Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 565–578 | Cite as

Linking Adult Attachment Styles to Relationship Satisfaction in Hong Kong and the United States: The Mediating Role of Personal and Structural Commitment

  • Man Yee Ho
  • Sylvia Xiaohua Chen
  • Michael Harris Bond
  • Chin Ming Hui
  • Clare Chan
  • Michael Friedman
Article

Abstract

Maintaining a satisfying heterosexual relationship is important to many individuals’ happiness and physical health. Evolutionary theories on the formation of relationships suggest that adult attachment and relationship commitment are universal mechanisms for securing and maintaining such mating relationships. This study sought to understand how these two mechanisms may link to each other and how they in turn contribute to relationship satisfaction with one’s current partner in Hong Kong Chinese and American cultures. Similarities in the model for relationship satisfaction were found among young dating couples in the United States and Hong Kong. Specifically, attachment anxiety was positively linked to structural commitment, whereas attachment avoidance was negatively related to personal commitment. Both dimensions of attachment (anxiety and avoidance) and both components of commitment (personal and structural) were found to predict current relationship satisfaction significantly and equivalently across cultures, with the pathway from attachment avoidance to current relationship satisfaction similarly mediated by personal commitment in both cultural groups. These results were interpreted in terms of a probable universal logic informing the interpersonal dynamics involving attachment and relationship commitment.

Keywords

Adult attachment Relationship commitment Relationship satisfaction and culture 

References

  1. Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1177–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bersoff, D. M., & Miller, J. G. (1993). Culture, context, and the development of moral accountability judgments. Developmental Psychology, 29, 664–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besser, A., & Priel, B. (2008). Attachment, depression, and fear of death in older adults: The roles of neediness and perceived availability of social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1711–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birnie, C., Joy, M., Lydon, J. E., & Holmberg, D. (2009). Attachment avoidance and commitment aversion: A script for relationship failure. Personal Relationships, 19, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London, England: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  7. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brennan, K. A., Shaver, P. R., & Clark, C. L. (2000). Specifying some mediators of attachment-related anxiety and avoidance. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York College at Brockport.Google Scholar
  9. Cann, A., Norman, M. A., Welbourne, J. L., & Calhoun, L. G. (2008). Attachment styles, conflict styles and humour styles: Interrelationships and associations with relationship satisfaction. European Journal of Personality, 22, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coan, J. A. (2010). Adult attachment and the brain. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, A. J., Gable, S. L., & Mapes, R. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feeney, B. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment styles as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feeney, B. C., & Thrush, R. L. (2010). Relationship influences on exploration in adulthood: The characteristics and function of a secure base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraley, R. C., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Marks, M. J. (2005). The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, E., & Brandstatter, V. (2002). Approach versus avoidance: Different types of commitment in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74, 175–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Godwin, R., & Findlay, C. (1997). “We were just fated together”…Chinese love and the concept of yuan in England and Hong Kong. Personality Relationships, 4, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossmann, K. E., Grossmann, K., & Kepler, A. (2005). Universal and culture-specific aspects of human behavior: The case of attachment. In W. Friedlmeier, P. Chakkarath, & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research for the social sciences (pp. 75–97). Hove, England: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, M. P. (1991). Commitment to personal relationships. In W. H. Jones & D. W. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 117–143). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, M. P. (1999). Personal, moral, and structural commitment to relationships: Experiences of choice and constraint. In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 73–87). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, J. T., & Cunningham, J. D. (1996). Attachment styles and other predictors of relationship satisfaction in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 4, 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelley, H. H. (1983). Love and commitment. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 265–314). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  31. King, A. Y. C., & Bond, M. H. (1985). The Confucian paradigm of man. In W. S. Tseng & D. Y. H. Wu (Eds.), Chinese culture and mental health: An overview (pp. 29–45). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kruger, D. J., & Schlemmer, E. (2009). Male scarcity is differentially related to male marital likelihood across the life course. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 280–287.Google Scholar
  33. Kurdek, L. A. (2000). Attractions and constraints as determinants of relationship commitment: Longitudinal evidence from gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples. Personal Relationships, 7, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lydon, J. E. (1999). Commitment and adversity: A reciprocal relationship. In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 193–203). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lydon, J. E., Meana, M., Sepinwall, D., Richards, N., & Mayman, S. (1999). The commitment calibration hypothesis: When do people devalue attractive alternatives? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lydon, J. E., Pierce, T., & O’Regan, S. (1997). Coping with moral commitment to long-distance dating relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mallinckrodt, B., & Wang, C. C. (2004). Quantitative methods for verifying semantic equivalence of translated research instruments: A Chinese version of the experiences in close relationships scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 368–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markman, H., Stanley, S., & Blumberg, S. L. (1994). Fighting for your marriage. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. A. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyers, S. A., & Landsberger, S. A. (2002). Direct and indirect pathways between adult attachment style and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pistole, M. C., Clark, E. M., & Tubbs, A. L. (1995). Love relationships: Attachment style and the investment model. Journal of Mental Health counseling, 17, 199–209.Google Scholar
  43. Pistole, M. C., & Vocaturo, L. C. (1999). Attachment and commitment in college students’ romantic relationships. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 710–720.Google Scholar
  44. Ramirez, A., Jr. (2008). An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis of the effect of relational maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 943–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothbaum, F., & Tsang, B. Y. P. (1998). Love songs in the United States and China: On the nature of romantic love. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Moreli, G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55, 1093–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rusbult, C. E., & Verette, J. (1991). An interdependence analysis of accommodation processes in close relationships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 19, 3–33.Google Scholar
  49. Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schindler, I., Fagundes, C. P., & Murdock, K. W. (2010). Predictors of romantic relationship formation: Attachment style, prior relationships and dating goals. Personal Relationships, 17, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  53. van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi, A. (1999). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 713–734). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  54. Wang, Q., & Chang, L. (2010). Parenting and child socialization in contemporary China. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 53–68). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wang, C. C. D., & Matlinckrodt, B. S. (2006). Differences between Taiwanese and US cultural beliefs about ideal adult attachment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 192–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, prorelationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wong, C. M. (2009). Effect of religion and religiosity on romantic relationship: Love values and relationship satisfaction (Undergraduate thesis, City University of Hong Kong). Retrieved from http://www.oapsportal.org/handle/123456789/130.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Man Yee Ho
    • 1
  • Sylvia Xiaohua Chen
    • 2
  • Michael Harris Bond
    • 2
  • Chin Ming Hui
    • 3
  • Clare Chan
    • 1
  • Michael Friedman
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong SAR, China
  2. 2.The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong
  3. 3.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  4. 4.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations