Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 579–592 | Cite as

Perceived Change in Life Satisfaction and Daily Negative Affect: The Moderating Role of Purpose in Life

  • Anthony L. Burrow
  • Rachel Sumner
  • Anthony D. Ong
Research Paper

Abstract

Perceiving changes in life satisfaction has been linked to diminished health and well-being. Purpose in life is theorized to promote well-being by providing a sense of personal consistency, which may buffer the negative consequences of perceived change. Using data from the Midlife in the United States study, a cluster analysis was performed to explore profiles of adults’ (N = 1,746) ratings of life satisfaction for their past, present, and future. The analysis yielded three distinct profiles: continuous high, incremental, and decremental. Relative to the other profiles, decremental adults reported greater levels and variability of negative affect in everyday life. However, purpose moderated these effects such that no between-profile differences in negative affect level or variability were detected for adults reporting greater levels of purpose. Purpose is discussed as an asset for promoting positive adjustment in adulthood.

Keywords

Purpose in life Perceived change Life satisfaction Daily negative affect 

References

  1. Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84, 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful experiences (DISE): An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2002). The pursuit of meaningfulness in life. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 608–618). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Boehm, J. K., Peterson, C., Kivimaki, M., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2011). Heart health when life is satisfying: Evidence from the Whitehall II cohort study. European Heart Journal, 32, 2672–2677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Zhang, N., & Noll, J. G. (2005). Grief processing and deliberate grief avoidance: A prospective comparison of bereaved spouses and parents in the United States and the people’s republic of china. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrow, A. L., & Hill, P. L. (2011). Purpose as a form of identity capital for positive youth adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1196–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Busseri, M. A., Choma, B. L., & Sadava, S. W. (2009). Functional or fantasy? Examining the implications of subjective temporal perspective “trajectories” for life satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H., & Charles, S. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charles, S. T., & Pasupathi, M. (2003). Age-related patterns of variability in self descriptions: Implications for everyday affective experience. Psychology and Aging, 18, 524–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2008). Positive psychological well-being and mortality: A quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Fujita, F., Tay, L., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2012). Purpose, mood, and pleasure in prediction satisfaction judgements. Social Indicators Research, 105, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 17, pp. 304–324)., Focus on emotion and adult development New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Suh, M., Lucas, E., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hair, J. F., & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147–205). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  20. Kashdan, T. B., & McKnight, P. E. (2009). Origins of purpose in life: Refining our understanding of a life well lived. Psychological Topics, 18, 303–316.Google Scholar
  21. Keyes, C. L. M. (2000). Subjective change and its consequences for emotional well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 24, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keyes, C. L. M. (2011). Authentic purpose: The spiritual infrastructure of life. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keyes, C. L. M., & Ryff, C. D. (2000). Subjective change and mental health: A self-concept theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Re-examining adaptation and the setpoint model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mather, M., & Knight, M. R. (2005). Goal-directed memory: The role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional memory. Psychology and Aging, 20, 554–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mroczek, D. K., & Almeida, D. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72, 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction over 20 years during adulthood: Findings from the VA normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. A., & Congdon, P. (2008). HLM: Hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling (version 6.34g) [computer software]. Lincoln, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  30. Röcke, C., & Lachmann, M. E. (2008). Perceived trajectories of life satisfaction: Profiles and correlates of subjective change in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 23, 833–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony L. Burrow
    • 1
  • Rachel Sumner
    • 1
  • Anthony D. Ong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations