Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 877–885 | Cite as

Wanting more than you have and it’s Consequences for Well-being

Article

Abstract

Americans have a lot of stuff, but are not necessarily happier for it. One possibility is that even if we want what we have, we want more. Wanting more may increase have-want discrepancies and reduce well-being. In this paper, we introduce the construct wanting more, and show that it negatively predicts well-being. We then identify materialism as a mediator of this relationship. Wanting more negatively effects well-being at least in part because those who want more are more likely to be materialistic. Finally, we show that wanting more than one has and wanting what one has are distinct constructs, and that wanting what one has moderates the relationship between wanting more and well-being. Those who want more are less happy only if they also do not want what they have. Wanting what one has may reduce attention to have-want discrepancies that result from wanting more.

Keywords

Wanting more Happiness, well-being Materialism Have-want discrepancies Wanting what one has Desire fulfillment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Brad Stastny, Keith Dooley, and Paula Waddill for helpful comments on drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burroughs, J., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 348–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S. (2004). Self-regulation of action and affect. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 13–39). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiFranco, A. (2001). Grey. On revelling/reckoning [CD]. Buffalo, NY: Righteous Babe Records.Google Scholar
  11. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larsen, J. T., & McKibban, A. R. (2008). Is happiness having what you want, wanting what you have, or both? Psychological Science, 19, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leonard, A. (2010). The story of stuff. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nielsen Media Research (March 17, 2007). Average US home now receives a record 104.2 TV channels, according to Nielsen. Retrieved from http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/news/news_releases/2007/march/Average_U_S__Home_Now_Receives_A_Record_104_2_TV_Channels__According_to_Nielsen.
  17. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Pew research (2006). Luxury or necessity? Things we can’t live without: The list has grown in the last decade. Retrieved December 14, 2006 from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/323/luxury-or-necessity.
  19. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Stevenson, B. & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and happiness: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. NBER Working papers 14282, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. US Census Bureau (n.d.). Historical income tables. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/index.html.
  24. Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1193–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, J., & Wallendorf, M. (2006). Materialism, status signaling, and product satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 494–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMurray State UniversityMurrayUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology Texas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations