Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 1073–1089 | Cite as

Well-Being: Objectivism, Subjectivism or Sobjectivism?

  • Andrew K. MacLeodEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Well-being is defined in a range of different ways, most notably in the psychological and philosophical literatures. A dimensional scheme is presented that locates the variety of approaches to well-being according to how much they define it by a person’s positive subjective state as opposed to requiring the presence of a range of other, more objective life goods (e.g., achievement, relationships, etc.). Adopting a dimensional model allows variations from the traditional subjectivist and objectivist positions, including a variety of mixed subjective and objective (sobjective) positions. Sobjectivist positions vary in the relative weighting of feeling states and more objective elements, as well as how these two different elements are seen as relating to each other. The dimensional model also has the important effect of enabling psychological and philosophical thinking about well-being to be integrated despite their differences in emphases and concerns. A number of different ways that these two aspects can be combined are outlined, including a two-tier model with happiness as a final good and other goods having value to the extent that they lead to happiness.

Keywords

Well-being Subjectivism Objectivism Hedonia Eudaimonia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Roger Crisp, Steve Holland, Mick Power and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this paper and to Roger Crisp for helpful discussions of the material.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Annas, J. (2004). Happiness as achievement. Daedalus, 133, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle (2000/C4 BCE). Nicomachean ethics, ed. and introd. R. Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arneson, R. J. (1999). Human flourishing versus desire satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy, 16, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentham, J. (1988/1789) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
  6. Broadie, S. & Rowe, C. (Eds.). (2002).  Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics: Translation and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  7. Brülde, B. (2007). Happiness theories of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 15–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crisp, R. (2006). Reasons and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crisp, R. (2013). Well-being. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/well-being. Retrieved July, 2014.
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2009). The contribution of diversity to happiness research. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Broderick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100, 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman, F. (2012). What is this thing called happiness? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Griffin, J. (1996). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, J. S. (2010). The subjective intuition. Philosophical Studies, 148, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hayes, S. C., Strohsal, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  20. Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hurka, T. (2011). The best things in life: A guide to what really matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keyes, C. L. M., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: Distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, C., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraut, R. (2007). What is good and why: The ethics of well-being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mill, J. S. (1979/1861). Utilitarianism, Ed. M. Warnock. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
  29. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Raibley, J. R. (2012). Happiness is not well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Sidgwick, H. (1907/1981). The methods of ethics, 7th ed. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  41. Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness and ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, T. (2012). Knowing what is good for you: A theory of prudential value and well-being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Tiberius, V. (2006). Well-being: Psychological research for philosophers. Philosophy Compass, 1(5), 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tiberius, V. (2013). Recipes for a good life: Eudaimonism and the contribution of philosophy. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us (pp. 19–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  45. Tiberius, V., & Hall, A. (2010). Normative theory and psychological research: Hedonism, eudaimonism and why it matters. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United Nations (2010). Human Development Index and its components. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Table1_reprint.pdf (accessed, July, 2011).
  47. Vella-Brodrick, D., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning—Findings from Australian and US samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective’. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waterman, A. S. (2013). Considering the nature of a life well-lived: Intersections of positive psychology and eudaemonist philosophy. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  50. Wolf, S. (2010). Meaning in life and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Woodard, C. (2013). Classifying theories of welfare. Philosophical Studies, 165, 787–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRoyal Holloway, University of LondonEghamUK

Personalised recommendations