Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 1873–1889 | Cite as

Work-to-Life Spillover Effect of Leader–Member Exchange in Groups: The Moderating Role of Group Power Distance and Employee Political Skill

  • Yidong Tu
  • Xinxin LuEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

While prior studies have focused on the effect of leader–member exchange (LMX), representing a dyadic differentiated exchange relationship between a leader and followers, on employees’ job-related outcomes, how LMX at the group level influences one’s life domain has been ignored. The present study shifted attention to the relationship between LMX mean and employee life satisfaction as well as the boundary conditions. Using a sample of 471 employees from 53 groups and hierarchical linear modeling, we examined the cross-level main effect of LMX mean on life satisfaction and the moderation of group power distance and individual political skill. The results revealed that LMX mean had a work-to-life spillover effect on employee life satisfaction. Employee political skill positively moderated the relationship between LMX mean and life satisfaction, whereas group power distance negatively moderated the relation. Theoretical and practical implications were further discussed.

Keywords

LMX mean Life satisfaction Group power distance Political skill Spillover effect 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by 2014–2015 International Scholar Exchange Fellowship Program of Korea Foundation for Advanced Studies and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71402127; 71172203).

References

  1. Ahearn, K. K., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P. (2004). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Atwater, L., Wang, M., Smither, J. W., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 876–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blass, F. R., & Ferris, G. R. (2007). Leader reputation: The role of mentoring, political skill, contextual learning, and adaptation. Human Resource Management, 46(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blickle, G., Oerder, K., & Summers, J. K. (2010). The impact of political skill on career success of employees’ representatives. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breland, J. W., Treadway, D. C., Duke, A. B., & Adams, G. L. (2007). The interactive effect of leader–member exchange and political skill on subjective career success. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(3), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross–cultural psychology (pp. 389–444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 926–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. In E. G. McGoun (Ed.), Advances in international comparative management (pp. 127–149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., Henderson, D. J., & Wayne, S. J. (2008). Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1079–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader–member exchange integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1104–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work a review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, M. G. (1985). A monte carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3), 290–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ford, L. R., & Seers, A. (2006). Relational leadership and team climates: Pitting differentiation versus agreement. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 258–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work–family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, K. M. (2006). Too much of a good thing: The curvilinear effect of leader–member exchange on stress. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Arnell, B., & James, M. (2007). Reputation as a moderator of political behavior-work outcomes relationships: A two-study investigation with convergent results. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(1), 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Humborstad, S. I. W., Humborstad, B., Whitfield, R., & Perry, C. (2008). Implementation of empowerment in Chinese high power-distance organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(7), 1349–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., & Brymer, R. A. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment: A comparison of two scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(6), 976–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS, 107(38), 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kelley, K. M., & Bisel, R. S. (2014). Leaders’ narrative sensemaking during LMX role negotiations: Explaining how leaders make sense of who to trust and when. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lam, S. S., Schaubroeck, J., & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee, C., Pillutla, M., & Law, K. S. (2000). Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26(4), 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, Y., Xu, J., Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2014). Ethical leadership and subordinates’ occupational well-being: A multi-level examination in China. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 823–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader–member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader–member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.Google Scholar
  48. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu, Y., Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Perrewé, P. L., Weitz, B., & Xu, J. (2007). Dispositional antecedents and outcomes of political skill in organizations: A four-study investigation with convergence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(1), 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Lee, C., & Hui, C. (2013). Work-to-family spillover effects of workplace ostracism: The role of work-home segmentation preferences. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loi, R., Lam, L. W., & Chan, K. W. (2012). Coping with job insecurity: The role of procedural justice, ethical leadership and power distance orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Loi, R., Mao, Y., & Ngo, H. Y. (2009). Linking leader–member exchange and employee work outcomes: The mediating role of organizational social and economic exchange. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Mintzberg, H. (1985). The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1988). Psychological testing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Ng, K.-Y., Koh, C., Ang, S., Kennedy, J. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1033–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The ‘What’, ‘Why’ and ‘How’ of employee well-being: A new model. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1994). Leader–member exchange and supervisor career mentoring as complementary constructs in leadership research. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1588–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schyns, P. (2000). The relationship between income, changes in income and life satisfaction in West Germany and the Russian federation: Relative, absolute, or a combination of both? In E. Diener & D. R. Rahtz (Eds.), Advances in quality of life theory and research (pp. 83–109). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Semadar, A., Robins, G., & Ferris, G. R. (2006). Comparing the validity of multiple social effectiveness constructs in the prediction of managerial job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shi, J., Johnson, R. E., Liu, Y., & Wang, M. (2013). Linking subordinate political skill to supervisor dependence and reward recommendations: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The qualityity-of-life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76(3), 343–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sparr, J. L., & Sonnentag, S. (2008). Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 198–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522–552.Google Scholar
  68. Thomas, C. H., & Lankau, M. J. (2009). Preventing burnout: The effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout. Human Resource Management, 48(3), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Huang, X. (2005). Location-level links between diversity and innovative climate depend on national power distance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1171–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vidyarthi, P. R., Anand, S., & Liden, R. C. (2014). Do emotionally perceptive leaders motivate higher employee performance? The moderating role of task interdependence and power distance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 232–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y. Y., & Wu, L. Z. (2010). Political skill, supervisor–subordinate guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. White, M. P., & Dolan, P. (2009). Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1000–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu, P.-C., & Chaturvedi, S. (2009). The role of procedural justice and power distance in the relationship between high performance work systems and employee attitudes: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Management, 35(5), 1228–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2007). Procedural justice climate and group power distance: An examination of cross-level interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 681–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementWuhan UniversityWuhan CityPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Labor and Human ResourcesRenmin University of ChinaBeijing CityPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations