Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 763–777 | Cite as

Living with Ill-Health in Older Age: The Role of a Resilient Personality

  • Gill WindleEmail author
  • Robert T. Woods
  • David A. Markland
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper tests the hypothesis that a resilient personality moderates the impact of ill-health on subjective well-being. A cross-sectional survey drew a random sample of 1,847 people from England, Wales and Scotland aged between 50 and 90. Participants were interviewed face-to-face in their own homes. This paper examines demographic data, life satisfaction, psychological resources and ill-health. The direct and moderating effects were analysed using the method of multiple regression. Significant main effects of resilience and ill-health on life satisfaction were found in all of the age-groups. In three of these (60–69, 70–79 and 80–90) the addition of the interaction term was associated with a significant increase in the size of the effect, indicating a resilient self moderated the negative effect of ill-health on subjective well-being. Resilient resources can be a valuable mechanism for maintaining well-being and understanding differential resistance to, and recovery from ill-health in later life.

Keywords

Psychological resources Resilience Ill-health Subjective well-being Moderator 

References

  1. Atchley, R. C. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29(2), 183–190.Google Scholar
  2. Atchley, R. C. (1999). Continuity and adaptation in aging. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baltes, P. B. (1993). The aging mind: Potential and limits. The Gerontologist, 33(5), 580–594.Google Scholar
  4. Baltes, P. B., & Mayer, K. U. (1999). The Berlin aging study. Aging from 70 to 100. USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baltes, M. M., Mayer, U., Borchelt, M., Maas, I., & Wilms, H. U. (1999). Everyday competence in old and very old age: theoretical considerations and empirical findings. In P. B. Baltes, & K. U. Baltes (Eds.), The Berlin aging study. Aging from 70 to 100. USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beardslee, W. R. (1989). The role of self-understanding in resilient individuals: The development of a perspective. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59(2), 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A., & Vlahov, D. (2006). Psychological resilience after a disaster: New York City in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attack. Psychological Science, 17, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowling, A. (2004). A taxonomy and overview of quality of life. In J. Brown, A. Bowling, & T. Flynn (Eds.), Models of quality of life: A taxonomy, overview and systematic review of the literature. Sheffield University: European Forum on Population Ageing Research. Available online at http://www.ageingresearch.group.shef.ac.uk/pdf/qol_review_complete.pdf.
  10. Bowling, A., Farquhar, M., & Grundy, E. (1996). Associations with changes in life satisfaction among three samples of elderly people living at home. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 1077–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowling, A., Farquhar, M., Grundy, E., & Formby, J. (1993). Changes in life satisfaction over a two and a half year period among very elderly people living in London. Social Science and Medicine, 36(5), 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowling, A., Grundy, E., & Farquhar, M. (1997). Living well into old age. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Capara, G. V., Capara, M., & Steca, P. (2003). Personality’s correlates of adult development and aging. European Psychologist, 8(3), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, P. G. (1999). Identity mangement in later life. In R. T. Woods (Ed.), Psychological problems of ageing: Assessment, treatment and care. England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., & Suh, M. E. (1998). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 17, 304–324.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being; three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self esteem, neuroticism, locus of control and generalised self efficacy indiciators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kempen, G. I. J. M., van Heuvelen, M. J. G., van Sonderen, E., van den Brink, R. H. S., Kooijman, A. C., & Ormel, J. (1999). The relationship of functional limitations to disability and the moderating effects of psychological attributes in community dwelling older persons. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1161–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luthar, S. S. (1993). Annotation: Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Masten, A. S. (1999). Resilience comes of age: Reflections on the past and outlook for the next generation of research. In M. D. E. J. Glantz, & L. Jeannette (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations. Longitudinal research in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 281–296). USA: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Mclelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Navarro, A, B., Bueno, B., Buz, J., & Mayoral, P. (2006). Perceptión de autoeficacia en el afrontamiento de los problemas y su contributión en la satisfactión vital de las personas muy mayores [Perception of selfefficacy in coping with problems and its contribution to life satisfaction in very old people]. Revista Espanola De Geriatria y Gerontologia, 41(4), 222–227.Google Scholar
  25. Office for National Statistics. (1999). Social focus on older people. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  26. Office for National Statistics. (2005). Focus on older people. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  27. Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of health and social behaviour, 22, 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillpens, M., & Billet, J. (2006). Monitoring and evaluating non-response issues and fieldwork efforts in the European Social Survey. From http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_content&task= view&id=82&Itemid=126.
  29. Pinquart, M. (2001). Correlates of subjective health in older adults: A meta- analysis. Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 414–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rutter, M. (1995). Psychosocial adversity: Risk, resilience and recovery. Southern African Journal of Child & Adolescent, 7, 75–88.Google Scholar
  32. Schaie, K. W., & Hofer, S. M. (2001). Longitudinal studies in aging research. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (Vol. 5, pp. 53–77). California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Scottish Executive. (2005). Well-being and quality of life: Measuring the benefits of culture and sport: A literature review and think piece. Scottish Executive Social Research: From http://www.scotland.gov.uk/.
  34. Scottish Executive. (2006). Strategy for Scotland’s ageing population: Omnibus survey findings. Scotland: Scottish Executive Social Research.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemas of the fourth age. Paper presented at the Valencia Forum.Google Scholar
  36. Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Many reasons speak against it, yet many people feel good: The paradox of subjective well-being. Psychologische Rundschau, 51(4), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Townsend, P. (2001). Targeting poor health. Cardiff: The National Assembly for Wales.Google Scholar
  38. Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. Journal of Nursing Measurements, 1, 165–178.Google Scholar
  39. Windle, G., Markland, D. A., & Woods, B. (2008). Examination of a theoretical model of psychological resilience in older age. Aging and Mental Health, 12(3), 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wood, V., Wylie, M. L., & Scheafor, B. (1969). An analysis of a short self-report measure of life satisfaction: Correlation with rater judgements. Journal of Gerontology, 24, 465–469.Google Scholar
  41. World Health Organisation. (2002). Active ageing. A policy framework. World Health Organisation, from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gill Windle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert T. Woods
    • 1
  • David A. Markland
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Medical and Social Care ResearchBangor UniversityBangorUK
  2. 2.School of Sport, Health and Exercise SciencesBangor UniversityBangorUK

Personalised recommendations