Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 587–608 | Cite as

Achieving Subjective Well-Being Around the World: The Moderating Influence of Gender, Age and National Goals for Socializing Children

Research Paper

Abstract

We propose that one’s subjective well-being (SWB) arises from the satisfaction of one’s basic needs, but that the importance of attaining specific needs will vary according to one’s gender, age, and national culture. We argue that the role of one’s national-cultural background in that process can best be unpackaged in terms of the emphasis of a nation’s citizens on the goals for socializing children, namely, self-directedness versus other-directedness and civility versus practicality. Accordingly, we analyzed the responses of 65,025 persons across 50 nations to questions on the World Values Survey about their perceived state of health, financial satisfaction, trust of in-group members, and sense of personal control over events. Using HLM analysis, we showed that all four factors were significant predictors of SWB pan-nationally, but that the linkages of financial satisfaction and trust of in-group members to SWB were moderated by a nation’s self-directedness and civility; those of financial satisfaction and health were moderated by age. These results indicate that the socialization emphases characterizing one’s national culture operate to make some of the key contributors to one’s SWB more or less predictive. Cross-national studies are thereby vindicated in their capacity to reveal nation-specific formulas for psychological processes leading to SWB.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Needs satisfaction Culture Socialization goals for children Age and gender 

References

  1. Argyle, M., & Martin, M. (1991). The psychological causes of happiness. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 77–100). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, M. H., & Forgas, J. (1984). Linking person perception to behavior intention across cultures: The role of cultural collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, M. H., & Lun, V. M.-C. (2014). Citizen-making: The role of national goals for socializing children. Social Science Research, 44, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models for social and behavioural research: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A life-span theory of social selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Willness, C. (2005). Cultural context and psychological needs in Canada and Brazil: Testing a self-determination approach to the internalization of cultural practices, identity, and well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Locke, K. D., Zhang, H., Shen, J., de Jesús Vargas-Flores, J., ... & Ching, C. M. (2013). Need satisfaction and well-being: Testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(4), 507–534.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, L. A. (1987). Mutual relevance of mainstream and cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011). How general is trust in ‘most people’? Solving the radius of trust problem and deriving a better measure. American Sociological Review, 76, 786–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout, and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 164–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, H. S., Kern, M. L., & Reynolds, C. A. (2010). Personality and health, subjective well-being, and longevity. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 179–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gelfand, M. J., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Nishii, L. H., & Bechtold, D. J. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 438–512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Greenfield, P. M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamoudi, A., & Dowd, J. B. (2014). Housing, wealth, psychological well-being, and cognitive functioning of older Americans. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(2), 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, D., & Ross, C. E. (1986). Body and mind: The effects of exercise, overweight, and physical health on psychological well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27(4), 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howell, R. T., Kurai, M., & Tam, L. (2013). Money buys financial security and psychological need satisfaction: Testing need theory in affluence. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 17–29. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9774-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kağitçibaşi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for family, parenting, and human development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keller, H., Lamm, B., Abels, M., Yovsi, R., Borke, J., Jensen, H., & Chaudhary, N. (2006). Cultural models, socialization goals, and parenting ethnotheories: A multicultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Layard, R. (2010). Measuring subjective well-being: How should human happiness and life satisfaction be assessed? Science, 327, 534–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 291–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lun, V. M.-C., & Bond, M. H. (2013). Examining the relation of religion and spirituality to subjective well-being across national cultures. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(4), 304–315.Google Scholar
  30. McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Driven to exclude: How core social motives explain social exclusion. In C. N. DeWall (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 31–42). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Osgood, C. E., May, W. S., & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2001). Gender differences in self-concept and psychological well-being in old age: A meta-analysis. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B(4), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raibley, J. R. (2012). Happiness is not well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raudenbush, S. W. (1988). Educational applications of hierarchical linear models: A review. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 85–116.Google Scholar
  37. Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. (2008). Radius of trust: Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Røysamb, E., Tambs, K., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Neale, M. C., & Harris, J. R. (2003). Happiness and health: Environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sastry, J., & Ross, C. E. (1998). Asian ethnicity and the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 208–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sorrentino, R. M., & Roney, C. R. J. (2000). The uncertain mind: Individual differences in facing the unknown. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  50. Steverink, N., & Lindenberg, S. (2006). Which social needs are more important for subjective well-being? What happens to them with aging? Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The well-being of nations: Linking together trust, cooperation, and democracy. In B. A. Sullivan, M. Snyder, & J. L. Sullivan (Eds.), Cooperation: The political psychology of effective human interaction (pp. 323–342). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Van Doesum, N. J., Van Lange, D. A. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Welzel, C. (2010). How selfish are self-expression values? A civicness test. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Westerhof, G. J., & Barrett, A. E. (2005). Age identity and subjective well-being: A comparison of the United States and Germany. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(3), 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied PsychologyLingnan UniversityTuen MunChina
  2. 2.Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of BusinessHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations