Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 293–311 | Cite as

Stability of Typical Patterns of Subjective Well-Being in Middle-Aged Swedish Women

Research Paper

Abstract

Typical patterns of general subjective well-being (SWB) were searched for in a representative longitudinal sample of Swedish women (N = 272) at age 43 and 49. Cluster analysis at each age separately resulted in a six-cluster solution at both ages. The two solutions were similar, indicating structural stability across 6 years. Five of the six clusters also showed significant individual stability. Among these clusters, a generalized positive typical pattern and two generalized negative typical patterns were found, one characterized by very high negative affect and one characterized by very low global life satisfaction. A cluster characterized by above average positive and negative affect was also found as well as one characterized by low positive affect. A strong relationship was found between membership in an extreme cluster and the values in certain SWB-related variables, supporting the validity of the typical patterns found. Further, it was shown that cluster membership contributed to the prediction of some validation variables above the prediction achieved by using only SWB components entered as continuous variables, suggesting the presence of interactions and nonlinearities in the SWB area.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Cluster analysis Typical patterns Person-oriented 

References

  1. Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. In J. P. Forgas & J. M. Innes (Eds.), Resent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 189–203). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies. New York, NY: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Bergman, L. R. (1988). You can’t classify all of the people all of the time. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman, L. R. (1998). A pattern-oriented approach to studying individual development: Snapshots and processes. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 83–121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bergman, L. R. (2000). Women’s health, work, and education in a life-span perspective. Technical Report 1. Reports for the project Individual Development and Adaptation, No. 70, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  6. Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Paths through life (Vol. 4). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  10. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–305). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement. New York, NY: World Book.Google Scholar
  13. Chamberlain, K. (1988). On the structure of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 20, 581–604.Google Scholar
  14. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daukantaite, D., & Bergman, L. R. (2003). Components of subjective well-being in Swedish women. Reports from the Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, No. 83.Google Scholar
  16. Daukantaite, D., & Bergman, L. R. (2005). Childhood roots of women’s subjective well-being: The role of optimism. European Psychologist, 10, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidson, R. J. (2004). Well-being and affective style: neural substrates and biobehavioral correlates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 359, 1395–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–230). New York: Russell–Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. (1997). Resent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
  25. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eggleston, E., Wong, E. L., Hardee, K., Irwanto, Poerwandari, E. K., & Severy, L. J. (2001). Measuring women’s psychological well-being in Indonesia. Women & Health, 32(4), 17–32.Google Scholar
  27. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamp Dush, C. M., & Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klinteberg af, B., Schalling, D., & Magnusson, D. (1986). Self-report assessment of personality traits. Data from the KSP inventory on a representative sample of normal male and female subjects within a developmental project. Reports from the Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, No. 64.Google Scholar
  30. Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Kaprio, J, Honkanen, R. J., Viinamäki, H., & Koskenvuo, M. (2005). The stability of life-satisfaction in a 15-year follow-up of adult Finns, healthy at baseline. BMC Psychiatry, 5, 4.Google Scholar
  31. Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (Eds.) (2006). Person- and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 377–644.Google Scholar
  32. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  33. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (1999). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lundberg, U., Mårdberg, B., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1994). The total workload of male and female white-collar workers as related to age, occupational level, and number of children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 35, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lövdén, M., Bergman, L. R., Adolfsson, R., Lindenberger, U., & Nilsson, L. G. (2005). Studying individual aging in an interindividual context: Typical paths of age-related, dementia-related, and mortality-related cognitive development in old age. Psychology and aging, 20(2), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magnusson, D. (1985). Implications of an interactional paradigm for research on human development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8, 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective. A longitudinal study. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Paths through life (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person approach. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–63). New York, NY: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Magnusson, D. (2001). The holistic–interactionistic paradigm: Some directions for empirical developmental research. European Psychologist, 6, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Magnus, K., Diener, E., Fujita, F., & Pavot, W. (1993). Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of objective life-events: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1046–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mastekaasa, A. (1994). Psychological well-being and marital dissolution. Journal of Family Issues, 15(2), 208–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meehl, P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olah, A. (2002). Positive traits: Flow and psychological immunity. In Paper presented at the First International Positive Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  45. Schalling, D., Asberg, M., Edman, G., & Oreland, L. (1987). Markers for vulnerability to psychopathology: temperament traits associated with platelet MAO activity. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 76, 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait-anxiety, self-mastory, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgemental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell–Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Correlates of happiness: 7,836 findings from 603 studies in 69 nations: 1911–1994. Unpublished manuscript, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  50. Vittersø, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 903–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  54. White, J. M. (1992). Marital status and well-being in Canada. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Whelan, M. (1989). Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An ideographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations