Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 1891–1903 | Cite as

Failure-Related Action Orientation and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Forgivingness

  • Rui Shi
  • Shilei Zhang
  • Danmin MiaoEmail author
Research Paper
  • 460 Downloads

Abstract

This study examined the association between failure-related action orientation and life satisfaction, with a primary focus on confirmation of the mediating role of forgivingness in Chinese college students. 277 participants (165 males and 112 females) from Mainland China completed a subscale of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90) called the Failure-related Action Orientation Scale (AOF), the Tendency to Forgive Scale (Brown in Personal Soc Psychol Bull 29(6):759–771, 2003) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener et al. in J Personal Assess 49(1):71–75, 1985). Results from structural equation modeling showed that forgivingness partially mediated the relationship between failure-related action orientation and life satisfaction. Moreover, AOF, forgivingness and life satisfaction did not differ across gender or age groups. Implications for the model of failure-related action orientation, forgivingness and life satisfaction in college students are discussed.

Keywords

Mediator Failure-related action orientation Forgivingness Life satisfaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express appreciation to the anonymous reviewers who made very helpful comments on an earlier version of this article. This research was supported by the Projects of the Shaanxi Province Social Science (2015N014), Shaanxi Province science and Technology Department’s soft science Grant (2013KRM47), and the Projects of Shaanxi university counselor (2015FKT11).

References

  1. Aishvarya, S., Maniam, T., Karuthan, C., Sidi, H., Jaafar, N. R. N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2014). Psychometric properties and validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in psychiatric and medical outpatients in Malaysia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(1), S101–S106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allemand, M. (2008). Age differences in forgivingness: The role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1137–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allemand, M., Job, V., Christen, S., & Keller, M. (2008). Forgivingness and action orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 762–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Affect regulation and motive-incongruent achievement goals: Antecedents of subjective well-being and symptom formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendayan, R., Blanca, M. J., Fernández-Baena, J. F., Escobar, M., & Victoria Trianes, M. (2013). New empirical evidence on the validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in early adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Parrott, L., O’Connor, L. E., & Wade, N. G. (2001). Dispositional forgivingness: Development and construct validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgivingness (TNTF). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1277–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossong, B. (1998) Stress und Handlungskontrolle [Stress and action control]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. Action Orientation and Goal Disengagement, 357 Google Scholar
  10. Brown, R. P. (2003). Measuring individual differences in the tendency to forgive: Construct validity and links with depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 759–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, R. P., & Phillips, A. (2005). Letting bygones be bygones: Further evidence for the validity of the Tendency to Forgive Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(3), 627–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136.Google Scholar
  13. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2001). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, M. B., Baumann, N., & Osborne, D. (2013). You are not alone relatedness reduces adverse effects of state orientation on well-being under stress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diefendorff, J. M., Hall, R. J., Lord, R. G., & Strean, M. L. (2000). Action–state orientation: Construct validity of a revised measure and its relationship to work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective wellbeing. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–452). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliot, A. J., Sheldon, K. M., & Church, M. A. (1997). Avoidance personal goals and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(9), 915–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot, A. J., Thrash, T. M., & Murayama, K. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of self-regulation and well-being: Avoidance personal goals, avoidance coping, stress generation, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 643–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2000). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Fu, H., Watkins, D., & Hui, E. K. (2004). Personality correlates of the disposition towards interpersonal forgiveness: A Chinese perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ha, S., & Kim, S. (2013). Personality and subjective well-being: Evidence from South Korea. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofer, J., Busch, H., & Kärtner, J. (2011). Self-regulation and well-being: The influence of identity and motives. European Journal of Personality, 25(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R. R., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2007). On the regulation of cognitive control: action orientation moderates the impact of high demands in Stroop interference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jostmann, N. B., Koole, S. L., Van Der Wulp, N. Y., & Fockenberg, D. A. (2005). Subliminal affect regulation: The moderating role of action vs. state orientation. European Psychologist, 10(3), 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keller, F., Straub, R., & Wolfersdorf, M. (1994). State orientation and depression: A multilevel approach. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality. Action versus state orientation (pp. 363–371). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  32. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kong, F., & You, X. (2013). Loneliness and self-esteem as mediators between social support and life satisfaction in late adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B. (2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krause, N., & Ellison, C. G. (2003). Forgiveness by God, forgiveness of others, and psychological well–being in late life. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(1), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuhl, J. (1994). Motivation and volition. In G. d’Ydevalle, P. Bertelson, & P. Eelen (Eds.), Current advances in psychological science: An international perspective (pp. 311–340). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality. Action versus state orientation. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  38. Lawler-Row, K. A. (2010). Forgiveness as a mediator of the religiosity—Health relationship. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawler-Row, K. A., & Piferi, R. L. (2006). The forgiving personality: Describing a life well lived? Personality and Individual Differences, 41(6), 1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. P. John, R. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd (ed ed., pp. 795–814). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  41. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(5), 816–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 194–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCullough, M. E., Bellah, C. G., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2001a). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being, and the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J.-A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: the temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., & Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs (pp. 65–88). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice.Google Scholar
  48. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, P. C. E. (2001b). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. McCullough, M. E., & Witvliet, C. V. (2002). The psychology of forgiveness. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 446–458). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mullet, E., Barros, J., Usaï, V., Frongia, L., Neto, F., & Rivière Shafighi, S. (2003). Religious involvement and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 71(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rholes, W. S., Michas, L., & Shroff, J. (1989). Action control as a vulnerability factor in dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13(3), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roberts, R. C. (1995). Forgivingness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 32(4), 289–306.Google Scholar
  54. Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sastre, M. T. M., Vinsonneau, G., Neto, F., Girard, M., & Mullet, E. (2003). Forgivingness and satisfaction with life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(3), 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., Witta, E. L., & Willse, J. T. (2006). The search for “optimal” cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in structural equation modeling. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Song, Zl, Wanberg, C., Niu, X. Y., & Xie, Y. Z. (2006). Action–state orientation and the theory of planned behavior: A study of job search in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Temoshok, L. R., Chandra, P. S., McCullough, M., Pargament, K., & Thoresen, C. (2000). The meaning of forgiveness in a specific situational and cultural context (pp. 41–64). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice.Google Scholar
  60. Toussaint, L. L., Williams, D. R., Musick, M. A., & Everson, S. A. (2001). Forgiveness and health: Age differences in a US probability sample. Journal of Adult Development, 8(4), 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). Dealing with missed opportunities: Action vs. state orientation moderates inaction inertia. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 808–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations 1946–1992. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  63. Worthington Jr, E. L. (ed) (2005). Initial questions about the art and science of forgiving. In Handbook of forgiveness, pp. 1–14. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Worthington, E. L, Jr, & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(4), 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1494–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhu, H. (2014). Social support and affect balance mediate the association between forgiveness and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 3(12), 1–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of HumanitiesNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyFourth Military Medical UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of PsychologyShaanxi Normal UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Psychological Counseling CentreChang’an UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations