Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 251–287 | Cite as

Life-Satisfaction in Post-Soviet Russia and Ukraine

  • Pamela AbbottEmail author
  • Roger Sapsford
Article

Abstract

This paper fills a gap in the literature by looking at influences on the well-being of the citizens of Russia and Ukraine in the context of the triple shock – economic, political and social – that they experienced after 1991. The paper argues that lived experience – how people evaluate their living conditions – is as significant an influence on the welfare of citizens as are the actual conditions in which they live. The majority of the populations perceive the post-1991 economic and political changes negatively, and levels of general satisfaction and happiness are comparatively low. The findings suggest that objective economic factors, geographical/social location, health status and social context influence well-being, but also personal control and satisfaction with material circumstances, with health having a greater influence on happiness, while material circumstances and the evaluation of them have a greater influence on general satisfaction. The paper concludes by arguing for a model of reciprocal causation in which material factors provide the partially determining context for actions and are themselves influenced by happiness and satisfaction.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Personal Control Psychosocial Health Personal Support General Satisfaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, P. and C. Wallace: 2004, Explaining economic and social transition in post-Soviet Russia, Ukraine and Russia: the Social Quality approach. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Sociological Association, York, AprilGoogle Scholar
  2. Alber, J. and U. Kohler: 2004, Health and Care in an Enlarged Europe. Dublin, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, J.: 1997, ‘Surveying attitudes in Russia: A representation of formlessness’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies pp. 107–127Google Scholar
  4. Allart, E. 1993Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of Welfare ResearchNussbaum, M.Sen, A.K. eds. The Quality of LifeClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreys, F.M., Withey, S.B. 1976Social Indicators of Well-BeingPlenum PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, W., M. Keizer, L.J.G. van der Maeson and D. Phillips: 2001, General Paper on behalf of the first plenary of the Network Indicators of Social Quality (European Foundation on Social Quality, Amsterdam)Google Scholar
  7. Brunstein, J.C. 1993‘Personal goals and subjective well-being: a longitudinal study’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology6510611070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burawoy, M. 1997‘The Soviet descent into capitalism’American Journal of Sociology214301444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burawoy, M., P. Krotov and T. Lytkina: (ND) Involution and Destitution: Russia’s Gendered Transition to Capitalism. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, A., Converse, D.E., Rogers, W.L. 1976The Quality of American LifeRussell Sage FoundationNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cockerham, W.C.: 1999, Health and Social Change in Russia and Eastern Europe (Routledge, London)Google Scholar
  12. Cornwell, J. 1986Hard-Earned Lives: Accounts of Health and Illness in East End LondonTavistockLondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Dasgupta, S.K. 2002Sense of well-being and perceived quality of life in CalcuttaDiener, E.D.Rahtz, D.R. eds. Advances in Quality of Life Theory and ResearchKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Delhey, J.: 2004, Life Satisfaction in an Enlarged Europe. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Diener, C. 1996‘Most people are happy’Psychological Science7181185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Fujita, F. 1995‘Resources, personal strivings and subjective well being: A nomothetic and ideographic approach’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68126135Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Horwitz, J., Emmons, R.A. 1985‘Happiness of the very wealthy’Social Indicators Research16263274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Suh, E. 1997‘Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators’Social Indicators Research40189216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R.E., Smith, H.L. 1999‘Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress’Psychological Bulletin125276302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donovan, N., Halpern, D. 2002Life Satisfaction: The State of Knowledge and Implications for GovernmentStrategy UnitLondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Durkheim, E. 1952Suicide: A Study in SociologyRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Fehey, T., Smyth, E. 2004‘Do subjective indicators measure welfare?’European Societies6527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freedman, J. and P. Shaver: 1975, ‘What makes you happy questionnaire’, Psychology Today, 70Google Scholar
  24. Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A. 2002‘What can economists learn from happiness research?’Journal of Economic Literature40402435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glatzer, W. 1991Quality of life in advanced industrial countries: the case of West GermanyStrack, F.Argyle, M.Schwarz, N. eds. Subjective Well-BeingPergamonOxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Grazin, K.L., Haggerd, L.M. 2000An integrative explanation for quality of life: development and test of a structural modelDiener, E.D.Rahtz, D.R. eds. Advances in Quality of Life Theory and ResearchKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  27. Kozma, A., Stones, M.J. 1983‘Predictors of happiness’Journal of Gerontology38626628Google Scholar
  28. Kozma, E.S., Stone, S., Stones, M.J. 2002Stability in components and predictors of subjective well-being: Implications for SWB structureDiener, E.D.Rahtz, D.R. eds. Advances in Quality of Life Theory and ResearchKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. Larson, K.J., Diener, E., Emmons, R.A. 1985‘An evaluation of subjective well-being measures’Social Indicators Research17118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewinsohn, M., Redner, J.E., Seeley, J.R. 1991The relationship between life satisfaction and psychosocial variables: New perspectivesStrack, F.Argyle, M.Schwarz, N. eds. Subjective Well-BeingPergamonOxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. McFarland, C., Miller, R.J. 1994‘The framing of relative performance feedback: Seeing the glass half empty or half full’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology6610611073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Orlova, N., Ronnes, P. 1999‘The crippling cost of an incomplete transformation: The case of Ukraine’Post-Communist Economies11373397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oswald, A.J. 1997‘Happiness and economic performance’Economic Journal10718151831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pomerleau, J., M. McKee, R. Rose, D. Balabanova and A. Gilmore: 2002 ‘Comparative Health Report: Health Conditions and Health Behaviours’, in C. Haerpfer (ed.), Living Conditions, Lifestyles and Health: Periodic Progress Report No 2, Nov 2001–Oct 2002. Institute for Advanced Studies, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  35. Popay, J., Thomas, C., Williams, G., Gattrell, A., Bostock, L. 2003‘A proper place to live: Health inequalities, agency and the normative dimensions of space’Social Science and Medicine575569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Redmond, G.: 2002, Social Monitor: the MONEE Project, CEE/CIS/Baltics. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  37. Rose, R.: 1995, ‘Russia as an Hour-Glass society’, East European Constitutional Review 4, pp. 34–42Google Scholar
  38. Rose, R.: 2003, Health, Money and Well-Being: Subjective Responses to Post-soviet Transformations. Paper presented at the European Science Foundation, Paris, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  39. Saris, W. 2001‘What influences subjective well-being in Russia?’Journal of Happiness Studies2137146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schutz, W.: 2000, Explaining Quality of Life: The Controversy between Objective and Subjective Variable. EU Reporting, Working Paper, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  41. Schyns, P. 2001‘Income and satisfaction in Russia’Journal of Happiness Studies2173204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sen, A.K. 1993Capability and Well-BeingNussbaum, M.Sen, A.K. eds. The Quality of LifeClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Siegrist, J. 2000‘Place, social exchange and health: Proposed sociological framework’Social Science and Medicine5112831293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sztompka, P. 2002‘Cultural Trauma: The other face of social change’European Journal of Social Theory3441465Google Scholar
  45. van der Maesen, L. and M. Keizer: 2002, From Theory to Practice. European Foundation on Social Quality, Working Paper of the European Network on Indicators for Social Quality, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  46. Veenhoven, R. 1984Conditions of HappinessReidelDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  47. Veenhoven, R. 1991Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spotsStrack, F.Argyle, M.Schwarz, N. eds. Subjective Well-BeingPergamonOxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Veenhoven, R. 2001‘Are the Russians as unhappy as they say they are?’Journal of Happiness Studies13346Google Scholar
  49. Veenhoven, R. 2002‘Why social policy needs subjective indicators’Social Indicators Research583346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. World Bank, 1991, Human Development Report 199. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. World Bank, 2003, Human Development Report 200. World Bank Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  52. Yanitsky, O.N. 2000‘Sustainability and risk: The case of Russia’Innovations13265277Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caledonian Centre for Equality and DiversityGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations