Thinking About One’s Subjective Well-Being: Average Trends and Individual Differences
- 852 Downloads
In two studies, participants reported what they had been thinking about while completing measures of subjective well-being (SWB). These thought reports were analyzed with respect to life domain, valence, and how strongly they were related to actual levels of SWB. Most people focused on their life circumstances (e.g., career) rather than on dispositional predictors (e.g., personality) of SWB. The domains mentioned most frequently (career, family, romantic life) were also the ones that were most strongly related to actual SWB, indicating that most of people think about things that actually contribute to their SWB. Some domains are predominantly mentioned in positive contexts (e.g., family) whereas others are predominantly mentioned in negative contexts (e.g., money). On average, people thought more about positive than about negative things, a result that is magnified for respondents high in extraversion or emotional stability. In sum, these findings provide insight into what people think contributes to their SWB; beliefs that may guide them as they make important decisions.
KeywordsSubjective well-being Happiness Source confusion Evaluative space model Personality Self-knowledge
This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (R01-AG036433, R01-AG033590, and R01-AG034052) and by the Department of the Army, Defense Medical Research and Development Program (Award #W81XWH-11-2-0114).We thank Angela McCoy, Shannon Ehlert, and Sarah Short for their assistance in coding the open responses and Elizabeth Necka for feedback on an earlier draft.
- Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Material wealth and subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 307–322). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–304). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Kalil, A., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L., & Thisted, R. A. (2008). Happiness and the invisible threads of social connection: The Chicago health, aging, and social relations study. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 195–219). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Caunt, B., Franklin, J., Brodaty, N., & Brodaty, H. (2012). Exploring the causes of subjective well-being: A content analysis of peoples’ recipes for long-term happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9339-1.
- Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61. doi: 10.1037/a0018066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
- Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd ed., pp. 795–814). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Oxford, England: Harpers.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being. The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar