Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 875–899 | Cite as

Does Government Make People Happy?: Exploring New Research Directions for Government’s Roles in Happiness

  • Seoyong KimEmail author
  • Donggeun Kim
Research Paper

Abstract

Our study aims to explore new directions for researches on government’s role in enhancing quality of life (QOL). Although government can influence, to the greatest extent, people’s happiness, very few studies have systemically examined the quantitative or qualitative attributes of government in happiness enhancement, compared with the large volume of studies on economic, political, and cultural factors’ impact on QOL. Related to government’s role in happiness, we suggest ‘nine new research directions,’ all of which can generally be related with its’ quantitative and qualitative attributes. Even though much existing researches have focused on a part of quantitative sides of government, there are still many remaining attributes to be highlighted. Moreover, we expect that new, composite and nonlinear quality attributes of government will provide bountiful research topics in the future. Also, cross-boundary comparisons and mixtures between quality and quantity, as well as the conditional macro-context for government’s role, suggest new ideas for QOL studies.

Keywords

Happiness Life satisfaction Quality of government Size of government 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by research grant from The Guwon Scholarship Foundation. I thank Dr. Whang Pillsang, a founder of the foundation, for his thoughtful consideration for Ajou University.

References

  1. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. (2007). The bigger the better?: evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, 130, 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coggburn, J. D., & Schneider, S. K. (2003). The relationship between state government performance and state quality of life. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(12), 1337–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Commander, S., Davoodi, H. R., & Lee, U. J. (1997). The causes of government and the consequences for growth and well-being. Policy Research Working Paper Series 1785, World Bank.Google Scholar
  4. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2005). Partisan social happiness. Review of Economic Studies, 72(2), 367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E., Deiner, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterlin, R. A. (1973). Does money buy happiness? Pubic Interests, 30, 3–10.Google Scholar
  7. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eiji, Y. (2009). The Influence of government size on economic growth and life satisfaction: a case study from Japan. MPRA Paper No. 17879.Google Scholar
  9. Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hessami, Z. (2010). The size and composition of government spending in Europe and its impact on well-being. MPRA Paper No.21195.Google Scholar
  12. Highum, E. (2006). Political economy and ‘quality of life’ in the early twenty-first century: economic versus political factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, California, USA, March 22 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Highum, E. (2008). Economic growth, government expenditures and quality of life in developing and transitioning states: testing the modernization theory of development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA’s 49th Annual Convention, San Francisco, USA, Mar 26 2008.Google Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness. Perspective on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kacapyr, E. (2008). Cross-country determinants of satisfaction with life. International Journal of Social Economics, 35, 400–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotakorpi, K., & Laamanen, J. P. (2010). Welfare state and life satisfaction: Evidence from public health care. Economica, 33(307), 565–583.Google Scholar
  17. Lapinski, J. S., Riemann, C. R., Shapiro, R. Y., Stevens, M. F., & Jacobs, L. R. (1998). Welfare state regimes and subjective well-being: A cross-national study. International Journal of Public Opinion, 10(1), 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD (1997, 2009). OECD economic outlook. Paris: OECDGoogle Scholar
  19. Ott, J. (2005). Level and inequality of happiness in nations: Does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ott, J. (2010). Good governance and happiness in nations: Technical quality precedes democracy and quality beats size. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ott, J. (2011). Government and happiness in 130 nations: Good governance foresters higher level and more equality of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 102, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets and life satisfaction: The political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 939–952.Google Scholar
  23. Ram, R. (2009). Government spending and happiness of the population: Additional evidence from large cross-country samples. Public Choice, 138(3), 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scully, G. W. (2001). Government expenditure and quality of life. Public Choice, 108, 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. O. (2002). Subjective well-being across cultures. online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 7, Chapter 1). International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. http://orpc.iaccp.org/.
  26. Tavits, M. (2007). Representation, corruption and subjective well-being. Comparative Political Studies, 41(12), 1607–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Teorell, J., Charron, N., Samanni, M., Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (2011). The Quality of Government Dataset, version 6 Apr 11. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, http://www.qog.pol.gu.se.
  28. Veenhoven, R. (2005). Well-being in the welfare state: level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2, 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationAjou UniversitySuwonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsAjou UniversitySuwonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations