Comparing the lifestyles and environmental perceptions of rural and urban children: a case study in Turkey
- 336 Downloads
This study aims to compare lifestyles and environmental perceptions of urban and rural children. Ninety-two students completed a questionnaire and were given two means (drawing or wring) to express their thoughts regarding (1) the activity and play areas, (2) their neighborhood and (3) their city. The results showed higher levels of parental supervision and restrictions on the independent mobility of the urban children in outdoor areas. This and other differences regarding the life styles are reflected in the children’s drawings of various settings. The results have applied value for planners and urban designers, and additional research is currently underway.
KeywordsChildren Environmental perception Drawings Cities and neighborhoods
- Batur, M. (2013). İzmir’in EkoTurizm Potansiyeli, TMMOB 2. İzmir Kent Sempozyumu (pp 597–621).Google Scholar
- Çakırer Ö. Y. (2015a). Imagined streets of Urban children: In Beyoğlu Sütlüce-Örnektepe Region. 1. Uluslar arası Kent Araştırmaları Kongresi (pp. 1146–1159).Google Scholar
- Çakırer, Ö. Y. (2015b). Çocukların Şehre Katılımı: Bursa Yerel Yönetimleri Üzerinde Bir Okuma. Şehir ve Toplum, 2, 103–115.Google Scholar
- Caner, Ç. (2007). Townscape and building complexes in medieval Western Anatolia under Turkish-Islamic culture. Politica, 306, 27–48.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The theory of affordances The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (pp. 127–143).Google Scholar
- Golledge, R. G. (1991). Cognition of Physical and Built Environments. In T. Garling & G. W. Evans (Eds.), Environment, Cognition, and Action (pp. 35–63). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- James, S. (1990). Is there a ‘place’ for children in geography? Area, 22(3), 278–283. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20002871
- Kaygalak, İ. (2006). İzmir’de Karşıyaka-Çiğli aksının kentsel gelişim süreci ve bu gelişimi etkileyen faktörler. Doctoral dissertation, Ege Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
- Levend, S., Meşhur, M. Ç., & Sağ, N. S. (2016). Settlement pattern corruption problem in rural areas and alternative approaches: Beyşehir-Emen, Turkey experiences. International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17(6), 41–52.Google Scholar
- Maneja-Zaragoza, R., Linde, D. V., & Juncà, M. B. (2013). Drawing analysis: Tools for understanding children’s perceptions of community conservation. In L. Porter-Bolland, I. Ruiz-Mallén, C. Camacho-Benavides & S. McCandless (Eds.), Community action for conservation. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (2014). Turkey Habitat III National Report. Retrieved from https://www.csb.gov.tr/db/habitat/editordosya/file/TURKEY_HABITAT-III_NATIONAL_REPORT_(english).pdf.
- Uygun, B. (2012). En az yeşil alan İzmir’de. NTV News. Retrieved from https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/en-az-yesil-alan-izmirde,orCpWy08JE2ZJkU5EKjb6w.
- Yüksel, Ç. C. (2014). A Western Anatolian Urban Centre from the Aydinid Principality to the Ottoman State: Spatial transformation of tire. Vakıflar Dergisi, 42, 19–33.Google Scholar