Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 457–466 | Cite as

Core Affect and Subjective Wellbeing: A Rebuttal to Moum and Land

  • Robert A. CumminsEmail author
  • Mark A. Stokes
  • Melanie T. Davern
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper is a rebuttal to the reviews of Moum and Land. Publication has been facilitated by Journal policy (see Instructions to authors ‘Procedure when the authors and reviewers disagree’ on the Journal website) which details the procedure to be followed in the case of disputed manuscripts. Our reply is in two parts. The first concerns issues of theory and the second issues of methodology. Each point of critique raised by the reviewers has been answered and shown either to be false or irrelevant. We contend that our original conclusion still stands. Subjective wellbeing is dominated by Core Affect.

Keywords

Core affect Life satisfaction Happiness Rebuttal Subjective wellbeing Set-point 

References

  1. Bradley, J. V. (1980). Nonrobustness in one-sample Z and t-tests: A large-scale sampling study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15(1), 29–32.Google Scholar
  2. Casas, F., Coenders, G., Cummins, R. A., Gonzàlez, M., Figuer, C., & Malo, S. (2007). Does life satisfaction and satisfaction with life domains show any relationship between parents and children? Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9044-7.
  3. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, L. S., & Aiken, S. G. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3 ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. J., & Zonderman, A. B. (1987). Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being: Longitudinal follow-up of an American national sample. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 299–306.Google Scholar
  5. Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H. M., Hale, J. M. S., & Reb, J. (2003). The structure of affect: Reconsidering the relationship between negative and positive affectivity. Journal of Management, 29(6), 831–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. A. (2002). The validity and utility of subjective wellbeing: A reply to Hatton and Ager. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A model of subjective well being homeostasis: The role of personality. In E. Gullone & R. A. Cummins (Eds.), The universality of subjective wellbeing indicators: Social Indicators Research Series (pp. 7–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. D. L., & Davern, M. (in press). Homeostatic mechanisms and the quality of life. In K. C. Land (Ed.), Handbook of social indicators and quality-of-life studies. Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Tomyn, A., Gibson, A., & Knapp, T. (2006). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 16.0—The wellbeing of Australians—Mortgage payments and home ownership. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University, ISBN 1 7415 6071 3.Google Scholar
  10. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, this issue, doi: 10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1
  12. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective wellbeing. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being, the foundations of Hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman, L. A. (1995). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanestad, B. R., & Albrektsen, G. (1992). The stability of quality of life experience in people with Type 1 diabetes over a period of a year. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Headey, B. (2006). Subjective well-being: Revisions to dynamic equilibrium theory using national panel data and panel regression methods. Social Indicators Research, 79, 369–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. J. (1989). Personality, life events and subjective well-being: Towards a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell, D. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed.). Belmont CA, USA: Thompson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  20. Huelsman, T. J., Furr, R. M., & Nemanick, R. C. (2003). Measurement of dispositional affect: Construct validity and convergence with a circumplex model of affect. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huelsman, T. J., Nemanick, R. C., & Munz, D. C. (1998). Scales to measure four dimensions of dispositional mood: Positive energy, tiredness, negative activation, and relaxation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 804–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kozma, A., Stone, S., & Stones, M. J. (2000). Stability in components and predictors of subjective well-being (SWB): Implications for SWB structure. In E. Diener & D. R. Rahtz (Eds.), Advances in quality of life: Theory and research (pp. 13–30). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness in a stockastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004). Two Replicable suppressor situations in personality research multivariate. Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Predhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. London, UK: Wadsworth, Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
  28. Rafaeli, E., & Revelle, W. (2006). A premature consensus: Are happiness and sadness truly opposite affects? Motivation and Emotion, 30(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roysamb, E., Tambs, K., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Neale, M. C., & Harris, J. R. (2003). Happiness and health: Environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suh, E., & Diener, E. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1091–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tabachnik, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MD: Allyn & Bacon, Pearson International.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  34. Yik, M. S. M., & Russell, J. A. (2003). Chinese affect circumplex: I. Structure of recalled momentary affect. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Cummins
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark A. Stokes
    • 1
  • Melanie T. Davern
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  2. 2.VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health & Social WellbeingUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations