A Population Study of Victimization, Relationships, and Well-Being in Middle Childhood
The paper presents a population-based study on the association of victimization and peer and adult relationships with children’s life satisfaction, self-esteem, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The study extends previous research by examining 2-, 3-, and 4-way higher-order interaction effects (moderation hypotheses) of adults and peer relationships, victimization, and gender on positive and negative aspects of children’s well-being. The study draws from a representative population-level sample of 2,792 4th graders (Mage = 9.70 years; 48.2 % girls). Data were obtained via student self-report survey on the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI). Given the nested data (children within classrooms), we employed multi-level regression analyses. Positive relationships with adults and peers were most strongly associated with life satisfaction and self-esteem, whereas victimization was most strongly associated with depressive symptoms and anxiety. No significant 2- or 3-way interactions were identified. The 4-way interaction of gender, adult connectedness, peer connectedness, and victimization was significant for three outcomes; that is, victimization was particularly strongly associated with low life satisfaction, low self-esteem, and high depressive symptoms for girls with low self-reports of peer and adult connectedness. The findings have implications for promoting children’s well-being in school and community contexts, corroborating interventions that foster relationship-building skills and simultaneously reduce victimization.
KeywordsChildren Life satisfaction Well-being Depressive symptoms Anxiety Social relationships with adults and peers Victimization Population-based study
Middle Years Development Instrument
- Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Constantine, N. A., & Benard, B. (2001). California healthy kids survey resilience assessment model: Technical report. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute.Google Scholar
- Dill, E. J., Vernberg, E. M., Fonagy, P., Twemlow, S. W., & Gamm, B. K. (2004). Negative affect in victimized children: the role of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and attitudes toward bullying. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 159–173. doi:10.1023/B:JACP.0000019768.31348.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future of Children, 9, 30–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602703.
- Hayden-Thomson, L. K. (1989). Children’s loneliness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- Holder, M. D. (2012). Why study children’s and adult’s well-being, including their happiness? In Happiness in children: Measurement, correlates, and enhancement of positive subjective well-being. Springer Briefs in Well-being and Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4414-1_2.
- Kusche, C. A., Greenberg, M. T., & Beilke, R. (1988). Seattle Personality Questionnaire for young school-aged children. Unpublished manuscript. University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Seattle.Google Scholar
- Luthar, S. S. (2005). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 740–795). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W. (1988). Self-Description Questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Murray-Close, D., Ostrov, J. M., & Crick, N. (2007). A short-term longitudinal study of growth of relational aggression during middle childhood: Associations with gender, friendship intimacy, and internalizing problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 187–203. doi:10.1017/S0954579407070101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nishina, A., Juvonen, J., & Witkow, M. R. (2005). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will make me feel sick: The psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 37–48. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rains, C. (2003). Seattle Personality Questionnaire—original (Fast Track Project Technical Report). Retrieved sanford.duke.edu/centers/child/fasttrack/techrept/s/spq/spq3tech.pdf.Google Scholar
- Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Guhn, M., Hymel, S., Hertzman, C., Sweiss, L., Gadermann, A. M., et al. (2010). Our children’s voices: The middle years development instrument. Measuring the developmental health and well-being of children in middle childhood. Vancouver, Canada: United Way. Retrieved from http://earlylearning.ubc.ca/media/uploads/publications/mdi_our_childrens_voices_report.pdf.
- Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38, 735–747.Google Scholar
- WestEd. (2011). California healthy kids survey. Retrieved from http://chks.wested.org/administer/download.