Predicting Well-Being From Personality in Adolescents and Older Adults
- 958 Downloads
- 19 Citations
Abstract
The relationship between personality and well-being is dynamic and therefore should be examined within aging perspective. In study presented here we compared the prediction of well-being from personality in two samples–223 adolescents attending high-school (16–19 years; M = 16.94, SD = 0.51) and 134 older adults (54–90 years; M = 77.20, SD = 7.39) living in retirement home or at home. Different aspects of well-being were included in the study. Subjective well-being was measured with Index of Well-Being, but also self-esteem and loneliness were included as measures of psychological well-being. Personality (measured with FFPI; Hendriks et al. in Pers Individ Dif 27:307–325, 1999) significantly predicted indicators of well-being (Self-Esteem, Loneliness and Index of Well-Being) in both samples, with emotional stability and extraversion as most pronounced predictors. Personality explained more variance of well-being in adolescents than in older adults, and more variance in eudaimonic than hedonic aspects of well-being.
Keywords
Personality Well-Being Adolescents Older adultsReferences
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- De Fruyt, F., McCrae, R. R., & Szirmak, Z. (2004). The five-factor personality inventory as a measure of the five-factor model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 11, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck personality inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck personality questionnaire (junior and adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
- Gomez, V., Krings, F., Bangerter, A., & Grob, A. (2009). The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J., & Anglim, J. (2009). The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being. Psychological Reports, 105, 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999). The five-factor personality inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks, A. A. J., Perugini, M., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Johnson, J. A., De Fruyt, F., et al. (2003). The five-factor personality inventory: Cross-cultural generalizability across 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17, 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 795–815). NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Nes, R. B., Røysamb, E., Tambs, K., Harris, J. R., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2006). Subjective well-being: Genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychological Medicine, 36, 1033–1042.Google Scholar
- Orth, U., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2010). Self-esteem development from young adulthood to old age: A cohort-sequential longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 645–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perugini, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1998). Validity of the five factor personality inventory (FFPI): An investigation in Italy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2008). Behavioral genetics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
- Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta- analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robins, R. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2005). Self-esteem development across the lifespan. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tracy, J. L., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2002). Global self- esteem across the life-span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Russell, D., & Cutrona, C. E. (1988). Development and evolution of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryff, C. D. (1989b). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryff, C. D. (2008). Challenges and opportunities at the interface of aging, personality and well-being. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 399–421). NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vukasovic, T., Bratko, D., & Butkovic, A. (in press). Genetski doprinos individualnim razlikama u subjektivnoj dobrobiti: meta-analiza (Genetic contribution to individual differences in subjective well-being: meta-analysis). Drustvena istrazivanja.Google Scholar
- Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar