Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 553–567 | Cite as

Trajectories of Happiness 5 Years Following Medical Discharge for Traumatic Disability: Differences Between Insider and Outsider Perspectives

  • Carly E. McCordEmail author
  • Timothy R. Elliott
  • Jack W. Berry
  • Andrea T. Underhill
  • Philip R. Fine
  • Mark H. C. Lai
Research Paper

Abstract

We studied the predictive impact of proxy “outsider” reports, injury type, and functional independence on trajectories of happiness over the first 5 years following medical treatment for a traumatic spinal cord injury, brain injury, severe burns or inter-articular fractures (total N = 1,271). It was anticipated that lower functional independence and outsider status would predict lower happiness trajectories, with injury type having little effect over time. A measure of functional impairment and the life satisfaction index containing the items that assessed happiness were administered 12, 24, 48, and 60 months post-discharge. Trajectory modeling revealed that lower functional independence significantly predicted lower happiness, regardless of injury type. Outsider reports predicted significantly higher happiness scores than the insiders reported themselves. These differences persisted across time and injury type. Additional analyses found that insider/outsider status accounted for one percent of the variance in happiness scores and functional independence accounted for twenty percent of the variance. Moreover, for all injury groups, there was no evidence for changes in happiness trajectories over time. Outsider accounts differ significantly from insider estimations of variables of positive adjustment accounts but explain little variation in the reports of happiness overall and still have practical and clinical value as secondary sources of information about positive emotional experiences, particularly when reports from the “insider” are not possible.

Keywords

Happiness Disability Trauma Burns Spinal cord injury Proxy reporting 

References

  1. Andresen, E. M., Vahle, V. J., & Lollar, D. (2001). Proxy reliability: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability. Quality of Life Research, 10, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellman, M. H., & Paley, C. H. (1993). Pain control in children. Parents underestimate children’s pain. British Medical Journal, 307, 1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  4. Boyce, C. J., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Personality prior to disability determines adaptation: Agreeable individuals recover lost life satisfaction faster and more completely. Psychological Science, 22, 1397–1402. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, P. C., & Yeh, C. H. (2005). Agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-report to evaluate quality of life in children with cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Civil, I. D., & Schwab, C. W. (1988). The abbreviated injury scale, 1985 revision: A condensed chart for clinical use. The Journal of Trauma, 28, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Committee on Injury Scaling. (1985). The abbreviated injury scale 1985 revision. Morton Grove, IL: American Association for Automotive Medicine.Google Scholar
  8. Corrigan, J. D., Harrison-Felix, C., Bogner, J., Dijkers, M., Terrill, M. S., & Whiteneck, G. (2003). Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 153–160. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A. (2002). Proxy reporting for subjective well-being: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 25, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Groot, S., Haisma, J. A., Post, M. W. M., van Asbeck, F. W. A., & van der Woude, L. H. V. (2009). Investigation of bias due to loss of participants in a dutch multicentre prospective spinal cord injury cohort study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41, 382–389. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Roon-Cassini, T. A., Rusch, M. D., Mancini, A. D., & Bonanno, G. A. (2010). Psychopathology and resilience following traumatic injury: A latent growth mixture model analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 55, 1–11. doi: 10.1037/a0018601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dembo, T. (1969). Rehabilitation psychology and its immediate future: A problem of utilization of psychological knowledge. Rehabilitation Psychology, 16, 63–72.Google Scholar
  13. Dembo, T. (1970). The utilization of psychological knowledge in rehabilitation. Welfare Review, 8, 1–7.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doward, L. C., Gnanasakthy, A., & Baker, M. G. (2010). Patient reported outcomes: Looking beyond the label claim. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Draper, K., & Ponsford, J. (2009). Long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison of subjective reports by those injured and their relatives. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19, 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunn, D. S., & Brody, C. (2008). Defining the good life following acquired physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53, 413–425. doi: 10.1037/a0013749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn, D. S., Uswatte, G., & Elliott, T. (2009). Happiness, resilience and positive growth following disability: Issues for understanding, research and therapeutic intervention. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 651–664). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dunn, D. S., Uswatte, G., Elliott, T., Lastres, A., & Beard, B. (2013). A positive psychology of physical disability: Principles and progress. In M. F. Wehmeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 427–441). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Enders, C. K. (2011). Analyzing longitudinal data with missing values. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56, 267–288. doi: 10.1037/a0025579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20, 63–89. doi: 10.1007/BF00302333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Granger, C. V., & Hamilton, B. B. (1992). The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1990. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71(2), 108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guyatt, G. H., Juniper, E. F., Griffith, L. E., Feeny, D. H., & Ferrie, P. J. (1997). Children and adult perceptions of childhood asthma. Pediatrics, 99, 165–168. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.2.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hart, T., Sherer, M., Temkin, N., Whyte, J., Dikmen, S., Heinemann, A. W., & Bell, K. (2010). Participant-proxy agreement on objective and subjective aspects of societal participation following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hart, T., Whyte, J., Polansky, M., Millis, S., Hammond, F. M., Sherer, M., et al. (2003). Concordance of patient and family report of neurobehavioral symptoms at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. British Medical Journal, 322, 1297–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holavanahalli, R. K., Lezotte, D. C., Hayes, M., Minhajuddin, A., Fauerbach, J., Engrav, L., et al. (2006). Profile of patients lost to follow-up in the burn injury rehabilitation model systems’ longitudinal database. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 27, 703–712. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000238085.87863.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hui, S.-K. A., Elliott, T., Martin, R., & Uswatte, G. (2011). Family caregiver attributions about care-recipient behavior: Does relationship satisfaction mediate the attribution-distress relationship? British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 642–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 6–18.Google Scholar
  32. Kwok, O., Underhill, A. T., Berry, J. W., Luo, W., Elliott, T. R., & Yoon, M. (2008). Analyzing longitudinal data with multilevel models: An example with individuals living with lower extremity intra-articular fractures. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53, 370–386. doi: 10.1037/a0012765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawrence, R. H., & Liang, J. (1988). Structural integration of the affect balance scale and the life satisfaction index A: Race, sex, and age differences. Psychology and Aging, 3, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang, J. (1985). A structural integration of the affect balance scale and the life satisfaction index A. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Linacre, J. M. (2003). A user’s guide to Winsteps/Ministep: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  36. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 717–730. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592–615. doi: 10.1037/a0025948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lyubomirsky, S., & Leppner, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construction validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lyubormirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Machamer, J., Temkin, N., & Dikmen, S. (2013). Health related quality of life in traumatic brain injury: Is a proxy report necessary? Journal of Neurotrauma, 30, 1845–1851. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacKenzie, E. J., Steinwachs, D. M., & Shankar, B. (1989). Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses: Validation of an ICD9-CM to AIS 85 conversion table. Medical Care, 27, 412–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maxwell, S. E., & Tiberio, S. S. (2007). Multilevel models of change: Fundamental concepts and relationships to mixed models and latent growth-curve analysis. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 439–452). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. McClure, J. (2011). The role of causal attributions in public misconceptions about brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neugarten, B. L., Havighurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journals of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Riley, W. T., Pilkonis, P., & Cella, D. (2011). Application of the National Institutes of Health patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) to mental health research. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 14, 201–208.Google Scholar
  48. Sneeuw, K. C. A., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life with chronic disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 1130–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 237–259.Google Scholar
  50. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Tang, S. T., & McCorkle, R. (2002). Use of family proxies in quality of life research for cancer patients at the end of life: A literature review. Cancer Investigation, 20, 1086–1104. doi: 10.1081/CNV-120005928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Theunissen, N. C. M., Vogels, T. G. C., Koopman, H. M., Verrips, G. H. W., Zwinderman, K. A. H., Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P., & Wit, J. M. (1998). The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 7, 287–397. doi: 10.1023/A:1008801802877.Google Scholar
  53. Ubel, P. A., Loewenstein, G., & Jepson, C. (2003). Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Quality of Life Research, 12, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Westbrook, M. T., & Nordholm, L. A. (1986). Effects of diagnosis on reactions to patient optimism and depression. Rehabilitation Psychology, 31, 79–94.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, L., Catalano, D., Sung, C., Phillips, B., Chou, C. C., Chan, J. Y. C., & Chan, F. (2013). Attachment style, social support, and coping as psychosocial correlates of happiness in persons with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Research, Policy and Education, 27, 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright, B. A. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins. doi: 10.1037/10589-000.
  57. Wright, B. A., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Widening the diagnostic focus: A case for including human strengths and environmental resources. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 26–44). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Yang, M., & Maxwell, S. E. (2014). Treatment effects in randomized longitudinal trials with different types of nonignorable dropout. Psychological Methods, 19, 188–210. doi: 10.1037/a0033804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carly E. McCord
    • 1
    Email author
  • Timothy R. Elliott
    • 2
  • Jack W. Berry
    • 3
  • Andrea T. Underhill
    • 4
  • Philip R. Fine
    • 4
  • Mark H. C. Lai
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Community Health DevelopmentTexas A&M Health Science CenterBryanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologySamford UniversityHomewoodUSA
  4. 4.Injury Control Research CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations