Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1239–1257 | Cite as

Is Posner Right? An Empirical Test of the Posner Argument for Transferring Health Spending from Old Women to Old Men

Research Paper

Abstract

Posner (Aging and old age, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995) proposes the redistribution of health spending from old women to old men to equalize life expectancy. His argument is based on the assumption that the woman’s utility is higher if her husband is alive. Using self-reported satisfaction measures from a long-running German panel survey, the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), the present study conducts an empirical test of this assumption and investigates the question of whether and to what extent widowed women’s utility responds to her spouse’s death. We apply a combination of propensity score matching and parametric regression techniques. Our results reveal satisfaction trajectories of women who experience the death of their spouse and identifies the causal effect of widowhood. The average level of satisfaction in a control group of non-widowed women serves as a reference to measure the degree of adaptation to widowhood. The results suggest bereavement has no enduring effect on satisfaction, and that is evidence against Posner’s assumption. We conclude that elderly women would not benefit from Posners policy proposal.

Keywords

Widowhood Adaptation Subjective well-being Life satisfaction Satisfaction with household income Propensity score matching 

References

  1. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In Appley, M. H. (Ed.) Adaptation level theory. A symposium. (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (Eds.) (2005). Economics and happiness. Framing the analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burkhauser, R. V., Giles, P., Lillard, D. R., & Schwarze, J. (2005). Until death do us part: An analysis of economic well-being of widows in four countries. Journal of Gerontology, 60B(5), S238–S246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, K., Kristiansen, M., Hagen-Larsen, H., Skytthe, A., Bathum, L., & Jeune, B., et al. (2000). X-linked genetic factors regulate hematopoietic stem-cell kinetics in females. Blood, 95(7), 2449–2451.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal 118(529), F222–F243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engstler, H., & Menning, S. (2004). Families in Germany-facts and figures. Ministery of Family Affairs, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gjonca, A., Tomassini, C., Toson, B., & Smallwood, S. (2005). Sex differences in mortality, a comparison of the United Kingdom and other developed countries. Health Statistics Quarterly, 26, 6–16.Google Scholar
  11. Ha, J.-H., Carr, D., Utz, R. L., & Nesse, R. (2006). Older adults’ perceptions of intergenerational support after widowhood: How do men and women differ? Journal of Family Issues, 27(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Hahn, M. (2006). Panelwhiz: A flexible modularized Stata interface for accessing large scale panel data sets, mimeo.Google Scholar
  13. Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(42), 17922–17926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kristoffersen, I. (2010). The metrics of subjective wellbeing: Cardinality, neutrality and additivity*. Economic Record, 86(272), 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Allen LaneGoogle Scholar
  19. Lechner, M. (1999). Earnings and employment effects of continuous off-the-job training in East Germany after unification. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(1), 74–90.Google Scholar
  20. Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). Psmatch2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing, Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  21. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2005). Long term care for older people. Paris: OECDGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2013). OECD health data. http://stats.oecd.org. Accessed 31 May 2013.
  24. Posner, R. A. (1995). Aging and old age. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Preston, S. H., & Wang, H. (2006). Sex mortality differences in the United States: The role of cohort smoking patterns. Demography, 43(4), 631–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rasmusen, E. (1996). The Posner argument for transferring health spending from old women to old men. Economics Letters, 53(3), 337–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robert-Koch-Institut (Ed.) (2007) Gesundheit in Deutschland. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Berlin: Robert Koch-InstitutGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.Google Scholar
  30. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwarze, J (2003). Using panel data on income satisfaction to estimate equivalence scale elasticity. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(3), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Utz, R. L., Reidy, E. B., Carr, D., Nesse, R., & Wortman, C. (2004). The daily consequences of widowhood: The role of gender and intergenerational transfers on subsequent housework performance. Journal of Family Issues, 25(5), 683–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2008). Happiness quantified. A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP)–scope, evolution and enhancemants. Schmollers Jahrbuch (Journal of Applied Social Science Studies), 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  36. Waldron, I. (1976). Why do women live longer than men? Social Science & Medicine, 10(7–8), 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, K. (2004). The transition to widowhood and the social regulation of health: Consequences for health and health risk behavior. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(6), S343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wunder, C., Wiencierz, A., Schwarze, J., & Küchenhoff, H. (2013). Well-being over the life span: Semiparametric evidence from British and German longitudinal data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergNurembergGermany
  2. 2.University of BambergBambergGermany
  3. 3.DIW BerlinBerlinGermany
  4. 4.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations