Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 1313–1325 | Cite as

Beauty in Mind: The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Psychological Well-Being and Distress

  • Nabanita Datta GuptaEmail author
  • Nancy L. Etcoff
  • Mads M. Jaeger
Research Paper


Attractive people enjoy many social and economic advantages. Most studies find effects of attractiveness on happiness or life satisfaction, but based on traditional cross-sectional approaches. We use a large longitudinal survey consisting of a sample of male and female high school graduates from Wisconsin followed from their late teens to their mid-1960s. The panel construction of the data and the fact that interviews of the siblings of the respondents are available allow us to analyze the effects of physical appearance on psychological well-being (human flourishing) and ill-being (distress and depression) conditioning on unobserved individual heterogeneity via random effects. We find a significant positive relationship between measures of physical attractiveness (greater facial attractiveness at high school, and lower BMI and greater height in middle age) and a measure of psychological well-being, and a significant negative relationship between measures of physical attractiveness and distress/depression. These effects are slightly smaller when we adjust for demographics and mental ability but, with the exception of height, remain significant. Our results suggest that attractiveness impacts psychological well-being and depression directly as well as through its effects on other life outcomes.


Physical attractiveness Psychological well-being Distress Longitudinal survey Random effects Sibling differences 



We use data from the WLS of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Since 1991, the WLS has been supported by the National Institute on Aging (AG-9775 AG-21079 and AG-033285), with additional support from the Vilas Estate Trust, the National Science Foundation, the Spencer Foundation, and the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. A public use file of data is available from the WLS, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 and at We thank Danielle Barry and Lauren Haley for assistance.


  1. Agthe, M., Sporrie, M., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Does being attractive always help? Positive and negative effects of attraction on social decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1042–1054.Google Scholar
  2. Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O’Connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32, 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. (1978). Physical attractiveness and locus of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 213–216.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, D., Pietrzak, R. H., & Petry, N. M. (2008). Gender differences in associations between body mass index and DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders: Results from the national epidemiological survey on alcohol and related conditions. Annual Review of Epidemiology, 18, 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Courtiol, A., Raymond, M., Godelle, B., & Ferdy, Jean-Baptiste. (2010). Mate choice and human stature: Homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences. Evolution, 64, 2189–2203.Google Scholar
  6. Deaton, A., & Arora, R. (2009). Life at the top: The benefits of height. Economics and Human Biology, 7, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diaz-Serrano, L. (2009). Disentangling the housing satisfaction puzzle: Does homeownership really matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Wolsic, B., & Fujita, F. (1995). Physical attractiveness and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebner, N. C. (2008). Age of face matters: Age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etcoff, N. L. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freese, J., Meland, S., & Irwin, W. (2007). Expressions of positive emotions in photographs, personality, and later-life marital and health outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 488–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey, B. D., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84, 1174–1194.Google Scholar
  20. Harker, L. A., & Keltner, D. (2001). Expressions of positive emotion in women’s college year book pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror: The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hauser, R. (2009). Beauty, brains, and bulges: Life-course consequences of adolescent attractiveness, ability, and adiposity. Paper presented at the RC28 meeting in Beijing, China, 13–16 May 2009.Google Scholar
  23. Hosada, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson, D. J. & Huston, T. L. (1975). Physical attractiveness and assertiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 79–84.Google Scholar
  25. Karg, K., Burmeister, M., Shedden, K., & Sen, S. (2011). The Serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: Evidence of genetic moderation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGovern, R. J., Neale, M. C., & Kendler, K. S. (1996). The independence of physical attractiveness and symptoms of depression in a female twin population. The Journal of Psychology, 130, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meland, S. (2002). Objectivity in perceived attractiveness: Development of a new methodology for rating physical attractiveness. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  31. Meyer, B., Enström, M. K., Harstveit, M., Bowles, D. P., & Beevers, C. G. (2007). Happiness and despair on the catwalk: Need satisfaction, well-being, and personality adjustment among fashion models. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mobius, M. M., & Rosenblat, T. S. (2006). Why beauty matters. American Economic Review, 96, 222–235.Google Scholar
  33. Muennig, P. (2008). The body politic: The relationship between stigma and obesity-associated disease. BMC Public Health, 8, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norton, D. L. (1976). Personal destinies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryff, C., & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Springer, K. W., Hauser, R. M., & Freese, J. (2006). Bad news indeed for Ryff’s six-factor model for well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1120–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Mangalparad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) [graduates, siblings, and spouses]: 1957–2005 Version 12.26. [machine-readable data file]/Hauser, Robert M. and Sewell, William H. [principal investigator(s)]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, WLS. [distributor];

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Business EconomicsAarhus UniversityÅrhus VDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolCharlestownUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark
  4. 4.The Danish National Centre for Social ResearchCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations