Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 523–539 | Cite as

Market Openness, Transition Economies and Subjective Wellbeing

  • Ming-Chang TsaiEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

This study attempts to examine the impact on subjective wellbeing (SWB) of economic openness as a social institution. The empirical testing of the liberal argument for the importance of market openness in human wellness is based on a cross-national design. Average scores of ‘feeling of happiness’ in 65 countries and ‘life satisfaction’ in 76 countries measured during the 1990s that are drawn from the World Database of Happiness overseen by Veenhoven (2006) are modeled as dependent variables. Regression analysis generates favorable results for the liberal argument in that length of being an open economy (versus closed economy) boosts the level of happiness, while transition to openness augments life satisfaction. Although the post communist countries registered less happiness in the early phase of transition towards the market economy, in general, our model specification indicates that an open market in itself was not responsible for this region’s unpleasant psychology.

Keywords

Market economy Price stabilization Wellbeing 

References

  1. Aldcroft, D. H. (2001). The European Economy, 1914–2000 (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. (1990). Change scores as dependent variable in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthaud-Day, M. L., & Near, J. P. (2005). The wealth of nations and the happiness of nations: Why ‘accounting’ matters. Social Indicators Research, 74, 511–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (1982). Economics: Principles and policy (2nd ed.). Brace Jovanovich, New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  5. Berglund, S., Aarebrot, F. H., Vogt, H., & Karasimeonov, G. (2001). Challenges to democracy: Eastern Europe ten years after the collapse of communism. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008). Cross-country determinants of life satisfaction: Exploring different determinants across groups in society. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 119–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C., Gupta, N. D., & Pedersen, R. J. (2007). Analyzing trends in subjective wellbeing in 15 European countries, 1973–2002. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective wellbeing across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 185–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G., & Sousa-Posa, A. (2007). Is it culture or democracy? The impact of democracy, income, and culture on happiness. Social Indicators Research, 82, 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Easterlin, R. (2005). Diminishing marginal utility of income? Caveat emptor. Social Indicators Research, 70, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eckersley, R. (2000). The mixed blessing of material progress: Diminishing returns in the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money Does Matter! Evidence from Increasing Real Income and Life Satisfaction in East Germany Following Reunification. American Economic Review, 94, 730–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gough, I., McGregor, A., & Camfield, L. (2007). Theorising Wellbeing in International Development. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 3–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited—Growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayek, F. A. (1944[1991]). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hayek, F. A. (1991). Economic freedom. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Hayo, B. (2007). Happiness in transition: An empirical study of Eastern Europe. Economic Systems, 31, 204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayo, B., & Seifert, W. (2003). Subjective economic wellbeing in Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 165–183). Cambridge, MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R., & Siemienska, R. (1988). Changing values and political satisfaction in Poland and the west: A comparative analysis. Government and Opposition, 23, 440–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. International Monetary Fund. (2002). Government Finance Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC, various years. Google Scholar
  26. Johnston, J., & DiNardo, J. (1997). Econometric methods (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Kukathas, C. (1989). Hayek and Modern Liberalism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  28. Lane, R. (2000a). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lane, R. (2000b). Diminishing returns of income, companionship and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2006). Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2004. College Park, Maryland: Center for International Development and Conflict Management at the University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  31. Nee, V. (2005). The new institutionalism in economics and sociology. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 49–74). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ott, J. (2005). Level and inequality of happiness in nations: Does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ovaska, T., & Takashima, R. (2006). Economic policy and the level of self-perceived wellbeing: An international comparison. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peirό, A. (2006). Happiness, satisfaction and socio-economic conditions: Some international evidence. Journal of Socio-economics, 35, 348–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perlman, M. (1997). Hayek, the purpose of the market and American institutionalism. In S. F. Frowen (Ed.), Hayek: Economist and social philosopher (pp. 221–235). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets, and life satisfaction: The political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review, 95, 939–952.Google Scholar
  37. Sanfey, P., & Teksoz, U. (2005). Does transition make you happy? Working Paper No. 91, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz, S. H., & Melech, G. (2000). National differences in micro and macro worry: Social, economic, and cultural explanation. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 219–256). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Smart, B. (2003). Economy, culture and society: A sociological critique of neo-liberalism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Szelényi, I., & Kostello, E. (1996). The market transition debate: Toward a synthesis? American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1082–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsai, M. C. (2008). Instability’s impact on subjective wellbeing: A cross-national study. In V. Møller & D. Huschka (Eds.), Quality of life in the new millennium (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  42. Veenhoven, R. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34, 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in forty-four nations in the early 1990s. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 257–289). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Veenhoven, R. (2005). Apparent quality-of-life in nations: How long and happy people live. Social Indicators Research, 71, 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Veenhoven, R. (2006). World Database of Happiness. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl. Accessed 19 November 2006.
  46. Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K. H. (2003). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 10152, December 2003.Google Scholar
  47. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test of heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolfers, J. (2003). Is business cycle volatility costly? Evidence from surveys of subjective wellbeing. International Finance, 6, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. World Bank. (2004). World Development Indicators CD-Rom. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNational Taipei UniversitySan SiaTaiwan

Personalised recommendations