Stony Brook Department of Psychology archives: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA12016.
- Stone, A. A., Neale, J. M., & Shiffman, S. (1993). Daily assessments of stress and coping and their association with mood. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 15(1), 8–16.Google Scholar
- Zautra, A. J., Affleck, G. G., Tennen, H., Reich, J. W., & Davis, M. C. (2005). Dynamic approaches to emotions and stress in everyday life: Bolger and Zuckerman reloaded with positive as well as negative affects. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00357.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmermann, P., & Iwanski, A. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 182–194. doi: 10.1177/0165025413515405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar