Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1813–1838 | Cite as

Analysing the Simultaneous Relationship Between Life Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life

  • Silvia GarridoEmail author
  • Ildefonso Méndez
  • José-María Abellán
Research Paper

Abstract

Keywords

Life satisfaction Subjective well-being Satisfaction with life scale Health-related quality of life SF-6D Simultaneous equations system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from Dirección General de Planificación, Ordenación Sanitaria y Farmacéutica e Investigación, Autonomous Community of Region of Murcia, Spain. Silvia Garrido and José María Abellán also acknowledge financial support from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación grant ECO2010-22041-C02-02. No conflict of interest is reported.

References

  1. Abellán, J. M., Sánchez, F. I., Martínez, J. E., & Méndez, I. (2012). Lowering the ‘floor’ of the SF-6D scoring algorithm using a lottery equivalent method. Health Economics, 21, 1271–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Windi, A. (2005). The relations between symptoms, somatic and psychiatric conditions, life satisfaction and perceived health. A primary care based study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1,700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(5), 815–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrindell, W. A., Meeuwesen, L., & Huyse, F. J. (1991). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(2), 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arthaud-Day, M., Rode, J., Mooney, C., & Near, J. (2005). The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 445–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benyamini, Y., Leventhal, H., & Leventhal, E. A. E. A. (2004). Self-rated oral health as an independent predictor of self-rated general health, self-esteem and life satisfaction. Social Science and Medicine, 59(5), 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Briere, N. M. (1989). L‘Echelle de satisfaction de vie: Validation Canadienne-Francaise du satisfaction with life scale (French-Canadian validation of the satisfaction with life scale). Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bobinac, A., van Exel, J., Rutten, F., & Brouwer, W. (2010). Caring for and caring about: Disentangling the caregiver effect and the family effect. Journal of Health Economics, 29(4), 549–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Böckerman, P., & Ilmakunnas, P. (2009). Unemployment and self-assessed health: Evidence from panel data. Health Economics, 18(2), 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Böckerman, P., Johansson, E., & Saarni, S. I. (2011). Do established health-related quality-of-life measures adequately capture the impact of chronic conditions on subjective well-being? Health Policy, 100(1), 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brazier, J., Deverill, M., Green, C., Harper, R., & Booth, A. (1999). A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment, 3(9), i–iv, 1–164.Google Scholar
  14. Brazier, J., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Busschbach, J. (2004). A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Economics, 13(9), 873–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brazier, J., Usherwood, T., Harper, R., & Thomas, K. (1998). Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 health survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1115–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfaction. New York: Russell.Google Scholar
  20. Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 17(1), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Corso, P. S., Hammitt, J. K., Graham, J. D., Dicker, R. C., & Goldie, S. J. (2002). Assessing preferences for prevention versus treatment using willingness to pay. Medical Decision Making, 22(5 Suppl), S92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cubí-Mollá, P., & Herrero, C. (2012). Quality of life lost due to non-fatal road traffic injuries. Health Economics, 21(5), 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment. Evidence from surveys of happiness. The American Economic Review, 91(1), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (2006). Understanding scores on the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Copyright by Ed Diener, February 13, 2006. Available at: http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/SWLS.html.
  30. Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy a review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. European Commission (2011). Eurobarometer Survey. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm.
  34. EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feeny, D. (2000). A utility approach to the assessment of health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl), II-151–II-154.Google Scholar
  36. Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., et al. (2002). Multi attribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ferraro, K. F., & Albrecht-Jensen, C. M. (1991). Does religion influence adult health? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(2), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferreira, L., Ferreira, P., Pereira, L., & Brazier, J. (2008). An application of the SF-6D to create heath values in Portuguese working age adults. Journal of Medical Economics, 11(2), 215–233.Google Scholar
  39. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Franks, P., Gold, M. R., & Fiscella, K. (2003). Socio demographics, self-rated health, and mortality in the US. Social Science and Medicine, 56(12), 2505–2514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fraser, G. E. (1999). Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-day Adventists. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70(3 Suppl), 532S–538S.Google Scholar
  42. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. García-Gómez, P. (2011). Institutions, health shocks and labour market outcomes across Europe. Journal of Health Economics, 30(1), 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. British Medical Journal, 324(7351), 1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. George, L. K., & Landerman, R. (1984). Health and subjective well-being: A replicated secondary data analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19(2), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gerdtham, U.-G., & Johannesson, M. (2001). The relationship between happiness, health and socio-economic factors: Results based on Swedish micro data. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(1), 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Graham, C., Higuera, L., & Lora, E. (2011). Which health conditions cause the most unhappiness? Health Economics, 20(12), 1431–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grandy, S., & Fox, K. M. (2012). Change in health status (EQ-5D) over 5 years among individuals with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus in the SHIELD longitudinal study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grieve, R., Grishchenko, M., & Cairns, J. (2009). SF-6D versus EQ-5D: Reasons for differences in utility scores and impact on reported cost-utility. The European Journal of Health Economics, 10(1), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Grundmann, E. (1992). Cancer morbidity and mortality in USA mormons and seventh-day adventists. Archives of Anatomy Citology and Pathology, 40(2–3), 73–78.Google Scholar
  51. Hatoum, H., Brazier, J., & Akhras, K. (2004). Comparison of the HUI3 with the SF-36 preference based SF-6D in a clinical trial setting. Value in Health, 7(5), 602–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Heady, B., Schupp, J., Tucci, I., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). Authentic happiness theory supported by impact of religion on life satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis with data for Germany. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3915.Google Scholar
  53. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Helliwell, J. F. (2011). How can subjective well-being be improved? Papers in honour of Ian Stewart. In F. Gorbet & A. Sharpe (Eds.), New directions for intelligent government in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Centre for the Study of Living Standards.Google Scholar
  55. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 359, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hultell, D., & Petter Gustavsson, J. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1070–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Johannesson, M., & Johansson, P.-O. (1997). Is the valuation of a QALY gained independent of age? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Health Economics, 16(5), 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kalsekar, I., Wagner, J. S., Dibonaventura, M., Bates, J., Forbes, R., & Hebden, T. (2012). Comparison of health-related quality of life among patients using atypical antipsychotics for treatment of depression: Results from the National Health and Wellness Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(3), 261–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kind, P., Dolan, P., Gudex, C., & Williams, A. (1998). Variations in population health status: Results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 316(7133), 736–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kwan, K. Y. (2010). Life satisfaction and self-assessed health among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  64. Longworth, L., & Bryan, S. (2003). An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients. Health Economics, 12(12), 1061–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lubetkin, E. I., Jia, H., Franks, P., & Gold, M. R. (2005). Relationship among socio demographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: Examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2187–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marra, C., Woolcott, J., Kopec, J., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J., et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science and Medicine, 60(7), 1571–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Martínez-Granado, M., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2002). The decisions of Spanish youth: A cross-section study. Journal of Population Economics, 15(2), 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Miller, L., Davies, M., & Greenwald, S. (2000). Religiosity and substance use and abuse among adolescents in the National Comorbidity Survey. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(9), 1190–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. National Statistics Institute (2006). National Health Survey 2006. Available at: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t15/p419&file=inebase&L=1.
  71. National Statistics Institute (2009). Living Conditions Survey. Available at: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t25/p453&file=inebase.
  72. O’Brien, B., Spath, M., Blackhouse, G., Severens, J., Dorian, P., & Brazier, J. (2003). A view from the bridge: Agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. Health Economics, 12(11), 975–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2009). Religiosity and life satisfaction across nations. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Okun, M. A., & George, L. K. (1984). Physician- and self-ratings of health, neuroticism and subjective well-being among men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(5), 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Oswald, A. J., & Powdthavee, N. (2008). Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1061–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with life scale. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being (Social Indicators Research Series) (Vol. 39, pp. 101–117). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Petrou, S., & Hockley, C. (2005). An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population. Health Economics, 14(11), 1169–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schwappach, D. L. B. (2003). The equivalence of numbers: The social value of avoiding health decline: An experimental web-based study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Siahpush, M., Spittal, M., & Singh, K. (2008). Happiness and life satisfaction prospectively predict self-rated health, physical health, and the presence of limiting, long-term health conditions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 23(1), 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spanish Centre for Sociological Research (2001). Latinobarometer 2001. Available at: http://www.cis.es/cis/opencms/EN/index.html.
  83. Stiggelbout, A. M. (2006). Health state classification systems: How comparable are our cost-effectiveness ratios? Medical Decision Making, 26(3), 223–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available at: www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr [24 May 2011].
  85. Ubel, P. A. (1999). How stable are people’s preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients? Social Science and Medicine, 49(7), 895–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. van den Berg, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2007). Monetary valuation of informal care: The well-being valuation method. Health Economics, 16(11), 1227–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Veenhoven, R. (1984). The concept of happiness. In R. Veenhoven (Ed.), Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on happiness. Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective wellbeing, an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 7–26). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  89. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations. Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations 1946–1992. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  90. Vilagut, G., Ferrer, M., Rajmil, L., Rebollo, P., Permanyer-Miralda, G., Quintana, J. M., et al. (2005). The Spanish version of the Short Form 36 health survey: A decade of experience and new developments. Gaceta Sanitaria, 19(2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walters, S., & Brazier, J. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(4).Google Scholar
  92. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  93. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user’s manual. Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
  94. Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). The SF36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
  96. World Health Organization (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June 1946, signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 states (Official Records of the World Health Organization, No. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.Google Scholar
  97. World Values Survey Association (2005–2008). World Values Survey, Wave 5. Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
  98. Zellner, A., & Theil, H. (1962). Three-stage least squares: Simultaneous estimation of eimultaneous equations. Econometrica, 30(1), 54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Garrido
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ildefonso Méndez
    • 1
  • José-María Abellán
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Economics and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Campus Mare Nostrum’University of MurciaMurciaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Economía AplicadaFacultad de Economía y EmpresaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations