Well-Being: Objectivism, Subjectivism or Sobjectivism?
- 1.3k Downloads
Well-being is defined in a range of different ways, most notably in the psychological and philosophical literatures. A dimensional scheme is presented that locates the variety of approaches to well-being according to how much they define it by a person’s positive subjective state as opposed to requiring the presence of a range of other, more objective life goods (e.g., achievement, relationships, etc.). Adopting a dimensional model allows variations from the traditional subjectivist and objectivist positions, including a variety of mixed subjective and objective (sobjective) positions. Sobjectivist positions vary in the relative weighting of feeling states and more objective elements, as well as how these two different elements are seen as relating to each other. The dimensional model also has the important effect of enabling psychological and philosophical thinking about well-being to be integrated despite their differences in emphases and concerns. A number of different ways that these two aspects can be combined are outlined, including a two-tier model with happiness as a final good and other goods having value to the extent that they lead to happiness.
KeywordsWell-being Subjectivism Objectivism Hedonia Eudaimonia
I am grateful to Roger Crisp, Steve Holland, Mick Power and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this paper and to Roger Crisp for helpful discussions of the material.
- American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Aristotle (2000/C4 BCE). Nicomachean ethics, ed. and introd. R. Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bentham, J. (1988/1789) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
- Broadie, S. & Rowe, C. (Eds.). (2002). Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics: Translation and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Crisp, R. (2013). Well-being. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/well-being. Retrieved July, 2014.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Feldman, F. (2012). What is this thing called happiness? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Griffin, J. (1996). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Strohsal, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
- Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Hurka, T. (2011). The best things in life: A guide to what really matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Mill, J. S. (1979/1861). Utilitarianism, Ed. M. Warnock. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
- Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Sidgwick, H. (1907/1981). The methods of ethics, 7th ed. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness and ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, T. (2012). Knowing what is good for you: A theory of prudential value and well-being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Tiberius, V. (2013). Recipes for a good life: Eudaimonism and the contribution of philosophy. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us (pp. 19–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- United Nations (2010). Human Development Index and its components. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Table1_reprint.pdf (accessed, July, 2011).
- Waterman, A. S. (2013). Considering the nature of a life well-lived: Intersections of positive psychology and eudaemonist philosophy. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Wolf, S. (2010). Meaning in life and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar