Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, 10:721 | Cite as

The Many Faces of Life Satisfaction among Finnish Young Adults’

  • Liisa MartikainenEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure the levels of general life satisfaction among Finnish young adults, and to clarify the way in which life satisfaction is constructed. In order to explore these aims, the following research questions were specified: (1) What is the level of general life satisfaction among young Finnish adults?, (2) Which factors in young adults’ phase of life and social surroundings are related to their life satisfaction?, (3) Is it possible to find distinct groups of young adults among whom life satisfaction can be seen as differently constructed? If so, in what way are those groups different from each other? What kinds of factors are related to group members’ life satisfaction? The data for the study were gathered via a questionnaire. The subjects consisted of 192 Finnish young adults born in 1968, living throughout the country. The results showed the level of life satisfaction among Finnish young adults to be similar to that of the Finnish population in general. The two main factors underlying life satisfaction were found to be social relation-ships and factors related to working-life contexts. In addition, the study identified five distinct groups (three groups of women, two groups of men) which differed from each other, both in their levels of life satisfaction and in the factors underlying life satisfaction. The groups varied in the importance for life satisfaction that they attached to marital partnerships, friends, health, and hobbies. The results were seen as supporting the assumption that life satisfaction is a socially constructed phenomenon.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Happiness Young adults Developmental tasks Socialization Lifespan 

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenium.Google Scholar
  2. Argyle, M., & Martin, M. (1991). The psychological causes of happiness. In F. Strack, M. Argyle & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 77–100). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (350 BC). Nicomachean ethics translated by W.D. Ross. http://www.constitution.org/ari/ethic_00.htm. Retrieved 14 June 2007.
  4. Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, R., & Corwyn, R. (2004). Life satisfaction among European American, African American, Mexican American, and Dominican American adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 385–400. doi: 10.1080/01650250444000072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Chickering, A. W., & Havighurst, R. J. (1981). Today’s students and their needs. In A. W. Chickering & Associates (Eds.), The modern American college. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Daly, M., & Rose, R. (2007). First European quality of life survey: Key findings from a policy perspective. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  10. Delhey, J. (2004). Life satisfaction in an enlarged Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  11. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157. doi: 10.1007/BF01207052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of the hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Napa, C. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill. The American Psychologist, 61, 305–314. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgements: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176. doi: 10.1023/A:1010031813405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2004). Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective well-being. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Asian economic and political issues (pp. 1–25). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. (2003). Personality, culture and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fogle, L., Scott, H., & Laughlin, J. (2002). The relationship between temperament and life satisfaction in early adolescence: Cognitive and behavioral mediation models. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 373–393. doi: 10.1023/A:1021883830847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty-second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20, 355–381. doi: 10.1007/BF00302333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furham, A., & Cheng, H. (2004). Perceived parental rearing style, self-esteem and self-criticism as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 1–21. doi: 10.1023/B:JOHS.0000021704.35267.05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glass, J. C., & Jolly, G. R. (1997). Satisfaction in later life among women 60 of over. Educational Gerontology, 23, 297–315. doi: 10.1080/0360127970230401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagberg, M., Hagberg, B., & Saveman, B.-I. (2002). The significance of personality factors for various dimensions of life quality among older people. Aging & Mental Health, 6, 178–186. doi: 10.1080/13607860220126754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  23. Helliwell, J. (2001). How ‘s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Queen’s International Institute on Social Policy. Kingston, CA-ON.Google Scholar
  24. Kainulainen, S. (1998). Elämäntapahtumat ja elämään tyytyväisyys eri sosiaaliluokissa [Life events and satisfaction with life in different social classes]. Kuopio: University of Kuopio.Google Scholar
  25. Karvonen, S. (2008). Hyvinvointi työikäisten kokemana [Well-being of Finnish working population]. In P. Moisio, S. Karvonen, J. Simpura & M. Heikkilä (Eds.), Suomalaisten hyvinvointi [Well-being of Finnish population] (pp. 96–1150). Helsinki: Stakes.Google Scholar
  26. King, L., & Smith, N. (2004). Gay and straight possible selves: Goals, identity, subjective well-being and personality development. Journal of Personality, 72, 967–985. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00287.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klonowicz, T. (2001). Discontented people: Reactivity and locus of control as determinants of subjective well-being. European Journal of Personality, 15, 29–48. doi: 10.1002/per.387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuusinen, J. (1997). Nuorten aikuisten kehitystehtävät, onnellisuus ja kehityksen hallinta [Developmental tasks, happiness and control over development in early adulthood]. In P. Lyytinen, M. Korkiakangas & H. Lyytinen (Eds.), Näkökulmia kehityspsykologiaan. Kehitys kontekstissaan Perspectives to the developmental psychology. Development and it’s context (pp. 311–322). Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
  29. Layard, R. (2003). Happiness: Has social science a clue? Paper presented at the Lionel Robbins Lectures. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Liao, P. S., Fu, Y. C., & Yi, C. C. (2005). Perceived quality of life in Taiwan and Hong-Kong: An intra-culture comparison. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 343–367. doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-1753-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu, L., & Hu, C. H. (2005). Personality, leisure experiences and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 325–342. doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-8628-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markus, H., Ryff, C., Curhan, K., & Palmersheim, K. (2004). In their own words: Well-being at midlife among high school-educated and college-educated adults. In O. Brim, C. Ryff & R. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we?: A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 273–319). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Martikainen, L. (2006). Suomalaisten nuorten aikuisten elämään tyytyväisyyden monet kasvot [The many faces of life satisfaction among Finnish young adult’s]. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research 287. University of Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  34. Mowbray, C., Bybee, D., Hollingsworth, L., Goodkind, S., & Oyserman, D. (2005). Living arrangements and social support: Effects on the well-being of mothers with mental illness. Social Work Research, 29, 41–56.Google Scholar
  35. Myers, D., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00298.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 157–184.Google Scholar
  37. Palmqvist, R., & Martikainen, L. (2005). Changes in reasons given for adolescent smoking, 1984–1999. Substance Use and Misuse, 40, 645–656. doi: 10.1081/JA-200055363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmqvist, R., Martikainen, L., & Rauste von Wright, M. (2003). A moving target: Reasons given for alcohol and narcotics use, 1984 and 1999. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 195–2003. doi: 10.1023/A:1022595403818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Park, N., & Huebner, E. S. (2005). A cross-cultural study of the levels and correlates of life satisfaction among adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 444–456. doi: 10.1177/0022022105275961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rauste von Wright, M. (1989). Relations between coping strategies, metacognitive readiness, and self-image in adolescent. In M. A. Luszcz & T. Nettelbeck (Eds.), Psychological development: Perspectives across the life-span (pp. 311–318). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Rauste von Wright, M., Makkonen, T., & Markkanen, M. (1986). “Healthy” and “unhealthy” living habits among 15–16-year old Finnish adolescents. Publications of the National Board of Health. Series Original Reports 2/1986. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  42. Schimmack, U. (2007). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stutzer, A. (2003). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 89–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Torvi, K., & Kiljunen, P. (2005). Onnellisuuden vaikea yhtälö [The problematic equation of happiness]. Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy.Google Scholar
  45. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In F. Strack, M. Argyle & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 7–26). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1–46. doi: 10.1007/BF00300268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Westerhof, G., & Barret, A. (2005). Age identity and subjective well-being: A comparison of the United States and Germany. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60B, 129–137.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HUMAKUniversity of Applied SciencesKuopioFinland

Personalised recommendations