Stigmatized properties and housing values: an exploratory study

  • David ChapmanEmail author
  • Marty Ludlum
  • Ramachandran Vijayan
  • Weichu Xu
  • Burle Steelman
  • Dan Range
  • Deependra Dehariya


The purpose of this research is to provide an understanding of the potential effects that stigmatized properties may have for potential house purchasers’ decision making, as well as how a purchasers’ willingness to pay might be impacted. The originality of this research emerges from the distinct lack of empirical evidence in the current literature base with only one such study having investigated this phenomena in the past. Most research that has investigated aspects of stigmatization, have focused on the analysis of transaction prices from a quantitative perspective, with limited scholarly attention paid towards the psychological factors that may effect a purchasers willingness to purchase a property, their willingness to pay for a stigmatized property, as well as understanding if real estate agents should fully disclose stigmatization to prospective buyers. The study employed a qualitative survey that was designed to answer these fundamental gaps in the literature base, through a sample of 410 individuals. The results demonstrated that while some ambivalence existed, there was general consensus that such properties would incur a reduction in price, and would impact upon the selling potential of the property, if such stigmas were fully disclosed.


Stigmatized properties Buyer behavior House prices Willingness to pay 



  1. Aalberts, B., & Hoyt, R. (2000). Appraisers and toxic mold: Legal and valuation issues. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 6(2), 203–215.Google Scholar
  2. Abelson, P., Joyeux, R., & Mahuteau, S. (2013). Modelling house prices across Sydney. Australian Economic Review, 46, 269–285. Scholar
  3. Anderson, S. T., & West, S. E. (2006). Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6), 773–789.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Ezra, M., & Perlin, A. (2005). A primer on selling haunted houses and other stigmatized property. Probate and Property, 19, 59–62.Google Scholar
  5. Boggess, L. N., Greenbaum, R. T., & Tita, G. E. (2013). Does crime drive housing sales? Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36(3), 299–318.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R. B., & Thurlow, T. H. (1996). Buyers beware: Statutes shield real estate brokers and sellers who do not disclose that properties are psychologically tainted. Oklahoma Law Review, 49, 625–648.Google Scholar
  7. Caudill, S., Affuso, E., & Yang, M. (2015). Registered sex offenders and house prices: An hedonic analysis. Urban Studies, 52, 2425–2440.Google Scholar
  8. Cavanaugh, S. (2002). Nice to know a house is haunted. Washington Post, Oct. 26, 1.Google Scholar
  9. Chapman, D., & Ludlum, M. (2014). Teaching stigmatized property: You don’t have a ghost of a chance. Journal of Business Cases and Applications, 11(1), 63–70.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, A. B., Pierce, J. D., Chambers, J., Meade, R., Gorvine, B. J., & Koenig, H. G. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, belief in the afterlife, death anxiety, and life satisfaction in young Catholics and Protestants. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 307–324.Google Scholar
  11. Cozzolino, P. J., Blackie, L. E. R., & Meyers, L. S. (2014). Self-related consequences of death fear and death denial. Death Studies, 38, 418–422.Google Scholar
  12. Dezutter, J., Luyckx, K., & Hutsebaut, D. (2009). “Are you afraid to die?” Religion and death attitudes in an adolescent sample. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37, 163–173.Google Scholar
  13. Epley, D. (2012). The Gulf oil spill and its impact on coastal property value using the before-and-after procedure. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 20(1), 121–137.Google Scholar
  14. Francois, R. (2002). Power lines, visual encumbrance and house values: A microspatial approach to impact measurement. Journal of Real Estate Research, 23(3), 275–302.Google Scholar
  15. Freybote, J., & Fruits, E. (2015). Perceived environmental risk, media, and residential sales prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 37(2), 217–244.Google Scholar
  16. Hoen, B., & Atkinson-Palombo, C. (2016). Wind turbines, amenities, and disamenities: A study of home value impacts in densely populated Massachusetts. Journal of Real Estate Research, 38(4), 473–504.Google Scholar
  17. Hoen, B., Wiser, R., Cappers, P., Thayer, M., & Sethi, G. (2011). Wind energy facilities and residential properties: The effect of proximity and view on sales prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 33(3), 279–316.Google Scholar
  18. Irwin, E. (2002). The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics, 78(4), 465–480.Google Scholar
  19. Kilpatrick, J., Throupe, R., Carruthers, J., & Krause, A. (2007). The impact of transit corridors on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Research, 29(3), 303–320.Google Scholar
  20. Komuves, F. L. (1997). For sale: Two-bedroom home with spacious kitchen, walk-in closet, and pervert next door. Seton Hall Law Review, 27, 668–707.Google Scholar
  21. La Roche, C., Waller, B., & Wentland, S. (2014). “Not in my backyard”: The effect of substance abuse treatment centers on property values. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 6(2), 63–92.Google Scholar
  22. Larsen, J., & Coleman, J. (2001). Psychologically impacted houses: Broker disclosure behavior and perceived market effects in an unregulated environment. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 4(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. Ludlum, M. P. (1989). The funeral industry and public relations: A call for action. The Director, 60(1), 18–19.Google Scholar
  24. McCord, J., McCord, M., McCluskey, W., Davis, P. T., McIlhatton, D., & Haran, M. (2014). Effect of public green space on residential property values in Belfast metropolitan area. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 19(2), 117–137.Google Scholar
  25. McElveen, M. A., Brown, B. E., & Gibbons, C. M. (2017). Natural gas pipelines and the value of nearby homes: A spatial analysis. Journal of Housing Research, 26(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  26. Mothorpe, C. C., & Wyman, D. M. (2017). The appraisal of residential water view properties. The Appraisal Journal, 85(2), 130–141.Google Scholar
  27. Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The value of foreclosed property. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(2), 193–214.Google Scholar
  28. Pope, J. C. (2008). Fear of crime and housing prices: Household reactions to sex offender registries. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(3), 601–614.Google Scholar
  29. Reed v. King, 145 Cal. App. 3d 261, 193 Cal. Rptr. 130 (1983).Google Scholar
  30. Rosenbloom, S. (2006). Some buyers regret not asking: Anyone die here? New York Times, April 30, 1.Google Scholar
  31. Seiler, M. (2014). Power lines and perceived home prices: Isolating elements of easement rights and noise pollution. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 6(2), 47–61.Google Scholar
  32. Simons, R., Levin, W., & Sementelli, A. (1997). The effect of underground storage tanks on residential property values in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Journal of Real Estate Research, 14(1), 29–42.Google Scholar
  33. Simons, R., & Saginor, J. (2006). A Meta-analysis of the effect of environmental contamination and positive amenities on residential real estate values. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(1), 71–104.Google Scholar
  34. Simons, R. A., Seo, Y., & Rosenfeld, P. (2015). Modeling the effects of refinery emissions on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Research, 37(3), 321–342.Google Scholar
  35. Thomas, J. (2002). Environmental contamination and industrial real estate prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 23(1), 179–200.Google Scholar
  36. Throupe, R., Simons, R., & Mao, X. (2013). A review of hydro “fracking” and its potential effects on real estate. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 21(2), 205–232.Google Scholar
  37. Tita, G. L., Petras, T. L., & Greenbaum, R. T. (2006). Crime and residential choice: A neighborhood level analysis of the impact of crime on housing prices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 299–317.Google Scholar
  38. Ukpevbo, P., & Egbenta, I. R. (2016). Buyers’ perceptions of the proximity of high-voltage overhead electricity transmission lines on residential land values in Auchi, Nigeria. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 24(1), 167–182.Google Scholar
  39. Wada, R., & Zahirovic-Herbert, V. (2013). Distribution of demand for school quality: Evidence from quantile regression. Journal of Housing Research, 22(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
  40. Wisinger, P. (2014). Chemical hazardous sites and residential prices: Determinants of impact. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 6(2), 3–21.Google Scholar
  41. Wyman, D. M., & Worzala, E. M. (2016). Dockin’ USA: A spatial hedonic valuation of waterfront property. Journal of Housing Research, 25(1), 65–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central OklahomaEdmondUSA
  2. 2.Oklahoma City Community CollegeOklahomaUSA
  3. 3.East Stroudsburg U. of PennsylvaniaStroudsburgUSA
  4. 4.Coventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations