Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 563–582 | Cite as

Sub-national Fiscal Activity as a Determinant of Individual Happiness: Ideology Matters

  • Robert W. WassmerEmail author
  • Edward L. LascherJr.
  • Stephan Kroll
Research Paper

Abstract

Though there has been a recent outpouring of studies on the determinants of individual happiness, there remains a paucity of research on the influence of specific sub-national government policies. Additionally, theoretical expectations about how fiscal variables influence happiness are unclear, making further empirical research imperative. Combining survey data and aggregate information about state and local government revenue and expenditures within the United States, we draw inferences about whether or not such activities affect individual happiness. We find no indication that the overall level of state or local fiscal activity affects life satisfaction. However, we offer evidence that personal happiness could be increased with an increase in the percentage of sub-national expenditure devoted to public safety. We also find that there are notable differences across ideological groups (conservatives, moderates, and liberals) with respect to how much public safety influences happiness, as well as how some other fiscal variables influence happiness. We conclude that ideology mediates the impact of fiscal variables on life satisfaction.

Keywords

Happiness GSS Fiscal variables Ideology Sub-national government policies 

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2006). Exploring the bases of partisanship in the American electorate: Social identity vs. ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Centre on Quality of Life (2008). What makes us happy? The Australian Unity Well-Being Index. Retrieved on May 30, 2008, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/Survey_18.2.pdf.
  5. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2007). The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, 130, 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, A. (2007). Born to be mild? Cohort effects don’t (fully) explain why well-being is U-shaped in age. IZA Discussion Paper 3170.Google Scholar
  7. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2005). Partisan social happiness. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91, 335–341.Google Scholar
  11. Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2008). Direct democracy and life satisfaction revisited: New evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (2006). Public opinion in the states: A quarter century of change and stability. In J. Cohen (Ed.), Public opinion in the states. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, R. C. (2007). State and local public finance (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  17. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gruber, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1), Article 4.Google Scholar
  22. Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? Economic Journal, 116, C34–C45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keith, B. E., Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J., Orr, E., Westlye, M. C., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Konow, J., & Earley, J. (2008). The hedonistic paradox: Is homo economicus happier? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ovaska, T., & Takashima, R. (2006). Economic policy and the level of self-perceived well-being: An international comparison. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pacek, A., & Radcliff, B. (2008). Assessing the welfare state: The politics of happiness. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets, and life satisfaction: The political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review, 95, 939–952.Google Scholar
  30. Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). The pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Well-being in the welfare state: Level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2, 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Wassmer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Edward L. LascherJr.
    • 1
  • Stephan Kroll
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Public Policy and AdministrationCalifornia State University, SacramentoSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations