Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 689–707 | Cite as

The Affective Temperaments and Well-Being: Swedish and Iranian Adolescents’ Life Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being

  • Danilo GarciaEmail author
  • Saleh Moradi
Research Paper

Abstract

The aim was to investigate the role of the affective temperament model (AFTs) in distinguishing variations in well-being among adolescents from Sweden (n = 222) and Iran (n = 120). Participants self-reported positive (PA) and negative affect (NA), life satisfaction (LS) and psychological well-being (PWB). The model categorizes participants in four different temperaments using the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): self-actualizing (high PA and low NA), high affective (high PA and high NA), low affective (low PA and low NA), and self-destructive (low PA and high NA). Across cultures, self-actualizing adolescents reported higher LS and PWB. The PWB sub-scale of self-acceptance was positively related to LS regardless of temperament profile or cultural background. Nevertheless, Iranian adolescents with self-destructive profiles reported higher LS than high affective Iranians. The AFTs model is suggested to offer something unique by taking into account the interaction of PA and NA.

Keywords

Adolescence Affective temperaments Life satisfaction Positive affect Psychological well-being Negative affect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

As the first author I would like to thank The Stiftelsen Kempe-Carlgrenska Fonden for supporting the development of this paper. Both authors are indebted to the participants for their help in facilitating the study and to Reza Molaei, Hasan Kiaei, and Azar Taheri for assistance with the Iranian data. Appreciation is also directed to the reviewers and Professor Trevor Archer at the Department of Psychology for his most valuable support and encouraging words. Last but not least we would like to thank to the late Agneta Brimse at the Forensic Psychiatry Research Group for editorial help: Agneta you will be missed!

References

  1. Archer, T., Adrianson, L., Plancak, A., & Karlsson, E. (2007). Influence of affective personality on cognitive-mediated emotional processing: Need for empowerment. European Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 21–44.Google Scholar
  2. Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T., & King, L. A. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke, P. J., Marshall, V. M., Ryff, C. D., & Wheaton, B. (2001). Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian study of health and aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 13, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00354.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25–41.Google Scholar
  11. Fogle, L. M., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2002). The relationship between temperament and life satisfaction in early adolescence: Cognitive and behavioral mediation models. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 373–392. doi: 10.1023/A:1021883830847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 85–103). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Funk, B. A, I. I. I., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2006). Reliability and validity of a brief life satisfaction scale with a high school sample. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 41–54. doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-0869-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia, D. (2011a). Interpretation and Recognition for Words in a Short Story (IRWSS) [Database record]. Retrieved from the American Psychological Association’s PsycTESTS .Google Scholar
  17. Garcia, D. (2011b). Adolescents’ happiness: The role of the affective temperament model on memory and apprehension of events, subjective well-being, and psychological well-being (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Gothenburg, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  18. Garcia, D. (2011c). Two models of personality and well-being among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1208–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia, D. (2011d). The affective temperaments: Differences between adolescents in the big five model and cloninger’s psychobiological model of personality. Journal of Happiness Studies,. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9303-5.Google Scholar
  20. Garcia, D. (2011e). Happy today, happy tomorrow: The (non-)effect of temporal distance on life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1048–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia, D. (2012). The affective temperaments and self-acceptance: Adolescents’ life satisfaction and psychological well-being. In M. Vassar (Ed.), The psychology of life satisfaction. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Garcia, D., & Archer, T. (2012). Adolescent life satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Alternative Medicine Research. Manuscript in press.Google Scholar
  23. Garcia, D., Archer, T., Moradi, S., & Andersson-Arntén, A-C. (2012). Exercise frequency, high activation positive affect, and psychological well-being: Beyond age, gender, and occupation. Psychology. Manuscript in press.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia, D., Ghiabi, B., Moradi, S., Siddiqui, A., & Archer, T. (2012b). The happy personality: A tale of two philosophies. In N. Gotsiridze-Columbus (Ed.), Psychology of personality. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Garcia, D., Kerekes, N., Andersson-Arntén, A-C., & Archer, T. (2012). Temperament, character, and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: Focusing on affect. Manuscript under editorial evaluation.Google Scholar
  26. Garcia, D., & Moradi, S. (2011). Adolescents’ temperament and character: A longitudinal study on happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies,. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9300-8.Google Scholar
  27. Garcia, D., Rosenberg, P., Erlandsson, A., & Siddiqui, A. (2010). On lions and adolescents: Affective temperaments and the influence of negative stimuli on memory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 477–495. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9153-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garcia, D., & Siddiqui, A. (2009a). Adolescents’ affective temperaments: Life satisfaction, interpretation and memory of events. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 155–167. doi: 10.1080/17439760802399349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia, D., & Siddiqui, A. (2009b). Adolescents’ psychological well-being and memory for life events: Influences on life satisfaction with respect to temperamental dispositions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387–503. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9096-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. González, M., Casas, F., & Coenders, G. (2007). A complexity approach to psychological well-being in adolescence: Major strengths and methodological issues. Social Indicators Research, 80, 267–295. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-5073-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gunderson, J. G., Triebwasser, J., Phillips, K. A., & Sullivan, C. N. (1999). Personality and vulnerability to affective disorders. In C. R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 3–32). New York: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Harter, S., Marold, D. B., Whitesell, N. R., & Cobbs, G. (1996). A model of the effects of perceived parent and peer support on adolescent false self behavior. Child Development, 67, 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12, 231–240. doi: 10.1177/0143034391123010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huebner, E. S., & Dew, T. (1995). Preliminary validation of the positive and negative affect schedule with adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 286–293. doi: 10.1177/073428299501300307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jokar, B., Samani, S., & Sahragard, N. (2007). Resilience, psychological health, and life satisfaction. Journal of Psychiatric and Clinical Psychology of Iran, 50, 290–295.Google Scholar
  36. Joshanloo, M., & Ghaedi, G. (2009). Value priorities as predicators of hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 294–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300. doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-7226-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., et al. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005a). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 6, 803–855. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005b). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Magen, Z. (1998). Exploring adolescent happiness. Commitment, purpose and fulfillment. London: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, K. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2007). Peer victimization and prosocial experiences and emotional well-being of middle school students. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 199–208. doi: 10.1002/pits.20216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCullough, G., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. M. (2000). Life events, self-concept, and adolescents’ positive subjective well-being. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 1, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norlander, T., Bood, S. A., & Archer, T. (2002). Performance during stress: Affective personality age, and regularity of physical exercise. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norlander, T., Johansson, Å., & Bood, S.-Å. (2005). The affective personality: Its relation to quality of sleep, well-being and stress. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 709–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orviska, M., Caplanova, A., & Hudson, J. (2012). The impact of democracy on well-being. Social Indicators Research,. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-9997-8.Google Scholar
  51. Palomo, T., Kostrzewa, R. M., Beninger, R. J., & Archer, T. (2007). Treatment consideration and manifest complexity in comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurotoxicity Research, 12, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pavot, W. (2008). The assessment of subjective well-being: Successes and shortfalls. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 124–167). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  53. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 2, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009a). Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 583–630. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9110-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009b). Youth life satisfaction measures: A review. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 128–144. doi: 10.1080/17439760802650816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reschly, A. M., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J., & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 419–431. doi: 10.1002/pits.20306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rothbart, M. K., & Jones, L. B. (1998). Temperament, self-regulation, and education. School Psychology Review, 27, 479–491.Google Scholar
  58. Rusell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1259–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryan, R. M., & Huta, V. (2009). Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking (response to the kashdan et al. and Waterman discussion). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 202–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryff, C. D., Keyes, C. L. M., & Shmotkin, D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schimmack, U. (2007). Methodological issues in the assessment of the affective component of subjective well-being. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. Van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 96–110). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (1997). Affect intensity: Separating intensity and frequency in repeatedly measured affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1313–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  68. Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2003). Adolescents’ emotion regulation in daily life: Links to depressive symptoms and problem behavior. Child Development, 74, 1869–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tellegen, A. (1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 320–333. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Urry, H. L., Nitschke, J. B., Dolski, I., Jackson, D. C., Dalton, K. M., Mueller, C. J., et al. (2004). Making life worth living: Neural correlates of well-being. Psychological Science, 15, 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—expanded form. Boise, IA: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
  75. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Windle, M., & Windle, R. C. (2006). Adolescent temperament and lifetime psychiatric and substance abuse disorders assessed in young adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authentic scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11, 705–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Forensic Psychiatry Research GroupUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations