Procedural and Distributive Justice Beliefs for Self and Others: Multilevel Associations with Life Satisfaction and Self-Rated Health
- 643 Downloads
Personal happiness and well-being are associated with a dispositional tendency to believe in the existence of justice. In addition, research suggests that links between justice beliefs and well-being are best revealed when utilizing distinctions between a belief in justice for one’s self versus others, and also a belief in procedural versus distributive justice. Using multilevel modeling, we examined whether individual-level links to personal well-being are moderated by higher-order (county-level) justice climates. Michigan (United States) residents (N = 497) were recruited through a statewide survey to complete measures of procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others, life satisfaction, and self-rated health. Individual-level beliefs in justice for both self and for others were more strongly associated with life satisfaction and health in climates where beliefs about justice for others were robust. In addition, an individual-level belief in distributive justice was more strongly linked to self-rated health in high distributive justice climates, and in low procedural justice climates. Taken together, these cross-level interactions suggest that higher-order justice climates may alter relationships between individual-level justice beliefs and personal well-being. We discuss implications for justice theory and directions for continued research on well-being and happiness.
KeywordsHealth Well-being Life satisfaction Justice beliefs Justice climate Belief in a just world Procedural justice Distributive justice
This research was supported in part by the annual Statewide Survey of Michigan Residents conducted by the Center for Urban Studies (Wayne State University).
- Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Baltes, B. B. (2001). Psychological climate in the work-setting. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 18, pp. 12355–12359). New York, NY: Elsevier (Pergamon).Google Scholar
- Dalbert, C. (2009). Belief in a just world. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 288–297). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hegtvedt, K. A., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 257–280). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Jetten, J., Haslam, C., & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.). (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Materialistic values: Their causes and consequences. In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world (pp. 11–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lucas, T., & Goold, S. (2008). Exploring the malleability of belief in a just world: Evidence from a health resource allocation exercise. Psychology Journal, 5, 92–104.Google Scholar
- Lucas, T., & Wendorf, C. A. (2012). Perceived justice and worker well-being. How and for whom do unethical work practices matter? In R. A. Giacalone & M. D. Promislo (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for individual well-being (pp. 237–252). New York: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
- McClintock, C. G., & van Avermaet, E. (1982). Social values and rules of fairness: A theoretical perspective. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 43–71). New York: Academic press.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & Du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Roberts, J. K. (2007, April). Group dependency in the presence of small intraclass correlation coefficients: An argument in favor of not interpreting the ICC. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Attending to continuity and organizational goals. In S. Srivastva & R. E. Fry (Eds.), Executive and organizational continuity: Managing the paradoxes of stability and change (pp. 101–131). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
- Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). State & county quickfacts. Retrieved August 24, 2012, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/26000.html.
- Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar