Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 151–173 | Cite as

The formation and perception of safety, danger and insecurity inside gated communities: two cases from Istanbul, Turkey

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 186 Downloads

Abstract

This paper will explore safety and danger in gated communities in Turkey, an important subject of study in recent research in urban studies, conducted nationally and internationally. Safety has become a major concern in the last years, especially in large metropolises, leading people to move to gated communities which are thought to protect residents from urban problems. The paper uses the data collected during a fieldwork conducted in two gated communities in Istanbul. The main data is based on semi-structured in-depth interviews with their residents and other participants providing first-hand information on two case studies. The paper also uses visual and statistical data provided by relevant administrative officers. The paper indicates that gated communities are not totally isolated and ready-made sites. Rather, it argues that they create a mixture of “traditional” and “ready-made” safety while they also lead to new forms of danger, all of which emerging from their different socio-spatial configurations.

Keywords

Safety Danger Insecurity Gated communities People and space Istanbul 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for the support of gatekeepers who provided valuable information about and access to the case studies and the towns of Gokturk and Omerli. The author is also grateful to the residents and administrators of Istanbul Istanbul and Kasaba without whom this research could not be conducted and finalised. Last by not least, the author also thanks three anonymous reviewers who made valuable comments on the previous version of the paper.

References

  1. Atkinson, R., & Blandy, S. (2009). Gated communities/privatopias. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography (Vol. 4, pp. 297–301). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2004). The fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time–space trajectories of segregation. Housing Studies, 19(6), 875–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayata, S. (2002). The new middle class and the joys of suburbia. In D. Kandiyoti & A. Saktanber (Eds.), Fragments of culture: The everyday of modern Turkey (pp. 25–42). London: Tauris & Co Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bagaeen, S., & Uduku, O. (2012). Gated histories: An introduction to themes and concepts. In S. Bagaeen & O. Uduku (Eds.), Gated communities: Social sustainability in contemporary and historical gated developments (pp. 1–8). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  5. Bali, R. N. (2004). Tarz-i Hayat’tan Life Style’a Yeni Seckinler, Yeni Mekanlar, Yeni Yasamlar [From ‘Way of Life’ to Lifestyle: New Elites, New Spaces, New Lives] (6th ed.). Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.Google Scholar
  6. Bartu, A. (2002). Dislayici bir kavram olarak ‘mahalle’ [‘Neighbourhood’ as an exclusionary Concept]. Istanbul, 40(1), 84–86.Google Scholar
  7. Bartu, A., & Kolluoglu, B. (2008). Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: A gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey, 39, 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baycan Levent, T., & Gulumser, A. A. (2004). Production and marketing of gated communities in Istanbul. In Paper presented at the 44th European Congress of the European regional Science Association Regions and Fiscal Federalism, Porto. Available: http://www-sre.wu-wien.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa04/PDF/525.pdf (18/05/2017).
  9. Blakely, E., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  10. Breetzke, G. D., Landman, K., & Cohn, E. G. (2014). Is it safer behind the gates? Crime and gated communities in South Africa. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caldeira, T. (2000). City of walls: Crime, segregation, and citizenship in Sao Paolo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cınar, C., Cizmeci, F., & Koksal, A. (2006). The new address of social polarization in Istanbul: Gated communities. In Paper presented at the 42nd ISoCaRP international planning congress, Istanbul. Available: http://www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/854.pdf (18/05/2017).
  13. Danis, D. (2001). Istanbul’da uydu yerlesmelerin yayginlasmasi: Bahcesehir ornegi [The spread of satellite towns in Istanbul: The case of Bahcesehir]. In F. Gumusoglu (Ed.), 21. Yuzyil Karsisinda Kent ve Insan [The City and People in the 21st Century] (pp. 151–160). Istanbul: Baglam Yayincilik.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, M. (1998). City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  15. Dinzey-Flores, Z. (2013). Locked in, locked out: Gated communities in a Puerto Rican City. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duca, F. (2015). Gating in Johannesburg: Digging inside the social and political system of a golf estate and suburban suburb. In S. Bagaeen & O. Uduku (Eds.), Beyond gated communities: Urban gating and soft boundaries (pp. 49–64). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Esen, O. (2007). Gokturk: Temel Parametreler. Istanbul, 59(5), 98–101.Google Scholar
  18. Esen, O., & Rieniets, T. (2008). Fortress Istanbul: Gated communities and the socio-urban transformation. In F. Eckardt & K. Wildner (Eds.), Public Istanbul, spaces and spheres of the urban (pp. 83–112). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag für Kommunikation, Kultur und Soziale Praxis.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Genis, S. (2007). Producing elite localities: The rise of gated communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 44(4), 771–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Genis, S. (2012). Takdim, ozel sayı: guvenlikli siteler: sosyo-mekansal ayrısmanın yeni bicimi [Editorial: Special issue: Gated communities: The new form of socio-spatial segregation]. Idealkent, 6, 5–9.Google Scholar
  22. Glasze, G., & Alkhayyal, A. (2002). Gated housing estates in the Arab world: Case studies in Lebanon and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Network infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hook, D., & Vrdoljak, M. (2002). Gated communities, heterotopia and a ‘rights’ of privilege: A ‘heterotopology’ of the South African security-park. Geoforum, 33(2), 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keyder, C. (2000). Arka plan [The Setting]. In C. Keyder (Ed.), Istanbul: Kuresel ile Yerel Arasinda [Istanbul: Between the Global and the Global] (pp. 9–40). Istanbul: Metis.Google Scholar
  26. Kurtulus, H. (2005a). Bir ‘Utopya’ Olarak Bahcesehir [Bahcesehir as an ‘Utopia’]. In H. Kurtulus (Ed.), Istanbul’da Kentsel Ayrisma [Urban Segregation in Istanbul] (pp. 77–126). Istanbul: Baglam Yayincilik.Google Scholar
  27. Kurtulus, H. (2005b). Istanbul’da Kapali Yerlesmeler: Beykoz Konaklari Ornegi [Gated Communities in Istanbul: The Case of Beykoz Konakları]. In H. Kurtulus (Ed.), Istanbul’da Kentsel Ayrisma [Urban Segregation in Istanbul] (pp. 161–187). Istanbul: Baglam Yayincilik.Google Scholar
  28. Kurtulus, H. (2011). Gated communities as representations of new upper and middle classes in Istanbul. I.U. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Dergisi, 44(3), 49–65.Google Scholar
  29. Landman, K. (2007). Exploring the impact of gated communities on social and spatial justice and its relation to restorative justice and peacebuilding in South Africa. Acta Juridica, 7, 134–155.Google Scholar
  30. Landman, K., & Schönteich, M. (2002). Urban fortresses: Gated communities as a reaction to crime. The African Security Review, 11(4), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lang, R. E., & Danielsen, K. A. (1997). Gated communities in America: Walling out the world? Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 867–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Low, S. (2001). The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear. American Anthropologist, New Series, 103(1), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Low, S. (2003). Behind the gates: Life, security and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Massey, D. (1991). A global sense of place. Marxism Today, 38, 24–29.Google Scholar
  35. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  36. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Odrowaz-Coates, A. (2015). A gated community as a ‘soft’ and gendered total institution. International Sociology, 30(3), 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oktem, B. (2005). Kuresel Kent Soyleminin Kentsel Mekani Donusturmedeki Rolu [The Role of the Discourse of the Global City in the Transformation of the Urban Space]. In H. Kurtulus (Ed.), Istanbul’da Kentsel Ayrisma [Urban Segregation in Istanbul] (pp. 25–76). Istanbul: Baglam Yayincilik.Google Scholar
  40. Oncu, A. (1988). The politics of the urban land market in Turkey: 1950–1980. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(1), 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oncu, A. (1997). The myth of the ideal home travels across cultural borders to Istanbul. In A. Oncu & P. Weyland (Eds.), Space, culture, power: Struggles over new identities in globalizing cities (pp. 56–72). London: ZED.Google Scholar
  42. Perouse, J. F., & Danis, D. (2005). Zenginligin mekanda yeni yansimalari: Istanbul’da guvenlikli siteler [The new reflections of richness in the space: Gated communities in Istanbul]. Toplum ve Bilim, 104, 92–123.Google Scholar
  43. Rivadulla, M. J. A. (2007). Golden ghettos: Gated communities and class residential segregation in Montevideo, Uruguay. Environment and Planning A, 39(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roitman, S., & Phelps, N. (2011). Do gates negate the city? Gated communities’ contribution to the urbanisation of suburbia in Pilar, Argentina. Urban Studies, 48(16), 3487–3509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheinbaum, D. (2008). Gated communities in Mexico City: A historical perspective. Urban Design International, 13, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Sonmez, M. (1996). Istanbul’un iki Yuzu 1980’den 2000’e Degisim [Two Faces of Istanbul: The Transformation from 1980 to 2000]. Ankara: Arkadas Yayinevi.Google Scholar
  48. Tanulku, B. (2012). Gated communities: From self-sufficient towns to active urban agents. Geoforum, 43(3), 518–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tanulku, B. (2016). Gated communities as spatial manifestations of moral differentiation and competition: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Cultural Geography, 33(3), 310–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Webster, C., Glazse, G., & Frantz, K. (2002). The global spread of gated communities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson-Doenges, G. (2000). An exploration of sense of community and fear of crime in gated communities. Environment and Behaviour, 32(5), 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yılmaz, A., & Gunay, S. (2006). Turkiye’de Şehir Asayis Sucları: Dagılısve Başlıca Ozellikler [Urban Public Security Crimes in Turkey: Distribution and the Main Characteristics]. Milli Egitim Dergisi, 170, 230–249.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ScholarIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations