Spirituality and Subjective Well-Being: Evidences for a New Domain in the Personal Well-Being Index

  • Eduardo WillsEmail author
Research Paper


Subjective well-being explores the evaluations, both positive and negative, of how people experience their lives. Research in the field inquires how people perceive their well-being in different settings, including different cultures, regions and cities. A large number of different measures have been designed to capture subjective well-being. One of the most used SWB measure is the Personal Well-being Index (PWI), an evaluation of life developed by Cummins et al [(2003). Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190] which proposes that satisfaction with life consists of seven different life-domains. Theoretical considerations of the contribution of spirituality and religiosity to life satisfaction, from a eudaimonic (from the Greek, it consists of the word "eu" (good or well-being) and the word “daemon” (spirit)) point of view, led to test the contribution of this new domain in the prediction of the Personal Well-being Index (PWI) in Bogotá, Colombia. Empirical results confirm the construct validity and reliability of the scale. The contribution of the new domain—satisfaction with spirituality and religiosity—to PWI was found significant. Based on these results the paper explores conceptually the role of spirituality contributing to satisfaction with life. The finding stresses the importance of interpreting satisfaction with life as a whole from the Aristotelian concept of eudaimonia. New questions for research in this important area are proposed


Subjective well-being Personal well-being index Spirituality Eudaimonia 


  1. Adler, M. J. (1978). Aristotle for everybody. Mcmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 646–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Bulman, J. R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Casas, F. (2002). Personal Wellbeing Index. Translation to Spanish. International Wellbeing Group. Scholar
  7. Clark, A. E., & Lelkes, O. (2005). Deliver us from Evil: Religion as Insurance. PSE Working Papers, 43, PSE, Ecole normale supérieure.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A.J. (2002). A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1139–1144.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, A. B. (2002). The importance of spirituality in well-being for Jews and Christians. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A. (1996a). Assessing quality of life. In R.I. Brown (eds.), Quality of life for handicapped people. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A. (1996b). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, R. A. (2000a). Personal income and subjective wellbeing: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. A. (2000b). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J, & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Lo, S. K., Davern, M., Hunter, B. & Okerstrom, E. (2004). The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: An Overview. Social Indicators Network News, 76, 1–4.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, R.A. (2006). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 14.1 – Fifth Anniversary Special Report – Summarizing the major findings. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E. (2000), Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E.P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the economic lot? Some empirical evidence In P. David, & W.R Melvin (eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. California: Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176–11183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eckersley, R. (2000). The mixed blessings of material progress: Diminishing returns in the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(3), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emmons, R. A. & Paloutzian, R. F. (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Erickson, E. (1982). The life cycle completed: A review. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2003). Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  31. Helliwell, J. F.: (2005). Wellbeing, social capital and public policy. What’s new? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No 11807.Google Scholar
  32. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transcriptions. Royal Society of London, 1435–1446.Google Scholar
  33. Kahneman, D., Diener, E. & Schwarz, N. (eds.) (1999). Wellbeing: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Kas, J. D., Friedman, R., Lescrman, J., Zuttermeister, P. C., & Benson, H. (1991). Health Outcomes and a new index of spiritual experience. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kenny, A. (1978). Aristotelian Ethics. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kim-Prieto, Ch., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, CH., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the Diverse Definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(3), 261–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuznets, S. (1930) Equilibrium economics and business cycle theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 45(1), 40–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kennedy, J. E. & Kanthamani, H. (1995). An explorative study of effects of paranormal and spiritual experiences on people’s lives and well-being. The Journal of American Society for Psychical Research, 89, 249–264.Google Scholar
  39. Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the personal wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness. Taurus.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis, Ch. A. & Cruise, S. H. M. (2005). ‘Religion and happiness: Consensus, contradictions, comments and concerns. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 9(3), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y. & Diener, E. (2003). Re-examining adaptation and the set-point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 537–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maslow, A. (1979). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  44. Mora, F. J. (1994). Diccionario de Filososfía. Ariel referencia.Google Scholar
  45. Nussbaum, M.C., Sen, A., (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Parducci, A. (1995),’ Happiness, pleasure and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. NJ, Erlbaum: Mahwah.Google Scholar
  47. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryff, C. D. (1989). ‘Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarason, S. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Saxena, Sh., O’Connell, K., & Underwood, L. (2002). A commentary: Cross-cultural quality of life assessment at the end of life. The Gerontologist, 42, 81–85.Google Scholar
  51. Sen, A. (2000). Capability and Wellbeing. In Sen A., Nussbaum M. (Eds.), The quality of life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  52. Sen, A. K., & Sudhir, A. (1997). Concepts of human development and poverty: A multidimensional perspective. Background Paper for Human Development Report, 1997.Google Scholar
  53. Sen, A. (1985) Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982.Google Scholar
  54. Sen, A. (1999) Development as freedom. New York.Google Scholar
  55. Smitsman, A. (2006). Correspondence to the International Well-Being Group.
  56. Tiberius, V. (2004). Cultural differences and philosophical accounts of well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R. A., & Davern, M. (2006). Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: The case of Algeria. Social Indicators Research, 75, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Dierendonck, D., & Mohan, K. (2006). Some thoughts on spirituality and eudaimonic well-being. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 9(3), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Veenhoven, R. (1991), Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In F. Strack, M. Argyle & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 7–26). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  60. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Correlates of happiness. Rotterdam, RISBO.Google Scholar
  61. Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Veenhoven, R. (2007). Subjective measures of wellbeing. In Mark McGillivray (Ed.), Human well-being: Concept and measurement (pp. 214–239). Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  64. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrast of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. WHOQOL-SRPB Group, A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion and personal beliefs as components of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1486–1497.Google Scholar
  66. World Happiness Data Base, Scholar
  67. World Health Organization, WHO (2002). The world health report: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversidad de los AndesBogotaColombia

Personalised recommendations