Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1333–1345 | Cite as

Measuring Adolescent Life Satisfaction: A Psychometric Investigation of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS)

  • Kelly D. BradleyEmail author
  • Jessica D. Cunningham
  • Richard Gilman
Research Paper

Abstract

Concerns regarding construct bias in psychological assessment have been the subject of ongoing research for a half century. Little research has investigated the psychometric comparability of instruments designed to assess positive perceptions of individuals’ lives. The Multidimensional StudentsLife Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS), is based on a hierarchical factor structure that conceptualizes life satisfaction as an overall satisfaction that is subsumed by five domains believed to be important in youths’ lives: Family, Friends, School, Living Environment, and Self (Huebner in School Psychol Q 19:93–105, 1994). A Rasch measurement model was applied, rather than the typical approach of classical test theory such as factor analysis, to each domain to investigate measurement properties and determine equivalence across race at the item level. Results support a restructure of the rating scale categories due to the limited use of certain ratings and suggest revision of items that demonstrate differential item functioning across race. This study will aid in correct applications and proper interpretation of the scores reported for the MSLSS, as well as offering a methodological framework to apply to comparable psychological assessments.

Keywords

Adolescent life satisfaction Rasch model Rating scale 

References

  1. Adelman, H. S., Taylor, L., & Nelson, P. (1989). Minors’ dissatisfaction with their life circumstances. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 20, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J., & Walsh, J. R. (2000). A construct-based approach to equivalence: Methodologies for cross-cultural and multicultural personality assessment research. In R. Dana (Ed.), Handbook of multicultural/cross-cultural personality assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-068. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the Human Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(1), 137–152.Google Scholar
  8. Cowen, E. L. (1991). In pursuit of wellness. American Psychologist, 46, 404–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. L. D., Mellor, D., & Stokes, M. A. (2008). Encouraging governments to enhance the happiness of their nation: Step 1: Understand subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 91, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7(3), 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Embretson, S. E. (1996). Item response theory models and inferential bias in multiple group comparisons. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Frisch, M. B., Clark, M. P., Rouse, S. V., Rudd, M. P., Paweleck, J., Greenstone, A., et al. (2003). Predictive validity and sensitivity to change in quality of life assessment and life satisfaction: Further studies of the Quality of Life Inventory of QOLI in mental health settings. In M. J. Sirgy, et al. (Eds.), Advances in quality of life theory and research (pp. 191–210). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilman, R., & Barry, J. (2003). Life satisfaction and social desirability among adolescents in a residential treatment setting: Changes across time. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 21, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Review of life satisfaction measures for adolescents. Behavior Change, 17, 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. (2000). A first study of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Scale with adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 52, 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenspoon, P. J., & Saklofske, D. (2001). Toward an integration of subjective well-being and psychopathology. Social Indicators Research, 54, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gullone, E., & Cummins, R. A. (1999). The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale: A psychometric evaluation with an adolescent sample. Behaviour Change, 16, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. School Psychology International, 12, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research and assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huebner, E. S., & Gilman, R. (2002). An introduction to the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Social Indicators Research, 60, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huebner, E. S., Laughlin, J. E., Ash, C., & Gilman, R. (1998). Further validation of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., & Gilman, R. (2006). Life satisfaction. In G. Bear & K. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and correction (pp. 357 – 368).  Bethesda, MD: NASP.Google Scholar
  29. Kan, C. C., Breteler, M. H. M., Van der Ven, A. H. G. S., & Zitman, F. G. (1998). An evaluation of the DSM-III-R and ICD-10 Benzodiazepine Dependence Criteria using Rasch modeling. Addiction, 93(3), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krueger, R. F., & Finger, M. S. (2001). Using item response theory to understand comorbidity among anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewinsohn, P., Redner, J., & Seeley, J. (1991). The relationship between life satisfaction and psychosocial variables: New perspectives. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Subjective well-being (pp. 193–212). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  33. Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimizing rating scale effectiveness. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.Google Scholar
  34. Maxwell, S., & Delaney, H. (1985). Measurement and statistics: An examination of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McKnight, C. G., Huebner, E. S., & Suldo, S. M. (2002). Relationships among stressful life events, temperament, problem behavior, and global life satisfaction in adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 39(6), 677–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moors, G. (2003). Diagnosing response style behavior by means of a latent-class factor approach: Socio-demographic correlates of gender role attitudes and perceptions of ethnic discrimination reexamined. Quality & Quantity, 37, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ozer, D. J., & Reise, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 357–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sam, D. L. (1998). Predicting life satisfaction among adolescents from immigrant families in Norway. Ethnicity & Health, 3, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Santor, D. A., & Ramsay, J. O. (1998). Progress in the technology of measurement: Applications of item response models. Psychological Assessment, 10, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheuneman, J. D., & Bleistein, C. A. (1999). Item bias. In J. P. Keeves & G. N. Masters (Eds.), Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment (Vol. 18). NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  42. Schmitz, M. F., & Baer, J. C. (2001). The vicissitude of measurement: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Emotional Autonomy Scale. Child-Development, 72, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Selner-O’Hagan, M. B., Kindlon, D. J., Buka, S. L., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. J. (1998). Assessing exposure to violence in urban youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(2), 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, R. M. (2004). Detecting item bias with the Rasch model. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, E. V., & Smith, R. M. (2004). Introduction to Rasch measurement. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.Google Scholar
  46. Steel, P., & Ones, D. S. (2002). Personality and happiness: A national level analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 767–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). Does life satisfaction moderate the effects of stressful life events on psychopathological behavior during adolescence? School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait’? Test of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32, 101–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J., Billiet, J., & Cambre, B. (2003). Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 702–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.Google Scholar
  51. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly D. Bradley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jessica D. Cunningham
    • 2
  • Richard Gilman
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Educational Policy Studies and EvaluationUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Georgetown CollegeGeorgetownUSA
  3. 3.Division of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations