Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 429–449 | Cite as

Subjective Wellbeing as an Affective-Cognitive Construct

  • Melanie T. Davern
  • Robert A. Cummins
  • Mark A. Stokes
Research Paper

Abstract

The affective content of Subjective Wellbeing (SWB) was investigated in two separate studies. Study 1 involved a representative sample of 478 participants from across Australia aged between 18 and 72 years. This study tested the circumplex model of affect and then determined the minimum set of affects that explain variance in SWB. The model was supported, with most affects congregated around the valence axis. Overall, 64% of the variance in SWB was explained by six Core Affects, indicating that SWB is a highly affective construct. Study 2 tested the relative strength of Core Affect (content, happy and excited), in three separate models of SWB incorporating cognition (seven discrepancies) and all five factors of personality. Using a sample of 854 participants aged been 18–86 years, structural equation modeling was used to compare an affective-cognitive driven model of SWB, with a personality driven model of SWB and a discrepancy driven model of SWB. The results provide support for an affective-cognitive model which explained 90 percent of the variance in SWB. All models confirm that the relationship between SWB, Core Affect and Discrepancies is far stronger than the relationship between personality and SWB. It is proposed that Core Affect and Discrepancies comprise the essence of SWB. Moreover, Core Affect is the driving force behind individual set-point levels in SWB homeostasis.

Keywords

Subjective wellbeing Core affect Life satisfaction Homeostasis Personality 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank Ann-Marie James for her assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  3. Bradburn, N. M., & Caplovitz, D. (1965). Reports on happiness: a pilot study. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  4. Browne, M. W. (1992). Circumplex models for correlational matrices. Psychometrika, 57(4), 469–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, S. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality, self-esteem, and demographic predictions of happiness and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 921–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clifford, P. R., Edmundson, E. W., Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G. (1991). Drug use and life satisfaction among college students. International Journal of the Addictions, 26, 45–53.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Personal income and subjective well-being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A. (2005). Caregivers as managers of subjective wellbeing: A homeostatic perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 18, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A model of subjective well-being homeostasis: The role of personality. In E. Gullone, R. A. Cummins, & A. L. D. Lau (Eds.), The universality of subjective well-being indicators. Social indicators research book series (vol. 2002, pp. 7–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2004). The motivation to maintain subjective well-being: A homeostatic model. In H. Switzky (Ed.), International review of research on mental retardation: Personality and motivational systems in mental retardation (Vol. 28, pp. 255–301). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummins, R. A., Okerstrom, E., Woerner, J., & Tomyn, A. (2005). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 13.0—“The wellbeing of Australians—caregiving at home”. from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm
  18. Davern, M. T., & Cummins, R. A. (2006). Is life dissatisfaction the opposite of life satisfaction? Australian Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeNeve, K. M. (1999). Happy as an extraverted clam? The role of personality for subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 8, 141–144.Google Scholar
  20. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective wellbeing. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being, the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fabrigar, L. R., Visser, P. S., & Browne, M. W. (1997). Conceptual and methodological issues in testing the circumplex structure of data in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 184–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feldman, L. A. (1995a). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feldman, L. A. (1995b). Variations in the circumplex structure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 806–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gurin, G., Veroff, J., & Feld, S. (1960). Americans view their mental health. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences (pp. 258–348). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hanestad, B. R., & Albrektsen, G. (1992). The stability of quality of life experience in people with Type 1 diabetes over a period of a year. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. J. (1989). Personality, life events and subjective well-being: Towards a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henry, W. P. (1997). The circumplex in psychotherapy research. In R. Plutchik & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 385–410). Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Happiness, introversion-extraversion and happy introverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Huelsman, T. J., Nemanick, R. C., & Munz, D. C. (1998). Scales to measure four dimensions of dispositional mood: Positive energy, tiredness, negative activation, and relaxation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(5), 804–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. International Wellbeing Group (2006). Personal wellbeing index (4th edn.). Retrieved, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm
  37. Kashdan, T. B. (2004). The assessment of subjective well-being (issues raised by the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire). Personality and Individual Differences, 36(5), 1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kozma. (1996). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to an understanding of subjective well-being. Paper presented at the World Conference on Quality of Life, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, (August 22–25).Google Scholar
  40. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  41. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Man, P. (1991). The influences of peers and parents on youth life satisfaction in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 24, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nemanick, R. C. J., & Munz, D. C. (1997). Extraversion and neuroticis, trait mood, and state affect: A hierarchical relationship? Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 12(4), 1079–1092.Google Scholar
  45. Neugarten, B. L., Havinghurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.Google Scholar
  46. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Foss, M. A. (1987). The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science, 11(3), 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research multivariate. Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Russell, J. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell, J. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.Google Scholar
  51. Russell, J., & Carroll, J. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell, J., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schlosberg, H. (1952). The description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schlosberg, H. (1954). Three dimensions of emotion. Psychological Review, 61, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suh, E., & Diener, E. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 70, 1091–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics, (4th edn.). MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  57. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Social Indicators Research, 32, 101–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vitterso, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 903–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vitterso, J., & Nilsen, F. (2002). The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism, and extraversion: Once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 57, 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierarchical arrangement of the negative affects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1938). Experimental psychology, (3rd edn.). London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie T. Davern
    • 1
  • Robert A. Cummins
    • 2
  • Mark A. Stokes
    • 2
  1. 1.VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health & Social WellbeingUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations