Optimism and Subjective Well-Being: Affectivity Plays a Secondary Role in the Relationship Between Optimism and Global Life Satisfaction in the Middle-Aged Women. Longitudinal and Cross-Cultural Findings
- 1.4k Downloads
The focus of the present study lies on optimism and its relationships to the components of subjective well-being, i.e. global life satisfaction, positive affect and negative affect. We investigated the direct and indirect (via affectivity) effects of optimism on global life satisfaction in the Swedish middleaged women at two time points (age 43 and 49), and in the Lithuanian middle-aged women. For this purpose, structural equation modelling was used and the fit indices were compared between two cognitive-affective models. The best fitting model suggests that the direct effect of optimism on global life satisfaction is stronger than that via affectivity. The result was found both in the Swedish sample at two time points and in the Lithuanian sample where the indirect effect was very low and insignificant. The indirect effect via negative affectivity was significant in the Swedish samples at both time points while the indirect effect via positive affectivity was low but significant only in the Swedish sample at age 43. In further analyses we studied the stability of optimism and the components of general SWB in the Swedish sample over a six-year period and a mean difference in optimism in two samples of women, Swedish and Lithuanian. Data analyses showed varying stability of the studied concepts with the highest stability coefficient being for negative affect and the lowest being for global life satisfaction. Cross-cultural analysis of mean difference in optimism showed that the Swedish women at age 43 reported significantly higher optimism as compared to their Lithuanian counterparts.
KeywordsOptimism Subjective well-being Life satisfaction Positive affect Negative affect Longitudinal
The authors thank Prof. Lars R. Bergman for the possibility to use data from the longitudinal research program—Individual Development and Adaptation (IDA). Daiva Daukantaitė thanks Vilmante Pakalniskiene for her helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The authors thank also two reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.
- Bergman, L. R. (2000). Women’s health, work, and education in a life-span perspective. Technical report 1: Theoretical background and overview of the data collection. Reports from the project individual development and adaptation, No. 70. Stockholm: Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002a). Optimism. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 231–243). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002b). Optimism, pessimism, and self-regulation. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism & pessimism. Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 31–52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Delhey, J. (2004). Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). Subjective well–being and age: An international analysis. In K. W. Schaie & M. p. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 17, pp. 304–324). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- EuroBarometer 69. Public Opinion in the European Union. Spring 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb69/eb69_lt_exe.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2010.
- Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Genes, culture, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures (pp. 165–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). Lisrel 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
- Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Kaprio, J., Honkanen, R. J., Viinamäki, H., and Koskenvuo, M. (2005). The stability of life satisfaction in a 15-year follow-up of adult Finns healthy at baselineBMC Psychiatry, 5 (4).Google Scholar
- Krueger, J., & Heckhausen, J. (1993). Personality development across the adult life span: Subjective conceptions vs cross-sectioinal contrasts. Journal of Gerontology, 48(3), P100–P108.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective. A longitudinal study, Vol. 1. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Paths through life. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rusting, C. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Foundations of hedonic psychology: Scientific perspectives on enjoyment and suffering (pp. 330–350). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Olàh, A. (2002). Positive traits: Flow and psychological immunity. Washington: Paper presented at the First International Positive Conference. DC.Google Scholar
- Räikkönen, K., Matthews, K. A., Flory, J. D., Owens, J. F., & Gump, B. B. (1999). Does optimism influence mood and ambulatory blood pressure during everyday life?: A study of middle-aged men and women using experiential sampling method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar