Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 1435–1450 | Cite as

The Effects of Short-Term Personal Goals on Subjective Well-Being

  • P. StecaEmail author
  • D. Monzani
  • A. Greco
  • M. D’Addario
  • E. Cappelletti
  • L. Pancani
Research Paper

Abstract

Several studies demonstrated that subjective well-being is associated with goal value and perceived progress but their validity is affected by methodological biases. Moreover, a few have analysed the influence of short-term goals. We aimed to analyse how the levels of and changes in short-term goals progress and value influence subsequent levels of and changes in subjective well-being. This study adopted a three-wave longitudinal design with one-month intervals. Four hundred nine participants (186 males; age 19–71) reported their subjective well-being and their two most important goals and rated each over time in terms of value and progress. A latent difference score model revealed that levels and increases in goal progress positively influenced subsequent levels of subjective well-being. Goal value increases led to decreases in negative affect. These findings provide insights on the promotion of subjective well-being. Given the importance of goal progress in promoting subjective well-being, we propose the implementation of goal-setting programmes that are aimed at fostering successful goal pursuit.

Keywords

Personal goals Short-term goals Subjective well-being Goal progress Goal value 

References

  1. Boersma, S. N., Maes, S., Joekes, K., & Dusseldorp, E. (2006). Goal processes in relation to goal attainment. Predicting health-related quality of life in myocardial infarction patients. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(6), 927–941. doi: 10.1177/1359105306069095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunstein, J. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1061–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45(6), 735–750. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.6.735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chow, S., Ram, N., Boker, S. M., Fujita, F., & Clore, G. (2005). Emotion as a thermostat: Representing emotion regulation using a damped oscillator model. Emotion, 5(2), 208–225. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Coote, H. M. J., & MacLeod, A. K. (2012). A self-help, positive goal-focused intervention to increase well-being in people with depression. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(4), 305–315. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Zonderman, A. B. (1987). Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being: Longitudinal follow-up of an American national sample. British Journal of Psychology, 78(3), 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 245–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot, A. J., & Niesta, D. (2009). Goals in the context of the hierarchical model of approach-Avoidance motivation. In G. B. Moskowitz, H. Grant, G. B. Moskowitz, & H. Grant (Eds.), The psychology of goals (pp. 56–76). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emmons, R. A. (1989). The personal striving approach to personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 87–126). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Emmons, R. A. (2003). Personal goals, life meaning, and virtue: Wellsprings of a positive life. In C. L. M. Keyes (Ed.), Flourishing: The positive person and the good life (pp. 105–1128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorges, J., Esdar, W., & Wild, E. (2014). Linking goal self-concordance and affective reactions to goal conflict. Motivation and Emotion, 38(4), 475–484. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9392-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Headey, B. (2008). Life goals matter to happiness: A revision of set-point theory. Social Indicators Research, 86(2), 213–231. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9138-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. (1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hortop, E. G., Wrosch, C., & Gagné, M. (2013). The why and how of goal pursuits: Effects of global autonomous motivation and perceived control on emotional well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 37(4), 675–687. doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9349-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, T., Weiss, K. E., Lundquist, J. J., & Soderlind, A. (2002). Perceptions of goal-directed activities of optimists and pessimists: A personal projects analysis. Journal of Psychology, 136(5), 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  29. King, L. A., Richards, J. H., & Stemmerich, E. (1998). Daily goals, life goals and worst fears: Means, ends, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 66(5), 713–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klinger, E. (1977). Meaning & void: Inner experience and the incentives in people’s lives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  31. Klug, H. J. P., & Maier, G. (2014). Linking goal progress and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 37–65. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9493-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koestner, R., Lekes, N., Powers, T. A., & Chicoine, E. (2002). Attaining personal goals: Self-concordance plus implementation intentions equals success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 231–244. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Little, B. R. (1983). Personal projects. A rationale and method for investigation. Environment & Behavior, 15(3), 273–309. doi: 10.1177/0013916583153002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  36. MacLeod, A. K., Coates, E., & Hetherton, J. (2008). Increasing well-being through teaching goal-setting and planning skills: Results of a brief intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 185–196. doi: 10.1007/s10902-007-9057-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Monzani, D., Steca, P., Greco, A., D'Addario, M., Pancani, L., & Cappelletti, E. (2015a). Effective pursuit of personal goals: The fostering effect of dispositional optimism on goal commitment and goal progress. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 203–214. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.019.
  38. Monzani, D., Steca, P., Greco, A., D'Addario, M., Cappelletti, E., & Pancani, L. (2015b). The situational version of the brief cope: Dimensionality and relationships with goal-related variables. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 295–310. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i2.935.
  39. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  40. Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nurmi, J. E. (1989). Planning, motivation, and evaluation in orientation to the future: A latent structure analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 30(1), 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1674–1682. doi: 10.1177/01461672012712010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Palys, T. S., & Little, B. R. (1983). Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal project systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salmela-Aro, K., Nurmi, J. E., Saisto, T., & Halmesmäki, E. (2000). Women's and men's personal goals during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(2), 171–186.Google Scholar
  45. Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 144–164. doi: 10.1080/15427600902911247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soper, D. S. (2014). A priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [software]. http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.
  47. Wallenius, M. (2000). Personal project level of abstraction and project conflict: Relations to psychological well-being. European Journal of Personality, 14(2), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Steca
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Monzani
    • 1
  • A. Greco
    • 1
  • M. D’Addario
    • 1
  • E. Cappelletti
    • 1
  • L. Pancani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Milano – BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations