Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 467–515 | Cite as

Financial aspirations, financial success, and overall life satisfaction: who? and how?

  • Carol Nickerson
  • Norbert Schwarz
  • Ed Diener
  • The Gallup Organization
Article

Abstract

Nickerson et al. (2003, Psychological Science 14, pp. 531–536) demonstrated in a longitudinal study that the negative relation between aspirations for financial success and subjective well-being found by other researchers was mitigated by high household income. The present study first refined the analysis in Nickerson et al. (2003) and then explored two additional issues: (a) who aspires to financial success? and (b) how is financial success achieved? Analysis indicated that individuals with strong financial aspirations are socially inclined, confident, ambitious, politically conservative, traditional, conventional, and relatively less able academically, but not psychologically distressed. Financial success is achieved via the job and, for women only, via marriage. Financial aspirations influence job income both by influencing choice of occupation and by influencing job income within occupation; however, achieving financial success depends on having the personal resources to do so. Women with strong financial aspirations tend to marry for money (or money-making potential) regardless of their work status; men with strong financial aspirations do not.

Keywords

financial aspirations financial success goal achievement goals income life satisfaction mate preferences materialism moderators money subjective well-being values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuvia A.C., Wong N.Y. (2002). Personality and values based materialism: Their relationship and origins. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12:389–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G.W., P.E. Vernon and G. Lindzey: 1970, Study of Values: A Scale for Measuring the Dominant Interests in Personality (rev. 3rd ed.) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  4. Astin, A.W., M.R. King and G.T. Richardson: 1976, The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1976 (Cooperative Institutional Research Program of the American Council on Education and the University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education, Laboratory for Research in Higher Education, Los Angeles, CA)Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee B., McKeage K. (1994). How green is my value: Exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism. Advances in Consumer Research 21:147–152Google Scholar
  6. Becker G.S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen W.G., Bok D. (1998). The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Burroughs J.E., Rindfleisch A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 29:348–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss D.M. (1989a). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures’ [with commentaries and reply]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:1–49Google Scholar
  10. Buss D.M. (1989b). Toward an evolutionary psychology of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:39–46 [in Buss, 1989a]Google Scholar
  11. Buss D.M. (2003). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating (rev. ed.). BasicBooks, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. Buss D.M., Schmitt D.P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100:204–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan R., Joseph S. (2000). Dimensions of personality, domains of aspiration, and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences 28:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee A., Hunt J.M. (1996). Self-monitoring as a personality correlate of materialism: An investigation of related cognitive orientation. Psychological Reports 79:523–528Google Scholar
  15. Chatterjee A., Hunt J.M., Kernan J.B. (2000). Social character of materialism. Psychological Reports 86:1147–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christopher A.N., Schlenker B.R. (2004). Materialism and affect: The role of self-presentational concerns. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 23:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen P., Cohen J. (1996). Life Values and Adolescent Mental Health. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. Crawford, E., E. Diener, S. Oishi and D. Wirtz: 2000, ‹Desires as a standard explaining income satisfaction’, cited in E. Diener and R. Biswas-Diener, 2002, ’Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research’, Social Indicators Research 57, pp. 119–169Google Scholar
  19. Daymont T.N., Andrisani P.J. (1984). Job preferences, college major, and the gender gap in earnings. Journal of Human Resources 19:408–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener E. (2005). Income and happiness. American Psychological Society Observer 18(4):35Google Scholar
  21. Diener E., Biswas-Diener R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research 57:119–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener E., Oishi S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In Diener E., Suh E.M. (eds), Culture and Subjective Well-Being. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 185–218Google Scholar
  23. Diener E., Suh E.M., Lucas R.E., Smith H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 125:276–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eagly A.H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  25. Eagly A.H., Wood W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist 54:408–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Easterlin R.A. (1995). Preferences and prices in choice of career: The switch to business, 1972–87. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easterlin R.A. (2001). Life cycle welfare: Evidence and conjecture. Journal of Socio-Economics 30:31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Easterlin R.A., Crimmins E.M. (1991). Private materialism, personal self-fulfillment, family life, and public interest: The nature, effects, and causes of recent changes in the values of American youth. Public Opinion Quarterly 55:499–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elizur D., Sagie A. (1999). Facets of personal values: A structural analysis of life and work values. Applied Psychology: An International Review 48:73–87Google Scholar
  30. Eskilson A., Wiley M.G. (1999). Solving for the X: Aspirations and expectations of college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 28:51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feingold A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin 112:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Filer R.K. (1981). The influence of affective human capital on the wage equation. In Ehrenberg R.G. (eds), Research in Labor Economics vol. 4. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 367–409Google Scholar
  33. Filer R.K. (1983). Sexual differences in earnings: The role of individual personalities and tastes. Journal of Human Resources 18:82–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Filer R.K. (1986). The role of personality and tastes in determining occupational structure. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39:412–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fiorito J., Dauffenbach R.C. (1982). Market and nonmarket influences on curriculum choice by college students. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36:88–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedrich R.J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science 26:797–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fromm E. (1976). To Have or to Be. Harper & Row, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. Herzberg F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. World Publishing Company, Cleveland, OH, and New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. Hill R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics 37:554–558Google Scholar
  40. Holland J.L. (1973). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  41. Holland J.L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (2nd ed). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  42. Holland J.L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (3rd ed). Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FLGoogle Scholar
  43. Huang Y.-R., Healy C.C. (1997). The relations of Holland-typed majors to students’ freshman and senior work values. Research in Higher Education 38:455–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hudson J.W., Henze L.F. (1969). Campus values in mate selection: A replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family 31:772–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hunt J.M, Kernan J.B., Chatterjee A., Florsheim R.A. (1990). Locus of control as a personality correlate of materialism: An empirical note. Psychological Reports 67:1101–1102Google Scholar
  46. Huntley C.W., Davis F. (1983). Undergraduate study of value scores as predictors of occupation 25 years later. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:1148–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jaccard, J., R. Turrisi and C.K. Wan: 1990, Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–072 (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)Google Scholar
  48. Judd C.M., McClelland G.H. (1989). Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  49. Kasser T., Ryan R.M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:410–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kasser T., Ryan R.M. (1996). Further examining the American Dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22:280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kenrick D.T., Sadalla E.K., Groth G., Trost M.R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality 58:97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krueger, A.B.: 2002, ‹Economic scene: The apple falls close to the tree, even in the land of opportunity’, New York Times, 14 November, p. C4, URL http://www.irs.princeton.edu/krueger/11_14_2002.htmGoogle Scholar
  53. La Barbera P.A., Gürhan Z. (1997). The role of materialism, religiosity, and demographics in subjective well-being. Psychology & Marketing 14:71–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Langner T.S., Michael S.T. (1963). Life Stress and Mental Health: The Midtown Manhattan Study. Free Press of Glencoe [Macmillan], New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  55. Long J.E. (1995). The effects of tastes and motivation on individual income. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48:338–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGinnis R. (1958). Campus values in mate selection: A repeat study. Social Forces 35:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McHoskey J.W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion 23:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Menard, S.: 1991, Longitudinal Research, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-076 (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)Google Scholar
  59. Mick D.G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. Journal of Consumer Research 23:106–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nakosteen R.A., Zimmer M.A. (1997). Men, money, and marriage: Are high earners more prone than low earners to marry?. Social Science Quarterly 78:66–82Google Scholar
  61. Nickerson C., Schwarz N., Diener E., Kahneman D. (2003). Zeroing in on the dark side of the American dream: A closer look at the negative consequences of the goal for financial success. Psychological Science 14:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Perkins H.W. (1991). Religious commitment, yuppie values, and well-being in post-collegiate life. Review of Religious Research 32:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Polachek S.W. (1978). Sex differences in college major. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 31:498–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Powers E.A. (1971). Thirty years of research on ideal mate characteristics: What do we know?. International Journal of Sociology of the Family 1:207–215Google Scholar
  65. Richins M.L., Dawson S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research 19:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Richins M.L., Rudmin F.W. (1994). Materialism and economic psychology. Journal of Economic Psychology 15:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rindfleisch A., Burroughs J.E. (1999). Materialism and childhood satisfaction: A social structural analysis. Advances in Consumer Research 26:519–526Google Scholar
  68. Rindfleisch A., Burroughs J.E., Denton F. (1997). Family structure, materialism, and compulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 23:312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roberts B.W., Robins R.W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26:1284–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruggles P. (1990). Drawing the Line: Alternative Poverty Measures and Their Implication for Public Policy. The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  71. Saunders S., Munro D. (2000). The construction and validation of a consumer orientation questionnaire (SCOI) designed to measure Fromm’s (1955) “marketing character” in Australia. Social Behavior and Personality 28:219–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schroeder J.E., Dugal S.S. (1995). Psychological correlates of the materialism construct. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10:243–253Google Scholar
  73. Sharpe J.P., Ramanaiah N.V. (1999). Materialism and the five-factor model of personality. Psychological Reports 85:327–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Solberg E.G., Diener E., Robinson M.D. (2004). Why are materialists less satisfied?. In: Kasser T., Kanner A.D. (eds), Psychology and Consumer Culture: The Struggle for a Good Life in a Materialistic World. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sprecher S., Sullivan Q., Hatfield E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:1074–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Symons D. (1979). Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  77. Tang T.L.-P., Luna-Arocas R., Sutarso T., Tang D.S.-H. (2004). Does the love of money moderate and mediate the income-pay satisfaction relationship?. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19:111–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tatzel M. (2003). The art of buying: Coming to terms with money and materialism. Journal of Happiness Studies 4:405–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tom G., Schmidt T., Deuber M. (1995). The materialistic orientation of business students. College Student Journal 29:106–110Google Scholar
  80. Townsend J.M. (1989). Mate selection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology 10:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Townsend J.M., Levy G.D. (1990). Effects of potential partners’ physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior 19:149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Trivers R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B. (eds), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, IL, pp. 136–179Google Scholar
  83. Turner R.H. (1964). Some aspects of women’s ambition. American Journal of Sociology 70:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tzelgov J., Stern I. (1978). Relationships between variables in three variable linear regression and the concept of suppressor. Educational and Psychological Measurement 38:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1997, Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1997 (117th ed.) (Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  86. Wachtel P.L., Blatt S.J. (1990). Perceptions of economic needs and of anticipated future income. Journal of Economic Psychology 11:403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ward S., Wackman D. (1971). Family and media influences on adolescent consumer learning. American Behavioral Scientist 14:415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Warnath C.F., Fordyce H.R. (1961). Inventoried values of entering college freshmen. Personnel and Guidance Journal 40:277–281Google Scholar
  89. Wiederman M.W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology 14:331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wiederman M.W., Allgeier E.R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation?. Ethology and Sociobiology 13:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wong N.Y.C. (1997). Suppose you own the world and no one knows? Conspicuous consumption, materialism, and self. Advances in Consumer Research 24:197–203Google Scholar
  92. Wood W., Rhodes N., Whelan M. (1989). Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin 106:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wright N.D., Larsen V. (1993). Materialism and life satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior 6:158–165Google Scholar
  94. Zohar A., Guttman R. (1989). Mate preference is not mate selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:38–39 [in Buss, 1989a]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Nickerson
    • 1
  • Norbert Schwarz
    • 2
  • Ed Diener
    • 3
  • The Gallup Organization
  1. 1.ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganInstitute of Social ResearchAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations