Economic Freedom and Life Satisfaction: Mediation by Income per Capita and Generalized Trust
- 730 Downloads
Several researches have shown that economic freedom is positively related to life satisfaction. Only a few studies, however, have examined which aspects of economic freedom (small government size, quality of the legal system, sound money, trade openness or no regulation) drive this relationship. Furthermore, most studies construe the influence of economic freedom as additional to the influence of income per capita on life satisfaction. No research has studied the potential mediating role of income per capita or other mediators in the relationship between economic freedom and life satisfaction. In order to fill these gaps, this paper aims (1) to investigate which aspects of economic freedom are most related to life satisfaction, and (2) to test whether these relationships are mediated by income and trust. Based on a sample of 120 countries, we find that life satisfaction is positively related to the quality of the legal system and negatively related to small government size. Income per capita mediates the positive influence of the quality of the legal system on life satisfaction. Trust is found to mediate the positive influence of the quality of legal system and the negative influence of small government size on life satisfaction, but the significance of these indirect effects depends on the type of economic freedom indicators used. We find no significant direct effects from the economic freedom indicators on life satisfaction.
KeywordsEconomic freedom Income per capita Life satisfaction Mediation Rule of law Trust
- Altman, M. (2008). How much economic freedom is necessary for economic growth? Theory and evidence. Economics Bulletin, 15, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2003). The value of autonomy: Evidence from the selfemployed in 23 countries. Working Paper 173. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
- Berggren, N. (2003) The benefits of economic freedom. A survey. The Independent Review, VIII(2), 193–211.Google Scholar
- Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2011). International happiness. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 16668.Google Scholar
- Calderón, C., Loayza, N., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2005) Does openness imply greater exposure? World Bank Policy Research, working paper no. 3733, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Clarck, A. E., & Lelkes, O. (2009). Let us Pray: Religious interactions in life satisfaction. Paris School of Economics working paper, No. 2009-01.Google Scholar
- Dawson, J. W. (2007). The empirical institutions-growth literature: Is something amiss at the top? Economic Journal Watch, 4(2), 184–196.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Sawangfa, O., Switek, M. S., & Zweig, J. S. (2011). The happiness-income paradox revisited, IZA discussion paper series, No 5799.Google Scholar
- Easton, S. T., & Walker, M. A. (1997). Income, growth, and economic freedom. American Economic Review, 87, 328–332.Google Scholar
- Feldmann, H. (2006). Government size and unemployment: Evidence from industrial countries. Public Choice, 127(3), 451–467.Google Scholar
- Feldmann, H. (2009). Government size and unemployment: Evidence from developing countries. The Journal of Developing Countries, 43(1), 315–330.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1999). The business community’s suicidal impulse. Cato Policy Report, 21(2).Google Scholar
- Gropper, D. M., Lawson, R. A., & Thorne, J. T, Jr. (2011). Economic freedom and happiness. Cato Journal, 31, 237–255.Google Scholar
- Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Gwartney, J. D., Holcombe, R. G., & Lawson, R. A. (2004). Economic freedom, institutional quality, and cross-country differences in income and growth. The Cato Journal, 24(3), 205–233.Google Scholar
- Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Block, W. (1996). Economic freedom in the world, 1975–1995. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
- Gwartney, J. D., Hall, J. C., & Lawson, R. (2010). Economic freedom of the world: 2010 Annual Report, Economic Freedom Network, URL: http://www.freetheworld.com/datasets_efw.html.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analyses. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J. F., & Barington-Leigh, C. P. (2010). How much is social capital worth? NBER working paper series, No. 16025.Google Scholar
- Maddala, G. S. (1991). Introduction to econometrics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Rodrik D, Subramanian A, & Trebbi F (2002) Institutional rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. CEPR Discussion Paper Series 3643.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well being, Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings paper on economic activity (spring).Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- UN (United Nations) (2006) World economic and social survey, http://www.un.org/esa/policy/wess/index.html.
- Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in forty-four nations in the early 1990s. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 257–288). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Veenhoven (2011). World Database of Happiness, Erasmus university Rotterdam http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/statnat/statnat_fp.htm.