Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 257–269 | Cite as

The Role of Ideal Affect in the Experience and Memory of Emotions

  • Christie Napa Scollon
  • Amanda Hiles Howard
  • Amanda E. Caldwell
  • Sachiyo Ito
Research Paper

Abstract

According to Affect Valuation Theory (Tsai et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1031–1039), culture influences how people want to feel (ideal affect). Integrating Affect Valuation Theory with the Time-sequential Framework of Subjective Well-being (Kim-Prieto et al. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300), we proposed that cultural norms influence the memory, but not the experience, of emotion. The present study examined the role of ideal affect in relation to experience sampling and retrospective reports of emotion. Ideal affect correlated with retrospective reports but not experience sampling reports. Extraversion and neuroticism were more strongly related to experience sampling reports than to ideal levels of emotion. Results suggest that retrospective reports of emotion involve a dynamic process that incorporates cultural information into the reconstruction whereas on-line emotions are more constrained by temperament.

Keywords

Affect Emotion Norms Experience sampling Subjective well-being 

References

  1. Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., Pavot, W. G., & Allman, A. (1991). The psychic costs of intense positive affect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61, 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diener, E., Scollon, C. K., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of a hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). NewYork: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter- and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feldman Barrett, L. (1997). The relationships among momentary emotion experiences, personality descriptions, and retrospective ratings of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1100–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman Barrett, L., & Barrett, D. (2005). The experience sampling program: Version 4.0.Google Scholar
  7. Fivush, R. (1994). Constructing the self in parent-child conversations. In U. Neisser, & R. Fivush (Eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative (pp. 136–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Vol. 7 (pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C. N., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim-Prieto, C., Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2004). Culture and patterns of emotional experience. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  11. Lyubomirsky, S., & Tucker, K. L. (1998). Implications of individual differences in subjective happiness for perceiving, interpreting, and thinking about life events. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 155–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oishi, S. (2002). Experiencing and remembering of well-being: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1398–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oishi, S., & Sullivan, H. W. (2006). The predictive value of daily vs. retrospective well-being judgments in relationship stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 460–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Shields, S. A. (1998). The gender heuristic and the database: Factors affecting the perception of gender-related differences in the experience and display of emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scollon, C. N., Caldwell, A. E., Howard, A. H., & Birchfield, T. (2007). Will students take another fun class? It depends on how they remember it. Manuscript in progress.Google Scholar
  17. Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S, & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 304–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Testing for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N. L., & Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1031–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tsai, J. L., Miao, F. F., & Seppala, E. (2007). Good feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: Religious differences in ideal affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tsai, J. L., Miao, F. F., Seppala, E., Fung, H. H., & Yeung, D. Y. (2007). Influence and adjustment goals: Sources of cultural differences in ideal affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1102–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wirtz, D., Kruger, J., Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2003). What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choice. Psychological Science, 14, 520–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christie Napa Scollon
    • 1
  • Amanda Hiles Howard
    • 1
  • Amanda E. Caldwell
    • 1
  • Sachiyo Ito
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology Texas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations