Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 931–946 | Cite as

Adolescents’ Temperament and Character: A Longitudinal Study on Happiness

  • Danilo GarciaEmail author
  • Saleh Moradi
Research Paper

Abstract

Personality is considered a major determinant of adults and adolescents Subjective Well-Being (SWB); mainly due to its relation to emotional reactivity, emotional intensity, and to the duration of emotional reactions. However, personality as presented above involves almost only differences in automatic emotional reactions and habits (i.e., temperament). Nevertheless, temperament together with learning experiences from different life events is responsible for what people make of themselves intentionally (i.e., character). The present study examines the relation between temperament and character to SWB at two points in time over a year in an adolescent sample (N = 109). Adolescents reported personality (The Temperament and Character Inventory; TCI) and SWB at the beginning of the school year (T1). Subjective Well-Being was then again measured at the end of the school year (T2). Temperament (Harm Avoidance and Novelty Seeking) and character (Self-Directedness) predicted SWB at T1. However, only Self-Directedness predicted SWB at T2 and also small but significant changes in SWB at the end of the school year. The inclusion of character in SWB research is discussed.

Keywords

Adolescents Character Cloninger’s psychobiological model of personality Happiness Subjective well-being Temperament and character inventory Temperament 

Notes

Acknowledgments

As the first author I would like to convey my gratitude to the Adlerbert Research Foundation for supporting the writing of the present article. I would also like to thank Professor Robert Cloninger at Washington University in St. Louis, Sören Sigvardsson at Umeå University, Sven Brändström, Anver Siddiqui, and Professor Trevor Archer at University of Gothenburg for their most valued help with the Temperament and Character Inventory and comments on this paper. Last but not least I would like to direct my appreciation to Kristiina Möller at Linnaeus University for her important comments and helpful suggestions on the first draft of the present article. Both authors would like to thank the participants who made the study possible, the reviewers who helped to improve the original manuscript, and to Dr. Antonella Delle Fave for her encouraging words and open-mindedness.

References

  1. Ali, M., & Ali, H. Y. (2005). The soul of a butterfly—Reflections on life’s journey. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, T., Adrianson, L., Plancak, A., & Karlsson, E. (2007). Influence of affective personality on cognitive-mediated emotional processing: Need for empowerment. European Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 21–44.Google Scholar
  4. Asch, M., Cortese, S., Perez Diaz, F., Pelissolo, A., Aubron, V., Orejarena, S., et al. (2009). Psychometric properties of a French version of the junior temperament and character inventory. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 18, 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ash, C., & Huebner, E. S. (2001). Environmental events and life satisfaction reports of adolescents: A test of cognitive mediation. School Psychology International, 22, 320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance. Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brändström, S., Richter, J., & Nylander, P.-O. (2003). Further development of the temperament and character inventory. Psychological Reports, 93, 995–1002.Google Scholar
  8. Brändström, S., Richter, J., & Przybeck, T. (2001). Distributions by age and sex of the dimensions of temperament and character inventory in a cross-cultural perspective among Sweden, Germany, and the USA. Psychological Reports, 89, 747–758.Google Scholar
  9. Brändström, S., Schlette, P., Przybeck, T. R., Lundberg, M., Forsgren, T., Sigvardsson, S., et al. (1998). Swedish normative data on personality using the temperament and character inventory. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 39, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brändström, S., Sigvardsson, S., Nylander, P.-O., & Richter, J. (2008). The Swedish version of the temperament and character inventory (TCI)—A cross-validation of age and gender influences. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: The science of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cloninger, C. R. (2006). Fostering spirituality and well-being in clinical practice. Psychiatric Annals, 36, 1–6.Google Scholar
  14. Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The temperament and character inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis: Washington University Center for Psychobiology of Personality.Google Scholar
  15. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. De Fruyt, F., Van De Wiele, L., & Van Heeringen, C. (2000). Cloninger’s psychobiological model of temperament and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Difference, 29, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). A happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Fogle, L. M., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2002). The relationship between temperament and life satisfaction in early adolescence: Cognitive and behavioral mediation models. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garcia, D. (2011a). Two models of personality and well-being among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1208–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garcia, D. (2011b). Happy today, happy tomorrow: The (non-)effect of temporal distance on life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1048–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.031.
  28. Garcia, D. (2011c). The affective temperaments: Differences between adolescents in the big five model and Cloninger’s psychobiological models of personality (manuscript under evaluation).Google Scholar
  29. Garcia, D., & Erlandsson, A. (2010). The relationship between personality and subjective well-being: Different association patterns when measuring the affective component in frequency and intensity. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9242-6.
  30. Garcia, D., Rosenberg, P., Erlandsson, A., & Siddiqui, A. (2010). On lions and adolescents: Affective temperaments and the influence of negative stimuli on memory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 477–495. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9153-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garcia, D., Rosenberg, P., & Siddiqui, A. (2011). Tomorrow I could be in trouble…but the sun will come out next year: The effect of temporal distance on adolescents’ judgments of life satisfaction. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 751–757. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garcia, D., & Siddiqui, A. (2009a). Adolescents’ psychological well-being and memory for life events: Influences on life satisfaction with respect to temperamental dispositions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387–503. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9096-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garcia, D., & Siddiqui, A. (2009b). Adolescents’ affective temperaments: Life satisfaction, interpretation and memory of events. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 155–167. doi: 10.1080/17439760802399349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gunderson, J. G., Triebwasser, J., Phillips, K. A., & Sullivan, C. N. (1999). Personality and vulnerability to affective disorders. In C. R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 3–32). New York: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. Huebner, E. S. (1991a). Correlates of life satisfaction in children. School Psychology Quarterly, 6, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huebner, E. S. (1991b). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction. School Psychology International, 12, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huebner, E. S., & Dew, T. (1995). Preliminary validation of the positive and negative affect schedule with adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., Smith, L. C., & McKnight, C. (2004). Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for children and youth. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelley, A. E., Schochet, T., & Landry, C. F. (2004). Risk taking and novelty seeking in adolescence: Introduction to part I. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larsen, R. J., & Eid, M. (2008). Ed Diener and the science of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 1–13). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., et al. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luby, J. L., & Svrakic, D. M. (1999). The junior temperament and character inventory: Preliminary validation of a child self-report measure. Psychological Reports, 84, 1127–1138.Google Scholar
  45. Lucas, R. E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 171–194). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Magen, Z. (1996). Commitment beyond self and adolescence: The issue of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 37, 235–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Magen, Z. (1998). Exploring adolescent happiness. Commitment, purpose and fulfillment. London: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, K. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2007). Peer victimization and prosocial experiences and emotional well-being of middle school students. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McCullough, G., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. M. (2000). Life events, self-concept, and adolescents’ positive subjective well-being. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mounts, N. S., & Steinberg, L. (1995). An ecological analysis of peer influence on adolescent grade point average and drug use. Developmental Psychology, 31, 915–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palomo, T., Kostrzewa, R. M., Beninger, R. J., & Archer, T. (2007). Treatment consideration and manifest complexity in comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurotoxicity Research, 12, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction measures: A review. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 583–630.Google Scholar
  55. Rigby, B. T., & Huebner, E. S. (2005). Do causal attributions mediate the relationship between personality characteristics and life satisfaction in adolescence? Psychology in the Schools, 42, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schmeck, K., Goth, K., Poustka, F., & Cloninger, R. C. (2001). Reliability and validity of the Junior Temperament and Character Inventory. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 10, 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N., Ferguson, Y., Gunz, A., Houser-Marko, L., Nichols, C. P., et al. (2010). Persistent pursuit of need-satisfying goals leads to increased happiness: A 6-month experimental longitudinal study. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1319–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The ‘Big Three’ of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the ‘Big Three’ explanations of suffering. In M. Brandt & Paul Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–172). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stewart, M. E., Ebmeier, K. P., & Deary, I. J. (2005). Personality correlates of happiness and sadness: EPQ-R and TPQ compared. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1085–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Is extremely high life satisfaction during adolescence advantageous? Social Indicators Research, 78, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Urberg, K. A., Değirmencioğlu, S. M., Tolson, J. M., & Halliday-Scher, K. (1995). The structure of adolescent peer networks. Developmental Psychology, 31, 540–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Urberg, K. A., Lou, Q., Pilgrim, C., & Değirmencioğlu, S. M. (2003). A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: Individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1243–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vittersø, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 903–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authentic scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Forensic Psychiatry, The Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgHisings Backa, GothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations