Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 59–80 | Cite as

Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: Incremental Prediction from 30 Facets Over the Big 5

  • Jeromy AnglimEmail author
  • Sharon Grant
Research Paper


This study investigated the relationship between the Big 5, measured at factor and facet levels, and dimensions of both psychological and subjective well-being. Three hundred and thirty-seven participants completed the 30 Facet International Personality Item Pool Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Positive and Negative Affectivity Schedule, and Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being. Cross-correlation decomposition presented a parsimonious picture of how well-being is related to personality factors. Incremental facet prediction was examined using double-adjusted r2 confidence intervals and semi-partial correlations. Incremental prediction by facets over factors ranged from almost nothing to a third more variance explained, suggesting a more modest incremental prediction than presented in the literature previously. Examination of semi-partial correlations controlling for factors revealed a small number of important facet-well-being correlations. All data and R analysis scripts are made available in an online repository.


Subjective well-being Psychological well-being Personality Big 5 Personality facets 



We thank Sue Carmen for her assistance with data collection.


  1. Bardi, A., & Ryff, C. D. (2007). Interactive effects of traits on adjustment to a life transition. Journal of Personality, 75(5), 955–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00462.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouchard, T. J, Jr, & Loehlin, J. C. (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31(3), 243–273. doi: 10.1023/A:1012294324713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Apley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–305). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Butkovic, A., Brkovic, I., & Bratko, D. (2012). Predicting well-being from personality in adolescents and older adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 455–467. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9273-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Compton, W. C. (1998). Measures of mental health and a five factor theory of personality. Psychological Reports, 83(1), 371–381. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.1.371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five factor inventory: professional manual (Vol. 396). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 2, 179–198.Google Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E. (Ed.). (2009). Culture and well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 38). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246–1256. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–34. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7–28.Google Scholar
  20. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J., & Anglim, J. (2009). The Big Five traits as predictors of subjective and psycholoical well-being. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 205–231. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.1.205-231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. J. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  23. Inquisit 3.0 [Computer software]. (2012). Seattle: Millisecond Software.Google Scholar
  24. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & J. P. Oliver (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, J. A. (2000). Web-based personality assessment: Project description and rationale. Paper presented at the 71st annual meeting of the eastern psychological association, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  26. Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Subjective well-being. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 471–484). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  28. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 494–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(6), 1213–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 524–539. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the big five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68(5), 821–835. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quevedo, R. J. M., & Abella, M. C. (2011). Well-being and personality: Facet-level analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 206–211. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryff, C. D., & Essex, M. J. (1992). The interpretation of life experience and well-being: the sample case of relocation. Psychology and Aging, 7(4), 507. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.4.507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1159/000289026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1103–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1062–1075. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: Reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 549–559. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siegler, I. C., & Brummett, B. H. (2000). Associations among NEO personality assessments and well-being at midlife: Facet-level analyses. Psychology and Aging, 15(4), 710–714. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.4.710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soto, C. J. (2014). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the Big Five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12081.
  47. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiss, A., Bates, T. C., & Luciano, M. (2008). Happiness is a personal(ity) thing: The genetics of personality and well-being in a representative sample. Psychological Science, 19(3), 205–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02068.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Health, Arts and DesignSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations