Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 1293–1311 | Cite as

Life Satisfaction in Close Relationships: Findings from a Longitudinal Study

  • Kristin GustavsonEmail author
  • Espen Røysamb
  • Ingrid Borren
  • Fartein Ask Torvik
  • Evalill Karevold
Research Paper


Life satisfaction (LS) is closely linked to romantic relationships. However, we lack knowledge on the nature of the longitudinal associations between LS and relationship quality, as well as on the longitudinal associations between two partners’ LS—especially for persons in long-term relationships. Better understanding of such associations could possibly add to the existing knowledge on how to increase LS. The current study used data from 239 heterosexual couples to examine longitudinal associations between relationship quality and LS over a 3-year period. Associations between one partner’s baseline LS and change in the other partner’s LS from baseline to 3-year follow-up were also examined. Relationship quality predicted change in LS, and LS predicted change in relationship quality. The results also showed that one partner’s LS predicted change in the other partner’s LS over a 3-year period, even when controlling for both partners’ baseline evaluation of relationship quality. The results suggest that a partner’s general LS can increase both the couple’s relationship quality and the other partner’s LS over time. Further, the results also suggest that relationship quality can contribute to positive change of both partners’ LS.


Relationship quality Relationship satisfaction Life satisfaction Subjective well-being 


  1. Beach, S. R. H., Katz, J., Kim, S., & Brody, G. H. (2003). Prospective effects of marital satisfaction on depressive symptoms in established marriages: A dyadic model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, M., & Diener McGavran, M. B. (2008). What makes people happy? A developmenatl approach to the literature on family relationships and well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 347–375). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y.Google Scholar
  9. Dyrdal, G. M., Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vittersø, J. (2011). Can a happy relationship predict a happy life? A population-based study of maternal well-being during the life transition of pregnancy, infancy, and toddlerhood. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9238-2.Google Scholar
  10. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2009). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham heart study. British Medical Journal, 338, 1–13.Google Scholar
  13. Gerstorf, D., Windsor, T. D., Hoppmann, C. A., & Butterworth, P. (2013). Longitudinal change in spousal similarities in mental health: Between-couple and within-couple perspectives. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 540–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gleitman, H. (1995). Psychology (4th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  15. Gustavson, K., & Borren, I. (2014). Bias in the study of prediction of change: A Monte Carlo simulation study of the effects of selective attrition and inappropriate modeling of regression toward the mean. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gustavson, K., Nilsen, W., Ørstavik, R., & Røysamb, E. (2013). Relationship quality, divorce, and well-being: Findings from a three-year longitudinal study. Journal of Positive Psychology. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.858274.Google Scholar
  17. Gustavson, K., Røysamb, E., von Soest, T., Helland, M. J., & Mathiesen, K. S. (2012a). Longitudinal associations between relationship problems, divorce, and life satisfaction: Findings from a 15-year population-based study. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 188–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustavson, K., von Soest, T., Karevold, E., & Røysamb, E. (2012b). Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: Findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study. BMC Public Health, 12.Google Scholar
  19. Hawkins, D. N., & Booth, A. (2005). Unhappily ever after: Effects of long-term, low-quality marriages on well-being. Social Forces, 84, 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Headey, B., & Veenhoven, R. (1989). Does happiness induce a rosy outlook? In R. Veenhoven (Ed.), How harmfull is happiness? Consequences of enjoying life or not (pp. 106–127). Rotterdam: Universitaire Pers.Google Scholar
  21. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. (1991). Top–down versus bottom–up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Close relationships research: A resource for couple and family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hilpert, P., Bodenmann, G., Nussbeck, F. W., & Bradbury, T. N. (2014). Improving personal happiness through couple intervention: A randomized controlled trial of a self-directed couple enhancement program. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9591-7.Google Scholar
  25. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Howes, M. J., Hokanson, J. E., & Loewenstein, D. A. (1985). Induction of depressive affect after prolonged exposure to a mildly depressed individual. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 1110–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2009). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being, the collected work of Ed Diener (pp. 59–74). Social indicators research series. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  30. Kouros, C. D., Papp, L. M., & Cummings, E. M. (2008). Interrelations and moderators of longitudinal links between marital satisfaction and depressive symptoms among couples in established relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucas, R. E. (2005). Time does not heal all wounds: A longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce. Psychological Science, 16, 945–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 795–814). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being, the collected work of Ed Diener (pp. 75–102). Social indicators research series. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Mathiesen, K. S., Sanson, A., Stoolmiller, M., & Karevold, E. (2009). The nature and predictors of undercontrolled and internalizing problem trajectories across early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(2), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  36. Neyer, F. J., & Lehnart, J. (2006). Personality, relationships, and health: A dynamic-transactional perspective. In M. E. Vollrath (Ed.), Handbook of personality and health (pp. 195–213). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Oishi, S., & Koo, M. (2008). Two new questions about happiness. “Is happiness good?” and “Is happiner better?”. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 290–322). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x.Google Scholar
  42. Røsand, G. M. B., Slinning, K., Eberhard-Gran, M., Røysamb, E., & Tambs, K. (2012). The buffering effect of relationship satisfaction on emotional distress in couples. BMC Public Health, 12.Google Scholar
  43. Ruvolo, A. P. (1998). Marital well-being and general happiness of newlywed couples: Relationships across time. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi: 10.1177/0265407598154002.Google Scholar
  44. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  46. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Environmental influences on well-being: A dyadic latent panel analysis of spousal similarity. Social Indicators Research, 98(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shek, D. T. L. (1995). Gender differences in marital quality and well-being in Chinese married adults. Sex Roles. doi: 10.1007/BF01560185.Google Scholar
  48. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tambs, K., & Moum, T. (1992). No large convergence during marriage for health, life-style, and personality in a large sample of Norwegian spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(4), 957–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Vaughn, M. J., & Baier, M. E. M. (1999). Reliability and validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 27(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vittersø, J., Røysamb, E., & Diener, E. (2002). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: Exploring its diverse meaning and relation to economic wealth. In E. Gullone & R. Cummins (Eds.), Social indicators research book series: The universality of quality of life constructs (pp. 81–103). New York: Kluver Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  53. Whisman, M. A., & Uebelacker, L. A. (2009). Prospective associations between marital discord and depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 24, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin Gustavson
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Espen Røysamb
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ingrid Borren
    • 1
  • Fartein Ask Torvik
    • 1
  • Evalill Karevold
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Mental HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations