Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 1379–1408 | Cite as

Are Relative-Income Effects Constant Across the Well-Being Distribution?

Research Paper

Abstract

This paper challenges the common assumption made by economists to date that income comparisons are similarly important in different segments of the subjective well-being (SWB) distribution. The results, based on the 2000–2007 waves of the German SOEP and on a Generalized Ordered Probit for panel data, show that relative income, as measured either by the mean income of the reference group or the individual ordinal ranking within the group, exerts a differential effect across SWB levels. Such divergence is assessed by means of the tradeoff ratio between household income and the relative income variables. The results show that a low rank and falling below the average income in one’s group are significant determinants of low SWB but largely irrelevant when accounting for high SWB. The fact that conditionally unhappy individuals are more sensitive to comparisons, particularly if they are unfavorable, is consistent with earlier laboratory studies in the field of psychology.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Comparison income Income rank Generalized ordered response model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Education through grant SEJ2006-11067 and the Junta de Andalucía through grant P07-SEJ-03261 is gratefully acknowledged. Part of this research was developed during a research visit at the Department of Economics of the University of Verona. The author thanks the faculty members for their warm hospitality.

References

  1. Abel, A. (2008). Equity premia with benchmark levels of consumption: Closed-form results. In R. Mehra (Ed.), Handbook of the equity risk premium (pp. 117–157). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 708–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blázquez, M., & Budría, S. (2011). Deprivation and subjective well-being: Evidence from panel data. Economic Analysis Working Paper Series 8/2011, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  5. Boes, S., & Winkelmann, R. (2009). The effect of income on general life satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 95, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bound, J., Jaeger, D., & Baker, R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443–450.Google Scholar
  7. Boyce, C. J. (2010). Understanding fixed effects in human well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyce, C., Brown, G., & Moore, S. (2010). Money and happiness: rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21(4), 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, G., Gardner, J., & Oswald, A. (2008). Does wage rank affect employees’ well-being? Industrial Relations, 47(3), 355–389.Google Scholar
  10. Budría, S., & Díaz-Giménez, J. (2007). Economic inequality in Spain: The European Union household panel dataset. Spanish Economic Review, 9, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cacioppo, J., Hawkley, L. C., Kalil, A., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L., & Thisted, R. A. (2008). Happiness and the invisible threads of social connection: The Chicago health, aging and social relations study. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, J., & Cochrane, J. (1999). By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate shock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), 205–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, C., Overland, J., & Weil, D. (2000). Saving and growth with habit formation. American Economic Review, 90(3), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008a). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118(529), 222–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008b). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, A., Kristensen, N., & Westergaard-Nielsen, N. (2009a). Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, A., Kristensen, N., & Westergaard-Nielsen, N. (2009b). Job satisfaction and co-worker wages: Status or signal? Economic Journal, 119(536), 430–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, A. E., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M.-C. (2010). Effort and comparison income. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63, 407–426.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, A., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality traits from 80 to 12. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 219–237). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. D’Ambrosio, C., & Frick, J. (2012). Individual well-being in a dynamic perspective. Economica, 79, 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Danner, D., Snowdon, D. A., & Friesen, W. V. (2001). Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings from the nun study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 804–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dehne, M., & Schupp, J. (2007). Personlichkeitsmerkmale im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP): Konzept, Umsetzung und empirische Eigenschaften. DIW Berlin, Research Note 26.Google Scholar
  26. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Díaz, A., Pijoan-Mas, J., & Ríos-Rull, J. V. (2003). Precautionary savings and wealth distribution under habit formation preferences. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(6), 1257–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Dittmann, J., & Goebel, J. (2010). Your house, your car, your education: The socioeconomic situation of the neighborhood and its impact on life satisfaction in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 96, 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Falk, A., & Knell, M. (2004). Choosing the joneses: Endogenous goals and reference standards. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison. Income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fuhrer, J. C. (2000). Habit formation in consumption and its implications formonetary policy models. American Economic Review, 90(3), 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graham, C., Eggers, A., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55, 319–342.Google Scholar
  36. Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2010). How’s the job? Well-being and social capital in the workplace. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(2).Google Scholar
  37. Huppert, F. A., & Whittington, J. E. (2003). Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: Implications for quality of life assessment. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Judge, T., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knight, J., Song, L., & Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review, 20(4), 635–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larsen, R., & Prizmic, Z. (2008). Regulation of emotional well-being: Overcoming the hedonic treadmill. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lockwood, P. (2002). Could it happen to you? Predicting the impact of downward comparisons on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbours as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.Google Scholar
  43. Lyubomirsky, S., & Ross, L. (1997). Hedonic consequences of social comparison: A contrast of happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1141–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lyubomirsky, S., & Tucker, K. L. (1998). Implications of individual differences in subjective happiness for perceiving, interpreting and thinking about life events. Motivation and emotion, 22, 155–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lyubomirsky, S., Tucker, K. L., & Kasri, F. (2001). Responses to hedonically conflicting social comparisons: Comparing happy and unhappy people. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McBride, M. (2001). Relative income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mueller, G., & Plug, E. (2006). Estimating the effect of personality on male-female earnings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  48. Oswald, A., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the USA. Science, 327(5965), 576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Powdthavee, N. (2009). How important is rank to individual perception of economic standing? A within-community analysis. Journal of Economic Inequality, 7(3), 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Powdthavee, N. (2010). How much does money really matter? Estimating the causal effects of income on happiness. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 77–92.Google Scholar
  52. Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of Anthropololy, 33, 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seidlitz, L., Wyer, R. S., & Diener, E. (1997). Cognitive correlates of subjective well-being: The processing of valenced life events by happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Senik, C. (2004). When information dominates comparison: Learning from Russian subjective panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2099–2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Senik, C. (2005). What can we learn from subjective data? The case of income and well-being. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Senik, C. (2009). Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van der Zee, K., Oldersma, F., Buunk, B., & Bos, D. (1998). Social comparison preferences among cancer patients as related to neuroticism and social comparison orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology, 75, 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2008). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2010). Happiness economics: A new road to measuring and comparing happiness. Foundation and Trends in Microeconomics, 6(1), 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 760–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wood, J. V., & Van der Zee, K. (1997). Social comparisons among cancer patients: Under what conditions are comparisons upward and downward? In B. P. Buunk & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping, and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 299–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. Zizzo, D. J. (2002). Between utility and cognition: The neurobiology of relative position. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 748, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEEAplA and IZAFunchalPortugal

Personalised recommendations