Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Subjective Wellbeing, Homeostatically Protected Mood and Depression: A Synthesis

Research Paper

Abstract

This paper concerns the idea that Subjective Wellbeing (SWB) is managed by a system of psychological devices which have evolved for this purpose. It is proposed that this management is actually directed at the protection of Homeostatically Protected Mood, as the major component of SWB. We normally experience HPMood as a combination of contentment, happiness and positive arousal. A theoretical description of this construct is offered that can account for many of the commonly observed empirical characteristics of SWB data. It is further proposed that when homeostasis fails, due to the overwhelming nature of a negative challenge, people lose contact with HPMood and experience the domination of negative rather than positive affect. If this condition is chronic, people experience the clinical condition we call depression.

Keywords

Subjective Wellbeing HPMood Depression Happiness Homeostasis 

Notes

Acknowledgment

I thank Ann-Marie James for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript and Australian Unity for their continued support of this research. We also acknowledge the key role played by Renee Bear, Wendy Kennedy and Melissa Weinberg in coining the term Homeostatically Protected Mood.

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, J. R., Campagnolo, D. I., & Hoeman, S. (1991). Life satisfaction of individuals with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy using long-term mechanical ventilatory support. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bat-Chava, Y. (1994). Group identification and self-esteem of deaf adults. Personality and Social Psychology Behavior, 20(5), 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blore, J. D. (2008). Subjective Wellbeing: An Assessment of Competing Theories. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H. M., Hale, J. M. S., & Reb, J. (2003). The structure of affect: Reconsidering the relationship between negative and positive affectivity. Journal of Management, 29(6), 831–858.Google Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. A. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Personal income and subjective well-being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A., & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Singapore: National University of Singapore. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/PWI/2000-QOL_in_Cities-Likert_Scales-ss.doc.
  13. Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A model of subjective well being homeostasis: The role of personality. In E. Gullone & R. A. Cummins (Eds.), The universality of subjective wellbeing indicators: Social Indicators Research Series (pp. 7–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. A., Hughes, J., Tomyn, A., Gibson, A., Woerner, J., & Lai, L. (2007). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 17.1 The Wellbeing of Australians - Carer Health and Wellbeing. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
  15. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Gibson, A., Lai, L., Weinberg, M., & Collard, J. (2008). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 19.0. The Wellbeing of Australians—Links with exercise, nicotine and alcohol. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. ISBN 978 1 74156 113 5. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
  17. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Gibson, A., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., & Chester, M. (2009). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 21.0. The Wellbeing of Australians—Gambling, Chocolate and Swine Flu. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. ISBN 978 1 74156 125 8. Retrieved September 2 2009, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
  18. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Tomyn, A., Knapp, T., & Gibson, A. (2005). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 14.0—“The Wellbeing of Australians—Personal Relationships”. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
  19. Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine facilitation of incentive motivation and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E. D., Napa Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: the multifaceted nature of happiness. In P. T. Costa & I. C. Siegler (Eds.), Recent Advances in Psychology and Aging (pp. 187–219). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E. D., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forgas, J. P. (2008). The strange cognitive benefits of mild dysphoria: On the evolutionary advantages of not being too happy. In J. P. Forgas, M. G. Haselton, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology and Social cognition (pp. 107–121). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanestad, B. R., & Albrektsen, G. (1992). The stability of quality of life experience in people with Type 1 diabetes over a period of a year. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Headey, B. (2008). The set-point theory of well-being: Negative results and consequent revisions. Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Headey, B., Holmstrom, E., & Wearing, A. (1984a). The impact of life events and changes in domain satisfactions on well-being. Social Indicators Research, 15, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Headey, B., Holmstrom, E., & Wearing, A. (1984b). Well-being and ill-being: Different dimensions? Social Indicators Research, 14, 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1986). The sense of relative superiority- central to well-being. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  30. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1987). A theory of life satisfaction and psychological distress. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  31. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1988). The sense of relative superiority—central to well-being. Social Indicators Research, 20, 497–516.Google Scholar
  32. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henderson, S. (1977). The social network, support and neurosis. The function of attachment in adult life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index Manual. Melbourne, Australia: Deain University. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.
  35. Jones, L. V., & Thurstone, L. L. (1955). The psychophysics of semantics: An experimental investigation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 39(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kozma, A., Stone, S., & Stones, M. J. (2000). Stability in components and predictors of subjective well-being (SWB): Implications for SWB structure. In E. Diener & D. R. Rahtz (Eds.), Advances in quality of life: Theory and research (pp. 13–30). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Liu, B. (1975). Quality of life: Concept, measure and results. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 34, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of Subjective Well-Being: Does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nieboer, A. P. (1997). Life Events and well-being: A prospective study on changes in well-being of elderly people due to a serious illness event or death of the spouse. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Ormel, J. (1983). Neuroticism and well-being inventories. Measuring traits or states? Psychological Medicine, 13, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ormel, J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1991). Stability and change in psychological distress and their relationship with self-esteem and locus of control: A dynamic equilibrium mode. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition & Emotion, 1464–0600.Google Scholar
  50. Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. (1990). Social support: The search for theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 137–147.Google Scholar
  51. Stones, M. J., & Kozma, A. (1991). A magical model of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 25, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sweeny, K., Carroll, P. J., & Sheppard, J. A. (2006). Is optimism always best? Future outlooks and preparedness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tesser, A., Pilkington, C. J., & McIntosh, W. D. (1989). Self-evaluation maintenance and the mediational role of emotion: The perception of friends and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 442–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trigger, D. (2003). Does the way we measure poverty matter? University of Canberra: National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling.Google Scholar
  56. Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246, 1232–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. World Bank. (1997). World Values Surveys; GNP/capita purchasing power estimates from World Bank, World Development Report, 1997. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://margaux.grandvinum.se/SebTest/wvs/articles/folder_published/article_base_56.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations