Evaluation of Affect in Mexico and Spain: Psychometric Properties and Usefulness of an Abbreviated Version of the Day Reconstruction Method
- 361 Downloads
The aims of the present study were to assess the psychometric properties of the Spanish-language version of the abbreviated Day Reconstruction Method (DRM), and to investigate differences in affective experience in Mexico and Spain. A total of 2,629 adults from Mexico and 4,583 from Spain were interviewed. Information was obtained using an abbreviated version of the DRM, which had been translated into Spanish. Reliability, validity, and the structure of affect were assessed and compared between countries. The diurnal variation of affect, the changes in affect along the life span, time use, and the relationship between affect and socio-demographic characteristics were also analysed. Adequate psychometric properties for the Spanish-language version of the abbreviated DRM were found in both the Mexican and the Spanish samples, and affect tended to improve along the life span in both countries. However, net affect did not have the same distribution function (Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic = 0.25, p < 0.001) in both countries, being higher in Spain. Moreover, both samples showed opposite patterns in the diurnal variation of affect. The results showed that the Spanish-language version of the DRM is a feasible and valid method to measure affect, its diurnal rhythms, and time use in large-scale surveys.
KeywordsDay Reconstruction Method (DRM) Subjective well-being Net affect U-index
This paper uses data from WHO SAGE and from COURAGE in Europe. WHO’s Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health is supported by the United States National Institute on Aging’s Division of Behavioral and Social Research through Interagency Agreements (OGHA 04034785; YA1323-08-CN-0020; Y1-AG-1005-01) and through a research grant (R01-AG034479) and the World Health Organization’s Department of Health Statistics and Information Systems. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under Grant agreement Number 223071 (COURAGE in Europe), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FIS research Grants Number PS09/00295 and PS09/01845, the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation ACI-Promociona (ACI2009-1010), and the Mental Health and Disability Instrument Library Platform (CIBERSAM). The study was supported by the Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III. J.P. is grateful to the Instituto de Salud Carlos III for a predoctoral grant (PFIS).
- Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2011). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2008). Gini coefficient. Available online at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_di12&lang=en. Accessed June 24, 2013.
- Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. Available online at http://www.earth.columbia.edu/sitefiles/file/Sachs%20Writing/2012/World%20Happiness%20Report.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2013.
- Krueger, A., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. (2008). National time accounting: The currency of life. Available online at www.nber.org/chapters/c5053.pdf?new_window=1. Accessed June 24, 2013.
- Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). OECD better life index. Available online at http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org. Accessed June 24, 2013.
- R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- StataCorp. (2010). Stata statistical software. Release 11. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available online at http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2013.
- The World Bank. (2008). Gini index. Available online at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI/countries?display=default. Accessed June 24, 2013.
- The World Bank. (2011). Countries and economies. Available online at http://data.worldbank.org/country. Accessed June 24, 2013.
- Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Rep. No. Personnel Research Sections Report 984). Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar