Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 663–682 | Cite as

Gender Differences in the Incidence of Depression and Anxiety: Econometric Evidence from the USA

Research Paper

Abstract

Using data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) for the United States for the period 2001–2003, this paper addresses a vexed question relating to inter-gender differences in depression rates, namely how much of the observed difference in depression rates between men and women may be explained by differences between them in their exposure, and how much may be explained by differences between them in their response, to depression-inducing factors. The contribution of this paper is to propose a method for disentangling these two influences and to apply it to US data. The central conclusion of the paper was differences between men and women in rates of depression and anxiety were largely to be explained by differences in their responses to depression-inducing factors: the percentage contribution of inter-gender response differences to explaining the overall difference in inter-gender probabilities of being depressed was 93 percent for “sad, empty type depression”; 92 percent for “very discouraged” type depression; and 69 percent for “loss of interest” type depression.

Keywords

Gender Depression Anxiety Decomposition 

References

  1. Alegria, M., Jackson, J. S., Kessler, R. C., & Takeuchi, D. (2007). Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), 2001–2003 [United States] [Computer file]. ICPSR20240-v5, Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center [producer], 2007. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-06-19.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2002). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA, NBER working papers, no. 7487. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  3. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural Estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böckerman, P., & Ilmakunnas, P. (2009). Unemployment and self-assessed health: Evidence from panel data. Health Economics, 18, 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borooah, V. K. (2006). What makes people happy? Some evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 427–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borooah, V. K., & Iyer, S. (2005). The decomposition of inter-group differences in a logit model: Extending the Oaxaca–Blinder approach with an application to school enrolment in India. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 30, 279–293.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A. E. (1996). Job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E. (1999). Are wages habit forming? Evidence from micro data. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 39, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A. E. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics, 8, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118, F222–F243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Culbertson, F. M. (1997). Depression and gender: An international review. American Psychologist, 52, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunlop, D. D., Song, J., Lyons, J. S., Manheim, L. M., & Chang, R. W. (2003). Racial/ethnic differences in rates of depression among preretirement adults. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1945–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). “Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
  15. Easterlin, R. A. (1987). Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Frank, R. H. (1997). The frame of reference as a public good. Economic Journal, 107, 1832–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Money and happiness in an era of excess. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hirsch, F. (1976). The social limits to growth. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., et al. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8–19.Google Scholar
  23. Layard, R. (2002). Rethinking public economics: Implications of rivalry and habit. Centre for Economic Performance, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  24. Layard, R. (2003). Happiness: Has social science a clue? Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures 2002/3, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  25. Layard, R. (2006). The depression report: A new deal for depression and anxiety disorders, Centre for Economic Performance, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  26. Mangan, J. (2000). Workers without traditional employment: An international study of non-standard work. Cheltenhan: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Meltzer, H., Gill, B., Petticrew, M., & Hinds, K. (1995). OCPS surveys of psychiatric morbidity in Great Britain, Report 1: The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  28. Murakumi, J. (2002). Gender and depression: Explaining the different rates of depression between men and women. Perspectives in Psychology, 5, 27–34.Google Scholar
  29. Nielsen, H. S. (1998). Discrimination and detailed decomposition in a logit model. Economics Letters, 61, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noel-Hoeksema, S. (1990). Sex differences in depression. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Noel-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Noel-Hoeksema, S., Larson, J., & Grayson, C. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1061–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14, 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oswald, A. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107, 1815–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piccinelli, M., & Wilkinson, G. (2000). Gender differences in depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Weiss, E. L., Longhurst, J. G., & Mazure, C. M. (1999). Childhood sexual abuse as a risk factor for depression in women: Psychosocial and neurobiological correlates. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 816–828.Google Scholar
  38. Weissman, M. M., Bland, R. C., Canino, G. J., Faravelli, C., Greenwald, S., Hwu, H.-G., et al. (1996). Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of UlsterAntrimNorthern Ireland, UK

Personalised recommendations