Advertisement

Do urban redevelopment incentives promote asset deterioration? A game-theoretic approach

  • Roni GolanEmail author
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The elapsed time between a government’s announcement of its intention to redevelop and the launch of the new construction may often be quite lengthy. This study uses a game-theoretic framework to examine the effect of the option to redevelop on the quality of the existing housing stock during this extended pre-redevelopment period. We show that the benefits that accompany future redevelopment may lead to accelerated deterioration in the pre-redevelopment period. Moreover, we identify circumstances under which there exists a unique perfect Nash equilibrium where, in order to discourage objections by other homeowners, those who support redevelopment intentionally promote structural deterioration during the pre-redevelopment period. Our results highlight the need to shorten the period of time between the announcement of the option to redevelop and its implementation.

Keywords

Redevelopment Housing maintenance Neighborhood effect Incentives Game theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Danny Ben-Shahar, Elad Kravi, Yuval Arbel, Ji Won Lee, the anonymous referees and participants of the 2019 Israel Regional Science meeting and the 59th ERSA Congress for helpful comments. I thank the Alrov Institute for Real Estate Research for the financial support.

References

  1. Adair, A., Berry, J., Hutchison, N., & McGreal, S. (2007). Attracting institutional investment into regeneration: Necessary conditions for effective funding. Journal of Property Research,24(3), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albon, R. P., & Stafford, D. C. (1990). Rent control and housing maintenance. Urban Studies,27(2), 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alterman, R. (1995). A comparative view of neighborhood regeneration programs in nine countries: Are the lessons transferable? Urban Affairs Quarterly,30(5), 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amirtahmasebi, R., Orloff, M., Wahba, S., & Altman, A. (2016). Regenerating urban land: A practitioner’s guide to leveraging private investment. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, M. (1964). The federal bulldozer: A critical analysis of urban renewal. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Arkcoll, K., Guilding, C., Lamminamki, D., McManus, L., & Warnken, J. (2013). Funding common property expenditure in multi-owned housing schemes. Property Management,31(4), 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrow, K. (1970). Criteria, institutions, and function in urban development decisions. In A. H. Pascal (Ed.), Thinking about cities. Belmont: Dickenson.Google Scholar
  8. Assefa, G., & Ambler, C. (2017). To demolish or not to demolish: Life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society,28, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. August, M. (2016). “It’s all about power and you have none”: The marginalization of tenant resistance to mixed-income social housing redevelopment in Toronto, Canada. Cities,57, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum-Snow, N. & Han, L. (2019). The microgeography of housing supply.‏ Working paper. Retrieved August 13, 2019 from https://irefim.escpeurope.eu/img/papers/9-housing_supply_2019_0525.pdf.
  11. Ben-Shahar, D. (2004). Productive signaling equilibria and over-maintenance: An application to real estate markets. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,28(2–3), 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyle, M., & Kiel, K. (2001). A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities. Journal of Real Estate Literature,9(2), 117–144.Google Scholar
  13. Cameron, G. C. (1980). The future of the British conurbations: Policies and prescriptions for change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Carmon, N. (1999). Three generations of urban renewal policies: Analysis and policy implications. Geoforum,30(2), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chan, E., & Lee, G. K. (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research,85(2), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chui, E. (2001). Doomed elderly people in a booming city: Urban redevelopment and housing problems of elderly people in Hong Kong. Housing, Theory and Society,18(3–4), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics,3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, O. A., & Whinston, A. B. (1961). The economics of urban renewal. Law and Contemporary Problems,26, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Sousa, C. A., Wu, C., & Westphal, L. M. (2009). Assessing the effect of publicly assisted brownfield redevelopment on surrounding property values. Economic Development Quarterly,23(2), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eckart, W. (1985). On the land assembly problem. Journal of Urban Economics,18(3), 364–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fassmann, H., & Hatz, G. (2006). Urban renewal in Vienna. In G. Enyedi & Z. Kovacs (Eds.), Social changes and social sustainability in historical urban centres: The case of Central Europe (pp. 218–236). Pécs: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Regional Studies.Google Scholar
  22. Fu, Y., McMillen, D. P., & Somerville, T. (2002). Land assembly: Measuring holdup.‏ CUER working paper, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  23. Fu, Y., Somerville, T., Gu, M., & Huang, T. (1999). Land use rights, government land supply, and the pattern of redevelopment in Shanghai. International Real Estate Review,2(1), 49–78.Google Scholar
  24. Gao, L. W., & Ho, D. C. (2016). Explaining the outcomes of multi-owned housing management: A collective action perspective. Habitat International,57, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geva, Y., & Rosen, G. (2018). The regeneration deal: Developers, homeowners and new competencies in the development process. Geoforum,96, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon, C. (2003). Blighting the way: Urban renewal, economic development, and the elusive definition of blight. Fordham Urban Law Journal,31, 305.Google Scholar
  27. Hamilton, S. W., & Schwann, G. M. (1995). Do high voltage electric transmission lines affect property value? Land Economics,71, 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hui, E. C., Wong, J. T., & Wan, J. K. (2008). A review of the effectiveness of urban renewal in Hong Kong. Property Management,26(1), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Israel Planning Administration. (2016). National outline plan 38: National plan for strengthening existing buildings against earthquakes; combined version (in Hebrew). Retrieved August 13, 2019 from https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/generalpage/tama_38/he/National_planning_institutions_tama38_2016.pdf.
  30. Kiefer, D. (1980). Housing deterioration, housing codes and rent control. Urban Studies,17(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuyucu, T., & Ünsal, Ö. (2010). “Urban transformation” as state-led property transfer: An analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies,47(7), 1479–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Margalit, T. (2014). Multi-spot zoning: A chain of public–private development ventures in Tel Aviv. Cities,37, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuirk, P. M. (2000). Power and policy networks in urban governance: Local government and property-led regeneration in Dublin. Urban Studies,37(4), 651–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohammadi, J., & Khayambashi, E. (2014). Urban renewal incentives and its impacts on Tehran City old fabrics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,4(4), 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moon, C. G., & Stotsky, J. G. (1993). The effect of rent control on housing quality change: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Political Economy,101(6), 1114–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mualam, N., Salinger, E., & Max, D. (2019). Increasing the urban mix through vertical allocations: Public floorspace in mixed use development. Cities,87, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Flaherty, B. (1994). Land assembly and urban renewal. Regional Science and Urban Economics,24(3), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olsen, E. O. (1988). What do economists know about the effect of rent control on housing maintenance? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,1(3), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Osborne, M. J., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pavlov, A., & Blazenko, G. W. (2005). The neighborhood effect of real estate maintenance. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,30(4), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pennington, M. (2000). Planning and the political market: Public choice and the politics of government failure. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  42. Priemus, H. (2004). Housing and new urban renewal: Current policies in the Netherlands. European Journal of Housing Policy,4(2), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reschovsky, J. D. (1992). An empirical investigation into homeowner demand for home upkeep and improvement. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,5(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosenthal, S. S. (2008). Old homes, externalities, and poor neighborhoods: A model of urban decline and renewal. Journal of Urban Economics,63(3), 816–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenthal, S. S. (2014). Are private markets and filtering a viable source of low-income housing? Estimates from a “repeat income” model. American Economic Review,104(2), 687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rydell, C. P., & Neels, K. (1982). Rent control, undermaintenance, and housing deterioration. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  47. Sager, T. (2011). Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010. Progress in Planning,76(4), 147–199.Google Scholar
  48. Shin, H. B. (2009). Residential redevelopment and the entrepreneurial local state: The implications of Beijing’s shifting emphasis on urban redevelopment policies. Urban Studies,46(13), 2815–2839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shin, H. B., & Kim, S. H. (2015). The developmental state, speculative urbanization and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul. Urban Studies,53(3), 540–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sing, T. F., & Lim, C. W. J. (2004). Value of collective effort: Redevelopment timing options of enbloc sale sites in Singapore. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal,10(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strange, W. C. (1995). Information, holdouts, and land assembly. Journal of Urban Economics,38(3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tallon, A. (2013). Urban regeneration in the UK (2nd ed., p. 2013). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Varian, H. R. (1994). Sequential contributions to public goods. Journal of Public Economics,53(2), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, S. W. H. (2011). The evolution of housing renewal in Shanghai, 1990–2010: A “socially conscious” entrepreneurial city? International Journal of Housing Policy,11(1), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webster, C. J., & Lai, L. W. C. (2003). Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Weiler, V., Harter, H., & Eicker, U. (2017). Life cycle assessment of buildings and city quarters comparing demolition and reconstruction with refurbishment. Energy and Buildings,134, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wong, S. K., Cheung, A. K. C., Yau, Y., Chau, K. W., & Ho, D. C. W. (2005). Distinguishing the decrepit from the old: Is building age a good proxy for building performance? In Y. K. Cheung & K. W. Chau (Eds.), Tall buildings: From engineering to sustainability (pp. 687–692). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yau, Y., Wing, K. C., Ho, D. C. W., & Wong, S. K. (2008). An empirical study on the positive externality of building refurbishment. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis,1(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yip, N. M., & Forrest, R. (2002). Property owning democracies? Home owner corporations in Hong Kong. Housing Studies,17(5), 703–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zakiah, S., & Khadijah, H. (2017). The En Bloc Sale mechanism as a method of strata scheme termination and urban renewal: A review. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment,210, 381–392.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alrov Institute for Real Estate Research, Coller School of ManagementTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations