Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 455–467 | Cite as

Predicting Well-Being From Personality in Adolescents and Older Adults

  • Ana Butkovic
  • Irma Brkovic
  • Denis Bratko
Article

Abstract

The relationship between personality and well-being is dynamic and therefore should be examined within aging perspective. In study presented here we compared the prediction of well-being from personality in two samples–223 adolescents attending high-school (16–19 years; M = 16.94, SD = 0.51) and 134 older adults (54–90 years; M = 77.20, SD = 7.39) living in retirement home or at home. Different aspects of well-being were included in the study. Subjective well-being was measured with Index of Well-Being, but also self-esteem and loneliness were included as measures of psychological well-being. Personality (measured with FFPI; Hendriks et al. in Pers Individ Dif 27:307–325, 1999) significantly predicted indicators of well-being (Self-Esteem, Loneliness and Index of Well-Being) in both samples, with emotional stability and extraversion as most pronounced predictors. Personality explained more variance of well-being in adolescents than in older adults, and more variance in eudaimonic than hedonic aspects of well-being.

Keywords

Personality Well-Being Adolescents Older adults 

References

  1. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  3. De Fruyt, F., McCrae, R. R., & Szirmak, Z. (2004). The five-factor personality inventory as a measure of the five-factor model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 11, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck personality inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
  7. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck personality questionnaire (junior and adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  8. Gomez, V., Krings, F., Bangerter, A., & Grob, A. (2009). The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J., & Anglim, J. (2009). The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being. Psychological Reports, 105, 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999). The five-factor personality inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hendriks, A. A. J., Perugini, M., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Johnson, J. A., De Fruyt, F., et al. (2003). The five-factor personality inventory: Cross-cultural generalizability across 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17, 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 795–815). NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nes, R. B., Røysamb, E., Tambs, K., Harris, J. R., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2006). Subjective well-being: Genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychological Medicine, 36, 1033–1042.Google Scholar
  15. Orth, U., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2010). Self-esteem development from young adulthood to old age: A cohort-sequential longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 645–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perugini, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1998). Validity of the five factor personality inventory (FFPI): An investigation in Italy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2008). Behavioral genetics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta- analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robins, R. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2005). Self-esteem development across the lifespan. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tracy, J. L., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2002). Global self- esteem across the life-span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Russell, D., & Cutrona, C. E. (1988). Development and evolution of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  24. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryff, C. D. (1989b). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryff, C. D. (2008). Challenges and opportunities at the interface of aging, personality and well-being. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 399–421). NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vukasovic, T., Bratko, D., & Butkovic, A. (in press). Genetski doprinos individualnim razlikama u subjektivnoj dobrobiti: meta-analiza (Genetic contribution to individual differences in subjective well-being: meta-analysis). Drustvena istrazivanja.Google Scholar
  30. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations