Advertisement

A need for policy revision to reach the intended beneficiaries: a learning from middle-income group housing models in Kolkata, India

  • Amit KaurEmail author
  • Sumana Gupta
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

West Bengal Housing Board initiated two group housing models for catering to the increased demand of affordable housing amongst low-income and middle-income groups. A sole government venture and a joint venture under Public–Private Partnership (PPP). Hence assessing the satisfaction level of group housing residents “with cost” incurred is crucial in making policy decisions. The present study focuses on MIG owing to the challenging housing requirement of this group based on sociological and financial constraints. Selecting MIG group housings from Kolkata, India, satisfaction level was assessed at three discrete domains -“within premises”, “at neighbourhood” and “with cost” incurred and holistically by evaluating overall level of satisfaction “with location”. Measuring this phenomenon developing a Composite Satisfaction Index (CSI) as a weighted average is also intended in this paper. Primary survey was conducted using structured questionnaires and data were collected on a five-point Likert scale. Data being ordinal in nature a two step approach was adopted: initially through exploratory factor analysis contributing attributes were identified and later a Generalised Ordered Logit Model was fitted in STATA. Mean satisfaction scores were computed and validated with savings calculated as a difference of actual expenditure and recommended expenditure towards housing. Attribute “with cost” contributed significantly towards overall level of satisfaction “with location” in both the models. Higher income leading to high affordability, high satisfaction domain wise led to high satisfaction level and CSI for the PPP residents. Lower income leading to low affordability, moderate satisfaction domain wise led to moderate satisfaction level and CSI for the residents of government group housings. Computed CSI values complied with overall findings indicating the reliability of the index in similar contexts. Affordability variations hamper the successful outreach of implemented government policies to the intended beneficiaries hinting at a need for policy revision.

Keywords

Middle-income group Government group housing model Public–private partnership model Composite satisfaction index Partial proportional odds model 

Notes

References

  1. Abreu, M. N. S., Siqueira, A. L., & Caiaffa, W. T. (2009). Ordinal logistic regression in epidemiological studies. Revista de Saude Publica, 43(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addo, I. A. (2016). Assessing residential satisfaction among low income households in multi-habited dwellings in selected low income communities in Accra. Urban Studies, 53(4), 631–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adriaanse, C. C. M. (2007). Measuring residential satisfaction: A residential environmental satisfaction scale (RESS). Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 22(3), 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, H. S. (2008). Why do residents want to leave deprived neighbourhoods? The importance of residents’ subjective evaluations of their neighbourhood and its reputation. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 23, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aulia, D. N., & Ismail, A. M. (2013). Residential satisfaction of middle income population: Medan City. In Paper presented at the Asia Pacific international conference on environment-behaviour studies, London. Google Scholar
  6. Bekleyen, A., & Korkmaz, N. M. (2013). An evaluation of Akabe mass housing settlement in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 28, 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benihocker, E. D., Farrell, D., & Zainulbhai, A. D. (2007). Tracking the growth of India’s middle class. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 51–61.Google Scholar
  8. Chadchan, J., & Shankar, R. (2012). An Analysis of urban growth trends in the post-economic reform period in India. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 1, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandra, P. (2011). Projects planning, analysis, selection, financing, implementation, and review. Project management. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.Google Scholar
  10. Chapman, D. W., & Lombard, J. R. (2006). Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction in fee-based gated and nongated communities. Urban Affairs Review, 41(6), 41–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  12. Dekker, K., Vos, S. D., Musterd, S., & Kempen, R. V. (2011). Residential satisfaction in housing estates in European Cities: A multi-level research approach. Housing Studies, 26(4), 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Djebarni, R., & Al-Abed, A. (2000). Satisfaction level with neighbourhoods in low-income public housing in Yemen. Property Management, 18(4), 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekstrom, J. (2011). A generalized definition of the polychoric correlation. California: Department of Statistics, University of California.Google Scholar
  15. Eyduran, E., Topal, M., & Sonmez, A. Y. (2010). Use of factor scores in multiple regression analysis for estimation of body weight by several body measurements in brown trouts (Salmo trutta fario). International Journal of Agriculture Biology, 12, 611–615.Google Scholar
  16. Fernandez, R. M., & Kulik, J. C. (1981). A multilevel model of life satisfaction: Effects of individual characteristics and neighborhood composition. American Sociological Review, 46, 840–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  18. Ghasrodashti, R. E., Majedi, H., & Paydar, M. (2017). Assessment of residential satisfaction in Mehr housing scheme: A case study of Sadra New Town, Iran. Housing Theory and Society, 34(3), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guidelines for Affordable Housing in Partnership (Amended). (2011). Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation (MoHUPA).Google Scholar
  20. Hong, T. T. (2011). Determinants of Housing Satisfaction in Klang Valley, Malaysia. School of Business Occasional Paper Series No. 2 (pp. 1–34).Google Scholar
  21. Howley, P., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2009). Sustainability versus liveability: An investigation of neighbourhood Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(6), 847–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kannan, K. P., & Raveendran, G. (2011). India’s common people: The regional profile. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI(38), 60–73.Google Scholar
  23. Karuppannan, S., & Sivam, A. (2011). Social sustainability and neighbourhood design: an investigation of residents’satisfaction in Delhi. Local Environment the International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 16(9), 849–870.Google Scholar
  24. Lawhon, L. L. (2009). The neighborhood unit: Physical design or physical determinism? Journal of Planning History, 8(2), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, T. (1968). Urban neighbourhood as a socio-spatial schema. Human Relations, 21, 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu, X. (2016). Applied ordinal logistic regression using STATA: From single level to multilevel modelling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Lovejoy, K., Handy, S., & Mokhtarian, P. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milic, J., & Zhou, J. (2017). Residential satisfaction among young people in post-socialist countries: The case of Serbia. Journal of Housing and Built Environment.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-017-9579-9.Google Scholar
  29. Mohit, M. A., & Ali, M. S. (2016). Neighbourhood satisfaction and QOUL in Middle Income Housing in Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia. Journal of Malaysian Institute of Planners, 14, 81–94.Google Scholar
  30. Mohit, M. A., Ibrahim, M., & Rashid, Y. R. (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34(1), 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ochako, R., Fotso, J. C., Ikamari, L., & Khasakhala, A. (2011). Utilization of maternal health services among young women in Kenya: Insights from the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. BMC Pregnancy and Child Birth, 11(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peterson, B., & Harrell, F. E. (1990). Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), 39(2), 205–217.Google Scholar
  33. Quddus, M. A., Wang, C., & Ison, S. G. (2010). Road traffic congestion and crash severity: Econometric analysis using ordered response models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136(5), 424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ren, H., & Folmer, H. (2017). Determinants of residential satisfaction in Urban China. A multi-group structural equation analysis. Urban Studies, 54(6), 1407–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting, A handbook of researchers and practitioners (pp. 136–155). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Sakar, E., Keskin, S., & Unver, H. (2011). Using of factor analysis scores in multiple linear regression model for prediction of kernel weight in Ankara Walnuts. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21, 182–185.Google Scholar
  37. Sengupta, U. (2006). Government Intervention and public–private partnerships in housing delivery in Kolkata. Habitat International, 30(3), 448–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shields, M., & Wooden, M. (2003). Investigating the role of neighbourhood characteristics in determining life satisfaction. Melbourne Institute working paper no. 24/03.Google Scholar
  39. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59, 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steiner, H. M. (1992). Engineering economic principles (pp. 107–124). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Sulaiman, H., & Yahaya, N. (1987). Housing provision and satisfaction of low-income households in Kuala Lumpur. Habitat International, 11(4), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics (pp. 375–382). ISBN: 978-960-474-380-3. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Exploratory-Factor-Analysis-%3B-Concepts-and-Theory-Taherdoost-Sahibuddin/1bd8bbd66524ccf605c879982cd35ef3a3d52160.
  43. The report entitled ‘The Great Indian Middle Class’ (2005) by National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER).Google Scholar
  44. Ukoha, O. M., & Beamish, J. O. (1997). Assessment of Residents satisfaction with public housing in Abuja, Nigeria. Habitat International, 21(4), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verhagen, A. P., Vet, H. C. D., Bie, R. A. D., Kessels, A. G., Boers, M., Bouter, L. M., et al. (1998). The Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(12), 1235–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vrbka, S. J., & Combs, E. R. (1993). Predictors of neighborhood and community satisfaction in rural communities. Housing and Society, 20(1), 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, X., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2008). Analysis of left-turn crash injury severity by conflicting pattern using partial proportional odds models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1674–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, D., & Wang, F. (2016). Contributions of the usage and affective experience of the residential environment to residential satisfaction. Housing Studies, 31(1), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, R. (2005). Gologit2: A program for generalized logistic regression/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. https://www.stata.com/meeting/4nasug/gologit2.pdf.
  50. Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, R. (2016). Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yakubu, A., Idahor, K. O., & Agade, Y. I. (2009). Using factor scores in multiple linear regression model for predicting the carcass weight of broiler chickens using body measurements. Revista UDO Agrícola, 9, 963–967.Google Scholar
  53. Ziraba, A. K., Fotso, J. C., & Ochako, R. (2009). Overweight and obesity in urban Africa: A problem of the rich or the poor? BMC Public Health, 9(465), 1–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Regional PlanningIndian Institute of Technology (IIT) KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations