Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 95–111

A Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Evaluation of the Purpose in Life Test: Preliminary Psychometric Support for a Replicable Two-Factor Model

Research Paper


This study’s purpose was to use confirmatory factor analysis to compare published factor-analytic models of the 20-item Purpose in Life test (PIL) to identify the one that provides the best fit to the data. To date many different models have been described, with limited evidence to support whether they are replicable. This study utilized data from undergraduates (= 620) from a medium-sized university located in the southern United States. Ten different PIL models were tested, with support found for the two-factor model (exciting life, purposeful life) of Morgan and Farsides. Recommendations and implications for research are provided.


Logotherapy Meaning Purpose in life PIL Confirmatory factor analysis 


  1. Aiken, L. W., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2006). Psychological testing and assessment (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–135). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1988). Measuring meaning in life: An examination of three scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 589–596. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(88)90157-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  12. Crumbaugh, J. C. (1977a). Manual of instructions: The Seeking of Noetic Goals test (SONG). Abilene, TX: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy.Google Scholar
  13. Crumbaugh, J. C. (1977b). The Seeking of Noetic Goals test (SONG): A complementary scale to the purpose in life test (PIL). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 900–907. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197707)33:3<900::AID-JCLP2270330362>3.0.CO;2-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Henrion, R. (1988). The PIL test: Administration, interpretation, uses, theory and critique. International Forum for Logotherapy, 11, 76–88.Google Scholar
  15. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 200–207. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(196404)20:2<200::AID-JCLP2270200203>3.0.CO;2-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1969). Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test. Abilene, TX: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy.Google Scholar
  17. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. DeVogler, K. L., & Ebersole, P. (1980). Categorization of college students’ meaning of life. Psychological Reports, 46, 387–390.Google Scholar
  19. Dufton, B. D., & Perlman, D. (1986). The association between religiosity and the purpose-in-life test: Does it reflect purpose or satisfaction? Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14, 42–48.Google Scholar
  20. Dyck, M. J. (1987). Assessing logotherapeutic constructs: Conceptual and psychometric status of the purpose in life and seeking of noetic goals tests. Clinical Psychology Review, 7, 439–447. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(87)90021-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness—The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 4–17. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiske, D. W. (1971). Measuring the concepts of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Frankl, V. E. (1959/1985). Man’s search for meaning (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frankl, V. E. (2004). On the theory and therapy of mental disorders: An introduction to logotherapy and existential analysis (J. M. DuBois, Trans.). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge (Original work, 8th ed., published 1999).Google Scholar
  25. Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Steger, M. (2003). Assessing optimal human functioning. In W. B. Walsh (Ed.), Counseling psychology and optimal human functioning (pp. 251–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–161. doi:10.1007/BF02289162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hablas, R., & Hutzell, R. (1982). The Life Purpose Questionnaire: An alternative to the Purpose-in-Life test for geriatric, neuropsychiatric patients. In S. A. Wawrytko (Ed.), Analecta Frankliana: The proceedings of the First World Congress of Logotherapy: 1980 (pp. 211–215). Berkeley, CA: Strawberry Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Harlow, L. L., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1987). Purpose in life test assessment using latent variable methods. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 235–236.Google Scholar
  31. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hicks, J. A., & King, L. A. (2007). Meaning in life and seeing the big picture: Positive affect and global focus. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1577–1584. doi:10.1080/02699930701347304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hicks, J. A., & King, L. A. (2008). Religious commitment and positive mood as information about meaning in life. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 43–57. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness of fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 325–344. doi:10.1177/0049124183011003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 465–497). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hutzell, R. R. (1988). A review of the Purpose in Life test. International Forum for Logotherapy, 11, 89–101.Google Scholar
  38. Hutzell, R. R. (1989). Life Purpose Questionnaire overview sheet. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Logotherapy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago, IL: National Educational Resources.Google Scholar
  40. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  41. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415. doi:10.1007/BF02291817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kashdan, T. B., & Breen, W. E. (2007). Materialism and diminished well-being: Experiential avoidance as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 521–539. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.5.521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179–196. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  46. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. V., Umpress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, G. M., et al. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2. Stephenson, MD: American Professional Credentialing Services LLC.Google Scholar
  47. Laverty, W. H., Pringle-Nelson, C., Kelly, I. W., Miket, M. J., & Janzen, B. L. (2005). Expressions of life meaning among college students. Psychological Reports, 97, 945–954. doi:10.2466/PR0.97.7.945-954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904) “‘General intelligence’, objectively determined and measured”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lubinski, D. (2006). Ability tests. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 101–114). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marsh, A., Smith, L., Piek, J., & Saunders, B. (2003). The purpose in life scale: Psychometric properties for social drinkers and drinkers in alcohol treatment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 859–871.Google Scholar
  51. McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 494–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Melton, A. M. A., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2007). On the relationship between meaning in life and boredom proneness: Examining a logotherapy postulate. Psychological Reports, 101, 1016–1022. doi:10.2466/PR0.101.7.1016-1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Melton, A. M. A., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2008). On the measurement of meaning: Logotherapy’s empirical contributions to Humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 36, 31–44. doi:10.1080/08873260701828870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Molcar, C. C., & Stuempfig, D. W. (1988). Effects of world view on purpose in life. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 365–371.Google Scholar
  55. Morgan, J., & Farsides, T. (2007). Measuring meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9075-0.
  56. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Pöhlmann, K., Gruss, B., & Joraschky, P. (2006). Structural properties of personal meaning systems: A new approach to measuring meaning of life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 109–117. doi:10.1080/17439760600566008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12, 287–297. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reker, G. T. (2000). Theoretical perspective, dimensions, and measurement of existential meaning. In G. T. Reker & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Exploring existential meaning: Optimizing human development across the life span (pp. 39–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Reker, G. T., & Cousins, J. B. (1979). Factor structure, construct validity and reliability of the seeking of noetic goals (SONG) and purpose in life (PIL) tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 85–91. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197901)35:1<85::AID-JCLP2270350110>3.0.CO;2-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Robak, R. W., & Griffin, P. W. (2000). Purpose in life: What is its relationship to happiness, depression, and grieving? North American Journal of Psychology, 2, 113–120.Google Scholar
  62. Sato, F., & Tanaka, H. (1974). An experimental study on the existential aspect of life: I. The cross-cultural approach to purpose in life. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 33, 20–46.Google Scholar
  63. Schulenberg, S. E. (2004). A psychometric investigation of logotherapy measures and the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 477–492.Google Scholar
  64. Schulenberg, S. E., & Henrion, R. P. (2005). Logotherapy past, present, and future: A conversation with James C. Crumbaugh. International Forum for Logotherapy, 28, 65–71.Google Scholar
  65. Schulenberg, S. E., Hutzell, R. R., Nassif, C., & Rogina, J. M. Logotherapy for clinical practice. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training (in press).Google Scholar
  66. Shek, D. T. L. (1988). Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the purpose in life questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 384–392. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<384::AID-JCLP2270440312>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shek, D. T. L. (1992). Meaning in life and psychological well-being: An empirical study using the Chinese version of the purpose in life questionnaire. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 185–200.Google Scholar
  68. Shek, D. T. L. (1993). The Chinese purpose-in-life test and psychological well-being in Chinese college students. International Forum for Logotherapy, 16, 35–42.Google Scholar
  69. Shek, D. T. L., Hong, E. W., & Cheung, M. Y. P. (1987). The purpose in life questionnaire in a Chinese context. The Journal of Psychology, 121, 77–83.Google Scholar
  70. Sink, C. A., Van Keppel, J., & Purcell, M. (1998). Reliability estimates of the purpose in life and seeking of noetic goals tests with rural and metropolitan area adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 362.Google Scholar
  71. Smith, G. T., & McCarthy, D. M. (1995). Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 300–308. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Starck, P. L. (1983). Patients’ perceptions of the meaning of suffering. International Forum for Logotherapy, 6, 110–116.Google Scholar
  74. Starck, P. L. (1985). Guidelines-Meaning in Suffering Test. Abilene, TX: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy.Google Scholar
  75. Steger, M. F. (2006). An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 263–272. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Steger, M. F., & Kashdan, T. B. (2007). Stability and specificity of meaning in life and life satisfaction over one year. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 161–179. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9011-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Strack, K. M., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2008). The meaning in life questionnaire: A psychometric study with individuals with serious mental illness (submitted).Google Scholar
  80. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vogt, W. P. (2005). Dictionary of statistics & methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Waisberg, J. L., & Starr, M. W. (1999). Psychometric properties of the purpose in life test with a sample of substance abusers. International Forum for Logotherapy, 22, 22–26.Google Scholar
  83. Walters, L. H., & Klein, A. E. (1980). A cross-validated investigation of the Crumbaugh purpose-in-life test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 1065–1071. doi:10.1177/001316448004000434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The experiences in close relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.Google Scholar
  85. Wong, P. T. P., & Fry, P. S. (1998). The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  86. Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  87. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations